Histochemistry and Cell Biology

, Volume 105, Issue 2, pp 153–161 | Cite as

Three-dimensional analysis of the arrangement of compact chromatin in the nucleus of G0 rat lymphocytes

  • Gabriel López-Velázquez
  • Jorge Márquez
  • Ernestina Ubaldo
  • Gabriel Corkidi
  • Olga Echeverría
  • Gerardo H. Vázquez Nin
Original Paper


The arrangement of compact chromatin of G0 lymphocytes was studied in three-dimensional reconstructions of the ensemble of the chromatin and of individual compact chromatin bodies. Rat spleen was serially cut and sections were contrasted with procedures preferential for DNA. Electron microscopy images were digitized, processed, and displayed using a commercial soft-ware package, complemented by a system for three-dimensional reconstruction and analysis developed by us on an IBM-compatible microcomputer provided with an image acquisition board. The reconstructions showed a continuous layer of compact chromatin in contact with the nuclear envelope that prevents the automatic recognition of individual chromatin clumps. The ensemble of the arrangement of compact chromatin was found to be very similar in different lymphocytes. After morphological filtering procedures, the initial mass was divided into individual bodies of compact chromatin, which were tagged. Most of these bodies contact the nuclear envelope. The number of bodies as well as the number of contacts with the envelope are similar and correspond to a haploid number of chromosomes. The largest body is always the one containing nucleolus-associated chromatin. When the cell has two nucleoli, the nucleolus-associated chromatin bodies contact the envelope in diametrically opposed areas. This feature was also described in rat liver cells. It is concluded that: (a) the individualized compact chromatin bodies do not correspond to an entire chromosome or to a pair of chromosomes; (b) the arrangement of compact chromatin is not identical in each G0 lymphocyte, but there are patterns that are repeated with limited changes; and (c) there are common features that appear in different cell types of individuals of the same species.


Nuclear Envelope Automatic Recognition Entire Chromosome Compact Chromatin Acquisition Board 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Appels R, Driscoll C, Peacock WJ (1978) Heterochromatin and highly repeated DNA sequences in rye (Secale cereale). Chromosoma 70:67–89Google Scholar
  2. Artzy E, Frieder G, Herman G (1981) The theory, design, implementation, and evaluation of a three-dimensional surface detection algorithm. Comput Vision Graphics Image Processing 15:1–24Google Scholar
  3. Avivi L, Feldman M (1980) Arrangement of chromosomes in the interphase nucleus of plants. Hum Genet 55:281–295PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker H, Lindsey J, Weisbroth S (1979) The laboratory rat. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett MD (1982) Nucleotypic basis of the spatial ordering of chromosomes in eukaryotes and implications of the order for genome evolution and phenotypic variation. In: Dover GA, Flavell RB (eds) Genome evolution, Academic Press London, pp 239–261Google Scholar
  6. Bennett MD (1984) Nuclear architecture and its manipulation. In: Gustafson JP (ed) Gene manipulation in plant improvement. Plenum, New York, pp 469–501Google Scholar
  7. Beucher S, Lantuejoul C (1979) Use of watersheds in contour detection. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Image Processing: real-time edge and motion detection/estimation. Sponsored by: Centre Commun des Études en Télévision et Télécommunications. Institut National des Sciences Appliquées et Institut de Recherche en Informatique, et Systèmes Aleatoires. Rennes, France, 1–12 FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  8. Bochkov NP, Lopukhin YM, Kuleshov NP, Kovalchuk LV (1974) Cytogenetic study of patients with ataxia-teleangiectasia. Humangenetik 24:115–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourgeois CA, Laquerriere F, Hemon D, Hubert J, Bouteille M (1985) New data on in situ position of the inactive X chromosonme in the interphase nucleus of human fibroblasts. Hum Genet 69:122–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Brenner S, Pepper D, Berns MW, Tan E, Brinkley BR (1981) Kinetochore structure, duplication, and distribution in mammalian cells: analysis by human autoantibodies from scleroderma patients. J Cell Biol 91:95–102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cogliati R, Gautier A (1973) Mise en évidence de l'ADN et des polysaccharides à l'aide d'un nouveau réactif “de type Schiff”. CR Acad Sci D 276:3041–3044Google Scholar
  12. Cohen MM, Shaw MW (1964) Effects of mitomycin C on human chromosomes. J Cell Biol 23:386–395PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Comings DE (1968) The rationale for an order arrangement of chromatin in interphase nucleus. Am J Genet 20:440–460Google Scholar
  14. Comings DE (1980) Arrangement of chromatin in the nucleus. Hum Genet 53:331–343Google Scholar
  15. Cremer T, Cremer C, Baumann H, Luedtke EK, Sperling K, Teuber V, Zorn C (1982) Rabl's model of the interphase chromosome arrangement tested in Chinese hamster cells by premature chromosome condensation and laser-UV microbeam experiments. Hum Genet 60:46–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cremer T, Tesin D, Hopman AH, Manuelidis L (1988) Rapid interphase and metaphase assessment of specific chromosomal changes in neuroectodermal tumor cells by in situ hybridization with chemically modified DNA probes. Exp Cell Res 176:199–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. DeBoni U, Mintz AH (1986) Curvilinear, three-dimensional motion of chromatin domains and nucleoli in neuronal interphase nuclei. Science 234:863–866PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Esquivel C, Rovira P, Echeverría O, Vázquez Nin GH (1987) A simple staining method for chromatin in electron microscopy compatible with serial sectioning. Ultramicroscopy 21:103–110PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Esquivel C, Vázquez Nin GH, Echeverría O (1989) Evidence of repetitive patterns of chromatin distribution in cell nuclei of rat liver. Acta Anat 136:94–98PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Evans JK, Filion WG (1982) The distribution of chromatin in the interphase nucleus ofZebrina pendula. Can J Genet Cytol 24: 583–591Google Scholar
  21. Ferguson M, Ward DC (1992) Cell cycle dependent movement in pre-mitotic human T-lymphocyte nuclei. Chromosoma 101: 557–565PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fussell CP (1975) The position of interphase chromosomes and late replicating DNA in centromere and telomere regions ofAllium cepa L. Chromosoma 50:201–210Google Scholar
  23. Fussell CP (1977) Telomere associations in interphase nuclei ofAllium cepa demonstrated by C-banding. Exp Cell Res 110: 111–117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ghosh S, Roy SCh (1977) Orientation of interphase chromosomes as detected by Giemsa C-bands. Chromosoma 61:49–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Goldman IL, Zolotarev VM, Vasileva SF (1977) The space location of chromosomes in the somatic cell nuclei. IV. Homologous chromosomes in guinea pig and domestic pig cells. Tsitologiia 19:855–863PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gordon D, Udupa J (1989) Fast surface tracking in three-dimensional binary images. Comput Vision Graphics Image Processing 45:196–214Google Scholar
  27. Hadlaczky GY, Went M, Ringertz NR (1986) Direct evidence for non-random localization of mammalian chromosomes in the interphase nucleus. Exp Cell Res 167:1–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hager HD, Schoeder-Kurth TM, Vogel F (1982) Position of chromosomes in the human interphase nucleus. An analysis of nonhomologous chromatid translocations in lymphocyte cultures after Treminon treatment and from patients with Franconi's anemia and Bloom's syndrome. Hum Genet 61:342–356PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hilliker AJ, Appels R (1989) The arrangement of interphase chromosomes: structural and functional aspects. Exp Cell Res 185: 297–318Google Scholar
  30. Holowacz T, DeBoni U (1991) Arrangement of kinetochore proteins and satellite DNA in neuronal interphase nuclei changes induced by gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Exp Cell Res 197:36–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hubert J, Bourgeois CA (1986) The nuclear skeleton and the spatial arrangement of chromosomes in the interphase nucleus of vertebrate somatic cells. Hum Genet 74:1–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuroiwa T, Tanaka N (1971a) Fine structure of interphase nucleus. I. The morphological classification of nucleus in interphase ofCrepis capillaris. Cytologia 36:143–160Google Scholar
  33. Kuroiwa T, Tanaka N (1971b) Fine structure of interphase nucleus. IV. The behavior of late replicating chromatin during a late portion of S period as revealed by electron microscope radio-autography. J Cell Biol 49:939–942PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lafontaine JG, Lord A (1974) An ultrastructural and radioautographic study of the evolution of the interphase nucleus in plant meristemic cells (Allium porrum). J Cell Sci 14:263–287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Leger I, Guillaud M, Krief B, Brugal G (1994) Interactive computer-assisted analysis of chromosome I colocalization with nucleoli. Cytometry 16:313–323PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Leitch AR, Mosgöller W, Scwarzacher T, Bennett MD (1990) Genomic in situ hybridization to sectioned nuclei shows chromosome domains in grass hybrids. J Cell Sci 95:335–341PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lyon MF (1972) X-chromosome inactivation and developmental patterns in mammals. Biol Rev 47:1–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Manuelidis L (1984) Different CNS cell types display distinct and nonrandom arrangements of satellite DNA sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:3123–3127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Manuelidis L (1985a) Indications of centromere movement during interphase and differentiation. Ann NY Acad Sci 450:205–221PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Manuelidis L (1985b) Individual interphase chromosome domains revealed by in situ hybridization. Hum Genet 71:288–293PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Manuelidis L, Langer-Safer, PR, Ward DC (1982) High-resolution mapping of satellite DNA using biotin-labeled DNA probes. J Cell Biol 95:619–625PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Mares V, Giordano PA, Pelliciari C, Scherini E, Lisá V, Bottone MG, Bottiroli G (1991) Changes in cell cycle and chromatin distribution in C6 glioma cells treated by dibutyryl cyclic AMP. Cell Prolif 24:569–577PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Metz CW (1916) Chromosome studies on the Diptera. II. The paired association of chromosomes in the Diptera and its significance. J Exp Zool 21:213–279Google Scholar
  44. Moroi Y, Hartman AL, Nakane PK, Tan EM (1981) Distribution of kinetochore (centromere) antigen in mammalian cell nuclei. J Cell Biol 90:254–259PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Murray AB, Davies HG (1979) Three-dimensional reconstruction of the chromatin bodies in the nuclei of mature erythrocytes from the newtTriturus cristatus: the number of nuclear envelope-attachment sites. J Cell Sci 35:59–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Park PC, DeBoni U (1992) Spatial rearrangement and enhanced clustering of kinetochores in interphase nuclei of dorsal root ganglion neurons in vitro: association with nucleolar fusion. Exp Cell Res 203:222–229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Pomerat CM, Hendelman WJ, Raiborn CW, Massey JF (1967) Dynamic activities of nervous tissue in vitro. In: Hyden H (ed) The neuron Elsevier New York, pp 119–173Google Scholar
  48. Rabl C (1885) Über Zellteilung. Morphol Jahrb 10:214–330Google Scholar
  49. Schardin M, Cremer T, Hager HD, Lang M (1985) Specific staining of human chromosomes in Chinese hamster x man hybrid cell lines demonstrates interphase chromosome territories. Hum Genet 71:281–287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Stack S, Roy SCh (1977) Orientation of interphase chromosomes as detected by Giemsa C-bands. Chromosoma 61:49–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Udupa J (1981) Determination of 3-D shape parameters from boundary information. Comput Vision Graphics Image Processing 17:52–59Google Scholar
  52. Udupa J (1990) Boundary and object labelling in three-dimensional images. Comput Vision Graphics Image Processing 5:355–369Google Scholar
  53. Vázquez Nin GH, Chávez B, Tomás-Martin C (1973) A preferential staining method for chromatin in electron microscopy. J Microsc 16:243–246Google Scholar
  54. Vázquez Nin GH, Echeverría OM, Molina E, Fragoso J (1978) Effects of ovariectomy and estradiol injection on nuclear structures of endometrial epithelial cells. Acta Anat 102:308–318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Vogel F, Schoeder TM (1974) Internal order of the interphase nucleus. Humangenetik 25:265–297PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Testillano PS, Sánchezpina MA, Olmedilla A, Tandler CJ, Risueño MC (1991) A specific ultrastructural method to reveal DNA. The NAMA-Ur. J Histochem Cytochem 39:1427–1438PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Wachtler F, Hopman AHN, Wiegant J, Schwarzacher HG (1986) On the position of nucleolus organizer regions (NORs) in interphase nuclei. Studies with a new, non-autoradiographic in situ hybridization method. Exp Cell Res 167:227–240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Weimer R, Haaf T, Krüger J, Poot M, Schmid M (1992) Characterization of centromere arrangements and test for random distribution in G0, G1, S, G2, G1, and early S′ phase in human lymphocytes. Hum Genet 88:673–682PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Westergaard M (1964) Studies on the mechanism of crossing over. I. Theoretical considerations. C R Trav Lab Calrsberg 34:359–405Google Scholar
  60. Wettstein R, Graver A (1973) Film-supporting frames for mounting section grids. J Ultrastruct Res 43:436–447Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriel López-Velázquez
    • 1
  • Jorge Márquez
    • 2
  • Ernestina Ubaldo
    • 1
  • Gabriel Corkidi
    • 2
  • Olga Echeverría
    • 1
  • Gerardo H. Vázquez Nin
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Electron Microscopy, Department of Biology, Faculty of SciencesUNAMMéxicoMexico
  2. 2.Laboratory of Image Processing, Center of InstrumentsUNAMMexico

Personalised recommendations