Comparative evaluation of two commercial assays for direct detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory specimens

  • F. Gamboa
  • J. M. Manterola
  • J. Lonca
  • L. Matas
  • P. J. Cardona
  • E. Padilla
  • B. Viñado
  • J. Domínguez
  • A. Hernández
  • V. Ausina
Article
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

Two commercial systems for the amplification and detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis directly from respiratory samples were compared. The Roche Cobas Amplicor MTB Test and the Roche manual Amplicor MTB Test (Roche Diagnostic Systems, USA) were applied to 755 decontaminated respiratory specimens collected from 470 patients. Results were compared with those of acid-fast staining and culture. A total of 251 specimens were collected from 156 patients diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis, including 28 specimens corresponding to 13 patients that were receiving antituberculous treatment. Given the overall positivity rate of 33.2% (251/755), the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 92.4, 100, 100, and 96.5%, respectively, for the Cobas Amplicor MTB Test and 90.8, 100, 100, and 95.8%, respectively, for the Amplicor MTB Test. For 204 (81.3%) smear positive specimens and 47 (19.7%) smear negative specimens, the sensitivity values were 100 and 59.6%, respectively, for the Cobas Amplicor MTB Test and 100 and 51%, respectively, for the Amplicor MTB Test. There were no statistically significant differences in sensitivity or specificity between the two assays and culture (p>0.05). The overall results of both assays were concordant for 99.5% of the samples. It is concluded that although both nucleic acid amplification methods are rapid and specific for the detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens, the Cobas Amplicor MTB Test appears to be slightly more sensitive than the Amplicor MTB Test when smear negative specimens are investigated.

Key words

Mycobacterium tuberculosis Detection Respiratory specimens 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hopewell PC: Impact of immunodeficiency virus infection on the epidemiology, clinical features, management and control of tuberculosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases (1992) 15:540–547.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bloom BR, Murray CJL: Tuberculosis: commentary on a re-emergent killer. Science (1992) 257:1055–1064.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abe C, Hosojima S, Fucosava Y, Kazumi Y, Takahashi M, Hirao K, Mori T: Comparison of MB-Check, BACTEC and egg-based media for recovery of mycobacteria. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1992) 30:878–881.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daniel TM: The rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis: a selective review. Journal of Laboratory Clinical Medicine (1990) 116:277–282.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heifets LB, Good RC: Current laboratory methods for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. In: Bloom BR (ed): Tuberculosis: pathogenesis, protection and control. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC (1994) pp 85–110.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Piersimoni C, Callegaro A, Nista D, Bornigia S, De Conti F, Santini G, De Sio G: Comparative evaluation of two commercial amplification assays for direct detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1997) 35:193–196.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pfyffer GE: Amplification techniques: hope or illusion in the direct detection of tuberculosis. Medical Microbiology Letters (1994) 3:335–347.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abe C, Hirano K, Wada M, Kazumi Y, Takahashi M, Fukasawa Y, Yoshimura T, Miyagi C, Goto S: Detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens by polymerase chain reaction and Gen-Probe Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1993) 31:3270–3274.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brisson-Noël A, Gicquel B, Lecossier D, Lévy-Frébault VV, Nassif X, Hance AJ: Rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis by amplification of mycobacterial DNA in clinical samples. Lancet (1989) ii:1069–1071.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clarridge III JE, Shawar RM, Shinninck TM, Plicaytis BB: Large scale use of polymerase chain reaction for detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in a routine mycobacteriology laboratory. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1993) 31:2049–2056.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Del Portillo P, Murillo LA, Patarroyo ME: Amplification of a species-specific DNA fragment ofMycobacterium tuberculosis and its possible use in diagnosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1991) 29:2163–2168.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Wit D, Steyn L, Shoemaker S, Soguin M: Direct detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens by DNA amplification. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1990) 28:2437–2441.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Wit D, Wooton M, Allan B, Steyn L: Simple method for a production of internal control DNA forMycobacterium tuberculosis polymerase chain reaction assays. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1993) 31:2204–2207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Carrino JJ, Lee HH: Nucleic acid amplification methods. Journal of Microbiological Methods (1995) 23:3–20Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Folgueira L, Delgado R, Palenque E, Noriega AR: Detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in clinical samples by using a simple lysis method and polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1993) 31:1019–1021.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kox LFF, Rhienthong D, Medo Miranda A, Udomsantisuk N, Ellis K, Van Leeuwen J, Van Heusden S, Kuijper S, Kolk AHJ: A more reliable PCR for detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1994) 32:672–678.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Noordhoek GT, Kolk AHJ, Bjune G, Catty D, Dale JW, Fine PEM, Godfrey-Faussett P, Sang-nae C, Shinnick T, Svenson SB, Wilson S, Van Embden JDA: Sensitivity and specificity of PCR for detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis: a blind comparison study among seven laboratories. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1994) 32:277–284.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Noordhoek GT, Van Embden JDA, Kolk AHJ: Reliability of nucleic acid amplification for detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis: an international collaborative quality control study among 30 laboratories. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1996) 34:2522–2525.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pfyffer GE, Kissling P, Jahn EMI, Welscher H-M, Salfinger M, Weber R: Diagnostic performance of amplifiedMycobacterium tuberculosis direct test with cerebrospinal fluid, other nonrespiratory, and respiratory specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1996) 34:834–841.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vuorinen P, Miettinen A, Vuento R, Hällströ O: Direct detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens by Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test and Roche AmplicorMycobacterium tuberculosis Test. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1995) 33:1856–1859.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Winn-Deen ES, Batt CA, Weidman M: Non-respiratory detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis LCR products in a microtiter plate format. Molecular and Cellular Probes (1993) 7:179–186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Down J, O'Connell MA, Dey MS, Walters AH, Howard DR, Little MC, Keating WE, Zwadyk P Jr, Haaland PD, McLaurin III DA, Cole G: Detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory specimens by strand displacement amplification of DNA. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1996) 34:860–865.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Van Der Vliet GME, Schukkinkm RAF, Van Gemen B, Schepers P, Klatser PR: Nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) for the identification of mycobacteria. Journal of General Microbiology (1993) 139:2423–2429.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Salfinger M, Kafader F: Comparison of two pretreatment methods for the detection of mycobacteria of BACTEC and Löwenstein-Jensen slants. Journal of Microbiological Methods (1987) 6:315–321.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Coletsos PJ: Milieu et modalités de culture adaptés à la réanimación et à la multiplication in vitro deMycobacterium tuberculosis de vitalité réduite de viabilité éphémère ou en état de quiescence. Annales de l'Institute Pasteur (1960) 99:475–495.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Luquin M, Ausina V, López-Calahorra F, Belda F, García-Barceló M, Celma C, Prats G: Evaluation of practical Chromatographic procedures for identification of clinical isolates of mycobacteria. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1991) 29:120–130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Goto M, Oka S, Okuzumi K, Kimura S, Shimada K: Evaluation of acridinium-ester-labeled DNA probes for identification ofMycobacterium tuberculosis andMycobacterium avium-Mycobacterium intracellulare complex in culture. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1991) 29:2473–2476.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jungkind D, Direnzo S, Beavis KG, Silverman NS: Evaluation of automated Cobas Amplicor PCR system for detection of several infectious agents and its impact on laboratory management. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1996) 34:2778–2783.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chain K: Clinical microscopy. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolken RH (eds): Manual of clinical microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC (1995) pp 33–51.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Snider DE Jr, Hopewell PC, Mills J, Reichman LB: Mycobacteriosis and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. American Review of Respiratory Disease (1987) 136:492–496.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Gamboa
    • 3
    • 2
  • J. M. Manterola
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. Lonca
    • 2
    • 2
  • L. Matas
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. J. Cardona
    • 1
    • 2
  • E. Padilla
    • 1
    • 2
  • B. Viñado
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. Domínguez
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. Hernández
    • 1
    • 2
  • V. Ausina
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Departamento de Genética y Microbiología, Facultad de MedicinaUniversidad Autónoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Servicio de MicrobiologíaHospital Universitario Germans Trias i PujolBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Departamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias, Unidad de Microbiología EspecialPontificia Universidad JaverianaBogotaColombia

Personalised recommendations