Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 22, Issue 10, pp 1015–1019 | Cite as

Decisions to forego life-sustaining treatment and the duty of documentation

  • G. Melltorp
  • T. Nilstun
Original

Abstract

Objective

To study the current practice of documenting decisions to forego life-sustaining treatment in an intensive care unit (ICU), using the Swedish Medical Records Act as a frame of reference.

Setting

The ICU at Malmoe General Hospital, Sweden.

Materials

The medical records of the first 600 cases treated in the ICU in 1992.

Methods

Analysis of documents and informal observational procedures.

Results

Decisions to forego lifesustaining treatment were documented in the medical records of 34 patients, 17 of whom died in the ICU. In many cases, the treatment is specified, but often it is only rather vaguely described. The main reason for foregoing treatment is poor prognosis. There is no indication that the decisions had been discussed with the patients. In 18 of the 34 medical records, there are notes indicating that relatives were informed about the decision. Notes in most of the 34 medical records imply that joint deliberation took place between the anaesthesiologists in the ICU and the other physician(s) responsible for the treatment of the patient.

Conclusion

The medical records give a fairly accurate picture of the frequency with which such decisions are made at this particular ICU, although the number might be somewhat underestimated. However, the content of the documentation is rather scanty and does not fully satisfy the requirements of the Swedish Medical Records Act. Further studies are needed to warrant any generalization.

Key words

Ethics Documentation Foregoing life-sustaining treatment Intensive care unit Law Medical record 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lipton HL (1986) Do-not-resuscitate decisions in a community hospital. Incidence, implications, and outcome. JAMA 256: 1164–1169Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Uhlmann RF, McDonald WJ, Inui TS (1984) Epidemiology of no-code orders in an academic hospital. West J Med 40: 114–116Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Keffer MJ, Keffer HL (1992) Do-not-resuscitate in the operating room: moral obligation of anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg 74:901–905Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Swisher KN, Ayres SM (1992) Who decides when care is futile? Intensive Crit Care Digest 11: 59–64Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luce JM (1992) Conflicts over ethical principles in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 20: 313–315Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Silverman HJ, Vickiny JK, Gasner MR (1992) Advance directives: implications for critical care. Crit Care Med 20: 1027–1031Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    The Appleton international conference (1992) Developing guidelines for decisions to forgo life-prolonging medical treatment, J Med Ethics (Suppl) 18Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Teres D (1993) Trends from the United States with end-of-life decisions in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 19:316–322Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Willow K (1993) Författningshandbok 1993 Almquist & Wiksell. UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Socialstyrelsens allmänna råd 1992: 2 (1992) Livsuppehållande åtgärder i livets slutskede Stockholm (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Två nya dokument ger riktlinjer om att avstå från behandling. Behanding får avbrytas, omvårdnad måste ges. Patientens vilja vägleder, men läkaren beslutar. (1991) Lakartidningen 88: 2163–2164 (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Asplund K, Britton M (1990) Do-not-resuscitate orders in Swedish medical wards. J Intern Med 228: 139–145Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vincent JL (1990) European attitudes toward ethical problems in intensive care medicine: results of an ethical questionnaire. Intensive Care Med 16: 256–264Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hastings Center (1987) Guidelines on the termination of life-sustaining treatment and the care of the dying. University Press, IndianaGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Luce JM (1990) Ethical principles in critical care. JAMA 263: 696–700Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smedira NG, Evans BH, Graus LS et al (1990) Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. N Engl J Med 322: 309–315Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Faber-Langendoen K, Bartels D (1992) Process of forgoing life-sustaining treatment in a university hospital. An empirical study. Crit Care Med 20: 570–577Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Berggren L, Olsson J, Sjökvist P (1991) Intensivvård i livets slutskede—etiska ställningstaganden (in Swedish). Lakartidningen 88: 2368–2369Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beauchamp TL (1978) A reply to Rachel on active and passive euthanasia. In: Beauchamp and Perlin (eds) Ethical issues in death and dying. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp 244–258Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Donabedian A (1988) The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA 260: 1743–1748Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Melltorp
    • 1
  • T. Nilstun
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AnaesthesiologyCentral HospitalVäxjöSweden
  2. 2.Department of Medical EthicsLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations