Advertisement

Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 273–278 | Cite as

Epidemiological impact of prolonged systematic use of topical SDD on bacterial colonization of the tracheobronchial tree and antibiotic resistance

A three year study
  • G. Nardi
  • U. Valentinis
  • A. Proietti
  • A. De Monte
  • A. Di Silvestre
  • R. Muzzi
  • R. Peressutti
  • M. G. Troncon
  • F. Giordano
Originals

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the effect of the prolonged systematic use of topical SDD (tobramycin 80 mg, polymyxin E 100 mg, amphotericin B 500 mg) on ICU ecology as expressed by changes in tracheal colonization and bacterial resistances.

Design

Prospective microbiological survey.

Setting

Polyvalent ICU of a 2000 beds general hospital.

Patients

Data concerning bacterial strains isolated from the tracheo-bronchial aspirates of all the patients admitted to a polyvalent ICU over 3 consecutive periods of 12 months ('88, '89, '90) were prospectively entered in a database and subsequently analyzed. During a 3-year period 502 patients required artificial ventilation for more than 72 h and 332 of them ('89 and '90) were treated with SDD. All samples collected within 72 h from ICU admission were excluded as well as duplicate samples from the same patients.

Intervention

All the patients admitted to the ICU in '89 and '90 and submitted to artificial ventilation for at least 24 h were routinely treated with topical SDD without i.v. antibiotic prophylaxis; in '88 SDD was not empoloyed.

Measurements and results

Criteria for collecting sputum samples and microbiological procedures remained unchanged troughout the study-time. Positive sputum were significantly less in '89 (80.8% versus 92.3%p<0.001) and this was due to a very sharp decrease in the isolation of Gram-negative strains from 43–28% (−64%p<0.0001) involving both:Enterobacteriaceae (−45%) andPseudomonaceae (−77%). In 1990; however, a new increase in Gram negative was observed, although the overall amount of Gram-negative was still 49% lower in '90 if compared to '88 (p<0.0001). A dramatic increase inPseudomonas isolation was the only factor responsible for the “rebound” observed. An increasing percentage ofPseudomonas developed a resistance towards tobramycin and only 45% ofPseudomonas strains turned out to be sensible to tobramycin in '90 against 79% in '88. A similar trend was registered for all aminoglycosides with the exception of amikacin. Gram-positive colonizations tended to increase (+63%) (p<0.0001) and this was mainly due to Coagulase negativeStaphylococci (+290%p<0.0001) andS. pneumoniae, whereasS. aureus isolations decreased (−18%) but not significantly.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that the prolonged use of SDD is associated with dramatic changes in ICU ecology: the incidence of Gram negative colonization is significantly diminished by SDD whereas Gram positive tend to increase.Pseudomonas developed an increasing resistance towards tobramycin one of the components of the SDD formula we used.

Key words

Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) Intensive care unit (ICU) Bacterial colonization Tracheobronchial aspirates Antibiotic resistance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Stoutenbeek CP, van Saane HKF, Miranda DR, Zandstra DF (1984) The effect of selective decontamination of the digestive tract on colonization and infection rate in multiple trauma patients. Intensive Care Med 10:185–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alcock SR (1988) Prospective study of colonization in ICU patients treated with SDD and systemic cefotaxime: Glasgow results. In: Vincent JL (ed) Infection control by Selective Decontamination. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 117Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kerver AJH, Rommes JH, Mevissen-Verhage EAE, Hulstaert PF, Vos A, Verhoef J, Wittebol P (1988) Prevention of colonization and infection in critically ill patients: a prospective randomized study. Crit Care Med 16:1087–1093CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Konrad F, Swalbe B, Heeg K, Wagner H, Wiedeck H, Kilian J (1989) Frequency of colonization and pneumonia and development of resistance in long-term ventilated intensive care patients subjected to selective decontamination of the digestive tract. Anaesthesist 38:99–109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ledingham LM, Alcock SR, Eastway AT, McDonal JC, McKay IC, Ramsay G (1988) Triple regimen of selective digestive decontamination of the digestive tract, systemic cefotaxime and microbiological surveillance for prevention of acquired infection. Intensive care. Lancet 8589:785–790Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mc Clelland P, Murray AE, Williams PS, van Saene HK, Gilbertson AA, Mostafa SM, Bone JM (1990) Reducing sepsis in severe combined acute renal and respiratory failure by selective decontamination of the digestive tract. Crit Care Med 18:935–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thulig B, Hartenauer U, Diemer W, Lawin P, Ritzerfeld W (1988) Infection control by selective flora suppression in critically ill patients. In: Vincent JL (ed) Infection control by selective decontamination. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 120Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alcock SR (1990) Short term parenteral antibiotic used as a supplement to SDD regimens. Infection 18 [Suppl 1]:S14–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vandenbroucke CM, Vandenbroucke JP (1991) Effect of selective decontamination of the digestive tract on respiratory tract infections and mortality in the intensive unit. Lancet 338:859–862CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vollard EJ, Clasener HA, Janssen AJ, Wynne HJ (1990) Influence of cefotaxime on microbial colonization resistance in healthy volunteers. J Antimicrob Chemother 26:117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Flaherty J, Nathan C, Kabins SA, Weinstein RA (1990) Pilot trial of selective digestive decontamination for prevention of bacterial infection in an intensive care unit. J Infect Dis 162:1393–1397CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nardi G, Valentinis U, Bartaletti R, Bello A, De Monte A, Muzzi R, Giordano F, Troncon MG (1990) Effectiveness of topical selective decontamination without any systemic antibiotic prophylaxis, in the prevention of pulmonary infections in ICU patients. Minerva Anesthesiol 56:19–26Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pugin J, Auckenthale R, Lew DP, Suter PM (1991) Oropharyngeal decontamination decreases incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. JAMA 265:2704–2710CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nardi G, Bartaletti R, De Monte A, Giordano F, Muzzi R (1990) It is necessary to associate a systemic antibiotic prophylaxis to selective digestive decontamination? (Abstract) Intensive Care Med 16 [Suppl 1]:S33Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gastinne H, Wolff M, Delatour F, Faurisson F, Chevret S (1992) A controlled trial in intensive care units of selective decontamination of the digestive tract with nonabsorbable antibiotics. N Engl J Med 326:594–599CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johanson WG, Pierce AK, Sanford JP, Thomas GD (1972) Nosocomial respiratory infections with Gram negative bacilli: the significance of colonization of the respiratory tract. Ann Intern Med 77:701–706CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Andrews CP, Coalson JJ, Smith JD (1981) Diagnosis of nosocomial bacterial pneumonia in acute diffuse lung injury. Chest, 80:254–260CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bell RC, Coalson JJ, Smith JD (1983) Multiple organ system failure and infection in adult respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intern Med (1983) 99:293–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chastre J, Fagon JY, Lamer C (1991) Diagnosis of lung infection in intensive care unit patients using the protected specimen Brush technique. In: Vinvent JL (ed) Update in intensive care and emergency medicine 91. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 357–364Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rouby JJ, Poete P, Bodin L (1991) The protected minialveolar lavage technique for the diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia. In: Vincent JL (ed) Update in intensive care and emergency medicine 91. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 365–378Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Geckler RW, Gremillion DH, Mc Allister CK, Ellenbogen C (1977) Microscopy and batteriological comparison of paired sputa and transtracheal aspirates. J Clin Microbiol 6:396–399PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Murray PR, Washington JA (1975) Microscopy and bacteriological anallysis of expectorated sputum. Mayo Clin Proc 50:339–344PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lennette EH, Spaulding EH, Truant JP (1974) In: Truant JP (ed) Manual of clinical microbiology, 2nd edn. American Society for Microbiology Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standard (1985) Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approvated standards. NCCLS Pubblication M7-AGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Van Saene HKF, Stoutenbeek CP, Zandstra DF (1988) Cefotaxime combined with selective digestive decontamination in long-term intensive care unit patients: virtual absence of emergence of resistance (Abstr). In: Vincent JL (ed) Infection control by selective decontamination. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 146Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Unertl K, Ruckdeschel G, Selbmann HK, Jensen U, Forst H, Lenhardt FP, Peter K (1987) Prevention of colonization and respiratory infections in long-term ventilated patients by local antimicrobial prophylaxis. Intensive Care Med 13:106–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Heeg K, Bigos K, Konrad F, Wiedeck H, Wagner H (1988) Colonization and resistance patterns of microbial isolates following SDD in association with short-course Cefotaxime. In: Vincent JL (ed) Infection control by selective decontamination. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 158Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sidow M, Burchardi H, Crozier TA, Ruchel R, Busse C, Seyde WC (1990) The effect of selective decontamination on nosocomial infections, their causative agents and antibiotic resistance in long-term intubated intensive care patients. Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed 25:416–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tetteroo GW, Wagenvoort JH, Ince C, Bruining HA (1990) Effects of selective decontamination on Gram-negative colonization, infections and development of bacterial resistance in esophageal resection. Intensive Care Med 16 [Suppl 3]:S224-S228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Godard J, Gillaume C, Reverdy M-E, Bachmann P, Bui-Xuan B, Nageotte A, Motin J (1990) Intestinal decontamination in a polyvalent ICU. A double-blind study. Intensive Care Med 16:307–311CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Eastway A (1988) Emergence of resistance during Selective Decontamination: Glasgow results. In: Vincent JL (ed) Infection control by selective decontamination. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 154Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Botha P, de Kock MJ, van Vuuren CJ, Fourie S, van Heerden C (1990) Evaluation of clinical isolates ofPseudomonas aeruginosa for ribosomal resistance to Tobramycin. S Afr Med J 78:258–259PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sciarra M, Cavaliere F, Crociani E (1988) Tobramycin levels during selective decontamination of the digestive tract (Abstract). Intensive Care Med 14 [Suppl 1]:S311Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stoutenbeek CP, van Saane HKF, Zandstra DF (1987) The effect of oral non-absorbable antibiotics on the emergence of resistant bacteria in patients in an intensive care unit. J Antimicrob Chemother 19:513–520CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ramsay G, Reidy JJ (1990) Selective decontamination in intensive care practice: a review of clinical experience. Intensive Care Med 16 [Suppl 3]:S217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Christensen GD, Bisno AL, Parisi JJ (1982) Nosocomial septicemia due to multiply antibiotic resistantStaphylococcus epidermidis. Ann Intern Med 96:1–6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Nardi
    • 1
  • U. Valentinis
    • 2
  • A. Proietti
    • 3
  • A. De Monte
    • 1
  • A. Di Silvestre
    • 1
  • R. Muzzi
    • 1
  • R. Peressutti
    • 1
  • M. G. Troncon
    • 2
  • F. Giordano
    • 1
  1. 1.2nd Department of Anaesthesia and ICUHospital of UdineUdineItaly
  2. 2.Department of PharmacologyHospital of UdineUdineItaly
  3. 3.Department of MicrobiologyHospital of UdineUdineItaly

Personalised recommendations