Journal of Community Health

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 409–427

Colorectal screening patterns and perceptions of risk among African-American users of a community health center

  • Isaac M. Lipkus
  • Barbara K. Rimer
  • Pauline R. Lyna
  • Archana A. Pradhan
  • Mark Conaway
  • C. T. Woods-Powell
Articles

Abstract

This study investigated risk perceptions and screening patterns for colorectal cancer among predominately low-income African-Americans age 50 and older who used a community health center. The majority of respondents either rated their risk as below average (36%) or did not know their risk (37%) for colorectal cancer. Individuals who provided a risk estimate versus those who did not know their risk were younger and held more accurate beliefs about colorectal cancer. Attributions of perceived risk best distinguished respondents who evaluated their risk to be below average versus average and above average. Compared to respondents who could not explain their risk, those who provided psychological, personal action, and heredity causes were more likely to view their risk as below average than average or above average. In comparison to national norms, these subjects reported higher frequencies of ever having had a digital rectal exam (DRE, 90%), fecal occult blood test (FOBT, 75%) and sigmoidoscopy (SIG, 33%). Moreover, 63%, 53%, and 81% reported their most recent screening for DRE, FOBT, and SIG, respectively, in accordance with ACS and NCI recommended guidelines. However, a subsequent medical audit failed to confirm these self-reports. These results suggest that: 1) educational efforts are needed to enhance knowledge and accuracy of risk perceptions for colorectal cancer; 2) further studies on attributions of risk are needed that may prove useful for developing intervention programs, and 3) studies need to interpret self-report data for colorectal cancer with caution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Potter JD, Slattery ML, Bostick RM, & Gapstur SM. Colon cancer: A review of epidemiology.Epidemiol Rev 1993; 15: 499–545.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Greenwald P. Colon cancer overview.Cancer 1992; 70: 1206–1215.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mayberry RM, Coates RJ, Hill HA, et al. Determinants of black/white differences in colon cancer survival.JNCI 1995; 87: 1686–1693.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wingo PA, Tong T, Bolden S. Cancer statistics, 1995.CA 1995; 45: 8–30.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sox HC, Woolf SH. Evidence-based practice guidelines from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.JAMA 1993; 269:2678.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Healthy People 2000: National health promotion and disease prevention objectives. US Department of Health and Human Services. DHHS Pub No. (PHS) 95-1256-1.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Breen N, & Kessler L. Current trends in cancer screening: 1987 and 1992.MMWR 1996; 26:57–61.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jepson C, Kessler GL, Portnoy B, Gibbs, T. Black-White differences in cancer prevention knowledge and behavior.Am J Public Health 1991; 81: 501–504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Myers RE, Trock BJ, Lerman C, Wolf T, Ross E, & Engstrom PF. Adherence to colorectal screening in an HMO population.Prev Med 1990; 19: 502–514.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sandler RS, Devillis BM, Blalock SJ, Holland KL. Participation of high-risk subjects in colon cancer screening.Cancer 1989; 63: 2211–2215.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huffman A, Abcarian H. Six years of occult blood screening in an urban public hospital: Concepts, methods, and reflections on approaches to reducing avoidable mortality among black Americans.J Natl Medl Assoc 1991; 83: 994–999.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Janz NK, Becker MH. The Health Belief Model: A decade later.Health Educ Q 1984; 11: 1–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rogers RW. Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appraisals: A revised theory of protection motivation. In JT Cacioppo and RE Petty (Eds).Social Psychophysiology. A sourcebook. New York: Guilford, 1983, pp 153–176.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weinstein ND. The precaution adoption process.Health Psychol 1988; 7: 355–386.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Blalock SJ, Devellis BM, & Sandier RS. Participation in fecal occult blood screening: A critical review.Prev Med 1987; 18: 9–18.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blalock SJ, Devillis BM, Afifi RA, & Sandier RS. Risk perceptions and participation in colorectal cancer screening.Health Psychol 1990; 9: 792–806.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    MaCrae FA, Hill DJ, St. John DJ, Ambikapathy A, Gardner, JF, & the Ballarat General Practioner Research Group. Predicting colon cancer screening behavior from health beliefs.Prev Med 1984; 13: 115–126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Myers RE, Ross EA, Jepson C, et al. Modeling adherence to colorectal cancer screening.Prev Med 1994; 23: 142–151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bloom J, Hayes W, Saunder F, Flatt S. Cancer awareness and secondary prevention practices in Black Americans: Implications for interventions.Fam Community Health 1987; 10: 19–30.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Evaxx Inc. Black Americans' attitudes toward cancer and cancer tests.CA 1981; 31: 212–218.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weinstein ND. Why it won't happen to me: Perceptions of risk factors and susceptability.Health Psychol 1984; 3: 431–457.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Price JH. Perceptions of colorectal cancer in a socioeconomically disadvantaged population.J Community Health 1993; 18: 347–362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weinstein ND. Unrealistic optimism about future life events.J Pers Soc Psychol 1980; 39: 806–820.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Price JH, Desmond SM, Wallace M, Smith D, Stewart PW. Black Americans' perceptions of cancer: A study utilizing the Health Belief Model.J Nail Med Assoc 1988; 12: 1297–1304.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Strecher VJ, Kreuter, MW, Kobrin SC. Do cigarette smokers have unrealistic perceptions of their heart attack, cancer, and stroke risks?J Beh Med 1995; 18:45–54.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Holt WS. Factors affecting compliance with screening sigmoidoscopy.J Fam Pract 1991; 32: 585–589.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dent OW, Bartrop R, Goulston KJ, & Chapuis PH. Participation in faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer.Soc Sci Med 1983; 17:17–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vernon SW, Acquavella JF, Yarborough CM, Hughes JI, & Thar, WE. Reasons for participation in a colorectal cancer screening program for a cohort of high risk poplypropylene workers.J Occup Med 1990; 32: 46–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rimer BK, Conaway MR, Lyna PR, et al. Cancer screening practices among women in a community health center population.Am JPrev Med (in press).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cochran W.Sampling Techniques. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1977.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Aiken LS, Fenaughty AM, West SG, Johnson JJ, Luckett TL. Perceived determinants of risk for breast cancer and the relations among objective risk, perceived risk, and screening behavior over time. Women's Health: Research on Gender, Behavior, and Policy 1995; 1: 27–50.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kreuter MW, Strecher VJ. Changing inaccurate perceptions of health risk: Results from a randomized trial.Health Psychol 1995; 14:56–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cooper GS, Yuan Z, Landefeld S, Johanson JF, Rimm AA. A national population-based study of incidence of colorectal cancer and age.Cancer 1995; 75: 775–781.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Breslow RA, Sorkin JD, Frey CM, Kessler LG. What Americans know and don't know about cancer risk and survival. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Weinstein ND. Unrealistic optimism about susceptability to health problems.J Beh Med 1982; 5: 441–460.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    King ES, Rimer BK, Trock B, Balshem A, Engstrom P. How valid are mammography self-reports?Am J Public Health 1990; 80:1386–1388.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    McKenna MT, Mallin K, Speers M, & Wernecke R. Agreement between patient self-reports and medical records for pap smear histories.Am J Prev Med 1992; 8:287–291.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Warnecke RB, Graham S. Characteristics of Blacks obtaining Papanicolaou smears.Cancer 1976; 37:2015–2025.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Whitman S, Lacey L, Ansell D, Chen EH, Dell J, Phillips CW. Do chart reviews and interviews provide the same information about breast and cervical cancer screening?Int J Epidemiol 1993; 22:393–397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Myers RE, Ross EA, Wolf TA, Blashem A, Jepson C, Millner L. Behavioral interventions to increase adherence in colorectal cancer screening.Med Care 1991; 29: 1039–1050.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Myers RE, Blashem AM, Wolf TA, Ross EA, Millner L. Adherence to continuous screenings for colorectal neoplasia.Med Care 1993; 31: 508–519.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Fox SA, Stein JA. The effects of physician-patient communication on mammography utilization by different ethnic groups.Med Care 1991; 29: 1065–1082.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rimer BK: Mammography use in the U.S.: Trends and the impact of intervention.Ann Beh Med 1995; 16:317–326.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zapka JG, Hosmer D, Constanza ME, Harris DR, Stoddard A. Changes in mammography use: Economic, need, and service factors.Am J Public Health 1992; 82:1345–1351.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isaac M. Lipkus
    • 1
  • Barbara K. Rimer
    • 1
  • Pauline R. Lyna
    • 1
  • Archana A. Pradhan
    • 1
  • Mark Conaway
    • 1
  • C. T. Woods-Powell
    • 1
  1. 1.Duke University Medical CenterDurham

Personalised recommendations