Molecular Breeding

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 5–26 | Cite as

Genetic engineering of reproductive sterility in forest trees

  • Steven H. Strauss
  • William H. Rottmann
  • Amy M. Brunner
  • Lorraine A. Sheppard
Review article


Containment of transgenes inserted into genetically engineered forest trees will probably be necessary before most commercial uses are possible. This is a consequence of (1) high rates of gene dispersal by pollen and seed, (2) proximity of engineered trees in plantations to natural or feral stands of interfertile species, and (3) potentially undesirable ecological effects if certain transgenes become widely dispersed. In addition to gene containment, engineering of complete or male sterility may stimulate faster wood production, reduce production of allergenic pollen, and facilitate hybrid breeding. We review the regulatory and ecological rationale for engineering sterility, potentially useful floral genes, strategies for creating sterility-causing transgenes, and problems peculiar to engineering sterility in forest trees. Each of the two primary options — ablating floral tissuesvia floral promoter-cytotoxin fusions, and disrupting expression of essential floral genes by various methods of gene suppression — has advantages and disadvantages. Because promoters from structural and enzymatic floral-specific genes often work well in heterologous species, ablation methods based on these genes probably will not require cloning of homologs from angiosperm trees. Methods that inhibit gene expression will require cloning of tree genes and may be more prone to epigenetic variability, but should allow assay of transgene efficacy in seedlings. Practical constraints include the requirement for vegetative propagation if complete sterility is engineered and the need for highly stable forms of sterility in long-lived trees. The latter may require suppression of more than one floral gene or employment of more than one genetic mechanism for sterility.

Key words

flowering floral homeotic genes ablation cosuppression antisense transgenes Populus conifer 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Adams WT: Gene dispersal within forest tree populations. New For 6: 217–240 (1992).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allen GC, Hall GE, Childs LC, Weissinger AK, Spiker S, Thompson WF: Scaffold attachment regions increase reporter gene expression in stably transformed plant cells. Plant Cell 5: 603–613 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Allen GS, Owens JN: The Life History of Douglas-fir. Environment Canada, Forestry Service, Ottawa (1972).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Angenent GC, Busscher M, Franken J, Mol JNM, Vantunen AJ: Differential expression of MADS box genes in wild-type and mutant petunia flowers. Plant Cell 4: 983–993 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Angenent GC, Franken J, Busscher M, Colombo L, van Tunen AJ: Petal and stamen formation in petunia is regulated by the homeotic genefbpl. Plant J 4: 101–112 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Atkinson AH, Heath RL, Simpson RL, Clarke AE, Anderson MA: Proteinase inhibitors inNicotiana alata stigmas are derived from a precursor protein which is processed into five homologous inhibitors. Plant Cell 5: 203–213 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bellen HJ, D'Evelyn D, Harvey M, Elledge SJ: Isolation of temperature-sensitive diphtheria toxins in yeast and their effects onDrosophila cells. Development 114: 787–796 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boutry M, Nagy F, Poulsen C, Aoyagi K, Chua N-H: Targeting of bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase to mitochondria in transgenic plants. Nature 328: 340–342 (1987).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bradshaw HD, Stettler RF: Molecular genetics of growth and development inPopulus. 1. Triploidy in hybrid poplars. Theor Appl Genet 86: 301–307 (1900).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Breitenender H, Ferreira F, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K, Ebner C, Breitenbach M, Rumpold H, Kraft D, Scheiner O: Four recombinant isoforms of Cor a I, the major allergen of hazel pollen, show different IgE-binding properties. Eur J Biochem 212: 355–362 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Breyne P, Van Montagu M, Depicker A, Gheysen G: Characterization of a plant scaffold attachment region in a DNA fragment that normalizes transgene expression in tobacco. Plant Cell 4: 463–471 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brusslan JA, Karlin-Neumann GA, Huang L, Tobin EM: AnArabidopsis mutant with a reduced level ofcab140 RNA is a result of cosuppression. Plant Cell 5: 667–677 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cheliak WM, Rogers DL: Integrating biotechnology into tree improvement programs. Can J Forest Res 20: 452–463 (1990).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Coen ES, Carpenter R: The metamorphosis of flowers. Plant Cell 5: 1175–1181 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Coen ES, Romero JM, Doyle S, Elliott R, Murphy G, Carpenter R:FLORICAULA: a homeotic gene required for flower development inAntirrhinum majus. Cell 63: 1311–1322 (1990).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Crawley MJ, Hails RS, Rees M, Kohn D, Buxton J: Ecology of transgenic oilseed rape in natural habitats. Nature 363: 620–623 (1993).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Day C, Miller R, Irish V: Genetic cell ablation to analyse cell interactions duringArabidopsis floral development. Abstract 738. Fourth International Congress of Plant Molecular Biology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (June 19–24, 1994).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    De Block M, Debrouwer D: Engineered fertility control in transgenicBrassica napus L.: histochemical analysis of anther development. Planta 189: 218–225 (1993).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Denis MR, Delourme R, Gourret J-P, Mariani C, Renard M: Expression of engineered nuclear male sterility inBrassica napus. Plant Physiol 101: 1295–1304 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Duke SO, Christy AL, Hess FD, Holt JS: Herbicide-Resistant Crops. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Ames, IA (1991).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eis S, Garman EH, Ebell LF: Relation between cone production and diameter increment of Douglas-fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco], grand fir [Abies grandis (Dougl.) Lindl.], and western white pine (Pinus monticola Dougl.). Can J Bot 43: 1553–1559 (1965).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    El-Kassaby UA, Barclay HJ: Cost of reproduction in Douglas-fir. Can J Bot 70: 1429–1432 (1992).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ellstrand NC, Hoffman CA: Hybridization as an avenue of escape for engineered genes. BioScience 40: 438–442 (1990).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Evans LT: The natural history of crop yield. Am Sci 68: 388–397 (1980).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Falk BW, Bruening G: Will transgenic crops generate new viruses and new diseases? Science 263: 1395–1396 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fielding JM: Branching and Flowering Characteristics of Monterey Pine. Forestry & Timber Bureau Bulletin 37. Commonwealth Government Printer, Canberra, Australia (1960).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Flavell RB: Inactivation of gene expression in plants as a consequence of specific sequence duplication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 3490–3496 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gasser CS, Robinson-Beers K: Pistil development. Plant Cell 5: 1231–1239 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Goldberg RB: Plants: novel developmental processes. Science 240: 1460–1467 (1988).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Goldberg RB, Beals TP, Sanders PM: Anther development: basic principles and practical applications. Plant Cell 5: 1217–1229 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Goldburg J, Rissler J, Shand H, Hassebrook C: Biotechnology's Bitter Harvest: Herbicide-Tolerant Crops and the Threat to Sustainable Agriculture. A Report of the Biotechnology Working Group. Environmental Defense Fund, New York (1990).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Goldman MHS, Goldberg RB, Mariani C: Female sterile tobacco plants are produced by stigma-specific cell ablation. EMBO J 13: 2976–2984 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hackett RM, Lawrene MJ, Franklin FCH: ABrassica S-locus related gene promoter directs expression in both pollen and pistil. Plant J 2: 613–617 (1992).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hanson MR: Plant mitochondrial mutations and male sterility. Annu Rev Genet 25: 461–486 (1991).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hernould M, Suharsono S, Litvak S, Araya A, Mouras A: Male-sterility induction in transgenic tobacco plants with an uneditedatp9 mitochondrial gene from Tobacco. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 2370–2374 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hobbs SLA, Warkentin TD, DeLong CMO: Transgene copy number can be positively or negatively associated with transgene expression. Plant Mol Biol 21: 17–26 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Huijser P, Klein J, Lonnig W-E, Meijer H, Saedler H, Sommer H: Bracteomania, an inflorescence anomaly, is caused by the loss of function of the MADS-box geneSquamosa inAntirrhinum majus. EMBO J 11: 1239–1249 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ishizaki T, Koizumi K, Ikemori R, Ishiyama Y, Kushibiki E: Studies of prevalence of Japanese cedar pollinosis among the residents in a densely cultivated area. Ann Allergy 58: 265–270 (1987).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jorgensen R: Silencing of plant genes by homologous transgenes. AgBiotech News Info 4: 265N-273N (1992).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jorgensen R: The germinal inheritance of epigenetic information in plants. Phil Trans R Soc London B 339: 173–181 (1993).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jouanin L, Brasiliero ACM, Leple JC, Cornu D: Genetic transformation: a short review of methods and their applications, results and perspectives for forest trees. Ann Sci For 50: 325–336 (1993).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kandasamy MK, Thorsness MK, Rundle SJ, Goldberg ML, Nasrallah JB, Nasrallah ME: Ablation of papillar cell function inBrassica flowers results in the loss of stigma receptivity to pollination. Plant Cell 5: 263–275 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Keeler KH: Can genetically engineered crops become weeds? Bio/Technology 7: 1134–1139 (1989).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kilby NJ, Leyser HMO, Furner J: Promoter methylation and progressive transgene inactivation inArabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol 20: 103–112 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kilby NJ, Smaith MR, Murray JAH: Site-specific recombinases: tools for genome engineering. Trends Genet 9: 413–421 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Koltunow AM, Truettner J, Cox KH, Wallroth M, Goldberg RB: Different temporal and spatial gene expression patterns occur during anther development. Plant Cell 2: 1201–1224 (1990).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kooter JM, Mol JNM: Trans-inactivation of gene expression in plants. Curr Opin Biotechnol 4: 166–171 (1993).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ledig FT: Conservation strategies for forest gene resources. For Ecol Manage 14: 77–90 (1986).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ledig FT, Linzer DIH: Fuel crop breeding. Chemtech 8: 18–27 (1978).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    LeMaistre CF, Craig FE, Meneghetti C, McMullin B, Parker K, Reuben J, Boldt DH, Rosenblum F, Woodworth T: Phase I trial of 90-minute infusion of the fusion toxin DAB486IL-2 in hematological cancers. Cancer Res 53: 3930–3934 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Levings CS III: Thoughts on cytoplasmic male sterility incms-T maize. Plant Cell 5: 1285–1290 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lindbo JA, Dougherty WG: Untranslatable transcripts of the tobacco etch virus coat protein gene sequence can interfere with tobacco etch virus replication in transgenic plants and protoplasts. Virology 189: 725–733 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Lindbo JA, Silva-Rosales L, Proesting WM, Dougherty WG: Induction of a highly resistant antiviral state in transgenic plants: implications for regulation of gene expression and virus resistance. Plant Cell 5: 1749–1759 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ma H, Yanofsky MF, Meyerowitz EM: AGLI-AGL6, anArabidopsis gene family with similarity to floral homeotic and transcription factor genes. Genes Devel 5: 484–495 (1991).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Mandel MA, Bowman JL, Kempin SA, Ma H, Meyerowitz EM, Yanofsky MF: Manipulation of flower structure in transgenic tobacco. Cell 71: 133–143 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mandel MA, Gustafson-Brown C, Savidge B, Yanofsky MF: Molecular characterization of theArabidopsis floral homeotic geneAPETALA1. Nature 360: 273–277 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Mariani C, DeBeuckeleer M, Truettner J, Leemans J, Goldberg RB: Induction of male sterility in plants by a chimaeric ribonuclease gene. Nature 347: 737–741 (1990).Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Mariani C, Gossele V, De Beuckeleer M, De Block M, Goldberg RB, De Greef W, Leemans J: A chimaeric ribonuclease-inhibitor gene restores fertility to malesterile plants. Nature 357: 384–387 (1992).Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Matzke M, Matzke AJM: Genomic imprinting in plants: parental effects and trans-inactivation phenomena. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 44: 53–76 (1993).Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Maxwell IH, Golde LM, Maxwell F: Expression of the diphtheria toxin A-chain coding sequence under the control of promoters and enhancers from immunoglobulin genes as a means of directing toxicity toβ-lymphoid cells. Cancer Res 51: 4288–4304 (1991).Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    McCormick S: Male gametophyte development. Plant Cell 5: 1265–1275 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    McGaughey WH, Whalon ME: Managing insect resistance toBacillus thuringiensis toxins. Science 258: 1451–1455 (1992).Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Mizukami Y, Ma H: Ectopic expression of the floral homeotic geneAgamous in transgenicArabidopsis plants alters floral organ identity. Cell 71: 119–131 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Mlynárová L, Loonen A, Heidens J, Jansen RC, Keizer P, Stiekema WJ, Nap J-P: Reduced position effect in mature transgenic plants conferred by the chicken lysozyme matrix-associated region. Plant Cell 6: 417–426 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Mol JNM, van Blokland R, de Lange P, Kooter J: Post-transcriptional inhibition of gene expression: Sense and antisense genes. In: Paszkowski J (ed) Homologous Recombination and Gene Silencing in Plants, pp. 309–334. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1994).Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Morris RF: The effects of flowering on the foliage production and growth of balsam fir. For Chron 27: 40–57 (1951).Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Muschietti J, Dircks L, Vancanneyt G, McCormick S: LAT52 protein is essential for tomato pollen development: pollen expressing antisenseLAT52 RNA hydrates and germinates abnormally and cannot achieve fertilization. Plant J 6: 321–338 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Nasrallah JB, Nasrallah ME: Pollen-stigma signalling in the sporophytic self-incompatibility response. Plant Cell 5: 1325–1335 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Nasrallah JB, Nishio T, Nasarallah ME: The self-incompatibility genes ofBrassica: expression and use in ablation of floral tissues. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 42: 393–422 (1991).Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    NBIAP (National Biological Impact Assessment Program): EPA works toward plant-pesticide regulation. NBIAP News Rep (February 1994).Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Newbigin E, Anderson MA, Clarke AE: Gametophytic self-incompatibility systems. Plant Cell 5: 1315–1324 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Nyers LS, Doerksen AH, Krupkin AB, Strauss SH: Floral MADS-box genes in poplar, pine, and Douglas-fir. J Cell Biochem Suppl 17B: 22 (1993).Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Offringa R, Franke van Dijk MEI, de Groot MJA, van den Elzen PJM, Hooykaas PJJ: Nonreciprocal homologous recombination betweenAgrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 7346–7350 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Okamuro J, den Boer B, Jofuku D: Regulation ofArabidopsis flower development. Plant Cell 5: 1183–1193 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    OSTP (Office of Science and Technology Policy): Co-ordinated framework for regulation of biotechnology; Announcement of policy and notice for public comment. Fed Reg 51: 23302–23350 (June 26, 1986).Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Pappenheimer AM Jr: Diphtheria toxin. Annu Rev Biochem 46: 69–94 (1977).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Paul W, Hodge R, Smartt S, Draper J, Scott R: The isolation and characterization of the tapetum-specificArabidopsis thaliana A9 gene. Plant Mol Biol 19: 611–622 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Perrins J, Williamson M, Fitter A: A survey of differing views of weed classification: implications for regulation of introductions. Biol Conserv 60: 47–56 (1992).Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Pickett FB, Kelly A, Bonnlander M, Meeks-Wagner DR: Isolation and characterization of the tobacco homolog of theFLORICAULA andLEAFY genes. J Cell Biochem Suppl 17B: 22 (1993).Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Pnueli L, Hareven D, Broday L, Hurwitz C, Lifschitz E: TheTM5 MADS box gene mediates organ differentiation in the three inner whorls of tomato flowers. Plant Cell 6: 175–186 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Pnueli L, Hareven D, Rounsley AD, Yanofsky MF: Isolation of the tomatoAgamous geneTAGI and analysis of its homeotic role in transgenic plants. Plant Cell 6: 163–173 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Pryor LD, Willing RR: Growing and Breeding Poplar in Australia. Canberra Publishing and Printing Co., Canberra, Australia (1982).Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Raffa KF: Genetic engineering of trees to enhance resistance to insects. BioScience 39: 524–534 (1989).Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Raybould AF, Gray AJ: Genetically modified crops and hybridization with wild relatives: a UK perspective. J Appl Ecol 30: 199–219 (1993).Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Reiser L, Modrusan Z, Margossian L, Haughn G, Feldmann K, Fischer RL: Molecular cloning ofBEL1, a gene required for ovule development inArabidopsis thaliana. Abstract 519. Fourth International Congress of Plant Molecular Biology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (June 19–24, 1994).Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Reynaerts A, Van de Wiele H, De Sutter G, Janssens J: Engineered genes for fertility control and their application in hybrid seed production. Sci Hortic 55: 125–139 (1993).Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Rissler J, Mellon M: Perils amidst the Promise: Ecological Risks of Transgenic Crops in a Global Market. Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, MA (1993).Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Rottmann WH, Boes TK, Strauss SH: Structure and expression of aLEAFY homolog fromPopulus. Cell Biochem Suppl 17B: 23 (1993).Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Rutledge B, Côté C, Pitel J, Sunohara G: Characterization of the MADS box gene family from black spruce using PCR cloning. J Cell Biochem Suppl 17B: 45 (1993).Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Schmülling T, Rohrig H, Pilz S, Walden R, Schell J: Resoration of fertility by antisense RNA in genetically engineered male sterile tobacco plants. Mol Gen Genet 237: 385–394 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Schultz EA, Pickett FB, Haughn GW: TheFLO10 gene product regulates expression domain of homeotic genesAP3 andPI inArabidopsis flowers. Plant Cell 2: 1221–1237 (1991).Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Sederoff RR, Ledig FT: Increasing forest productivity and value through biotechnology. In: Forest Potentials: Productivity and Value. Weyerhaeuser Science Symposium No. 4, pp. 253–276. Tacoma, WA (1985).Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Sedgley M, Griffin AR: Sexual Reproduction of Tree Crops. Academic Press, London (1989).Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Seidler RJ, Levin M: Potential ecological and nontarget effects of transgenic plant gene products on agriculture, silviculture, and natural ecosystems: general introduction. Mol Ecol 3: 1–3 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Sheppard L, Rottmann WH, Strauss SH: Cloning and characterization of MADS-box genes in black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa). Poster presented at Proc Int Union For Res Organ Mol Genet Workshop, Portland, ME (May 20–23, 1994).Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Stettler RF, Koster R, Steenackers V: Interspecific crossability studies in poplars. Theoret Appl Genet 58: 273–282 (1980).Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Strauss SH, Howe GT, Goldfarb G: Prospects for genetic engineering of insect resistance in forest trees. For Ecol Manage 43: 181–209 (1991).Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Taira H, Teranishi H, Kenda Y: A case study of male sterility in sugi (Cryptomeria japonica). J Jpn For Soc 75: 377–379 (1993).Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Tandre K, Sundås A, Black S, Engström P: The coniferPicea abies has a homologue to theArabidopsis agamous-like genes. J Cell Biochem Suppl 17B: 16 (1993).Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Taylor LP, Jorgensen R: Conditional male-fertility in chalcone synthase-deficient petunia. J Hered 83: 11–17 (1992).Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Teich AH: Growth reduction due to cone crops on precocious white spruce provenances. Environ Can Bi-mon Res Notes 31(1): 6 (1975).Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Thorsness MK, Kandasamy MK, Nasrallah ME, Nasrallah JB: ABrassica S-locus gene promoter targets toxic gene expression and cell death to the pistil and pollen of transgenicNicotiana. Devel Biol 143: 173–184 (1991).Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Thorsness MK, Kandasamy MK, Nasrallah ME, Nasrallah JB: Genetic ablation of floral cells inArabidopsis. Plant Cell 5: 253–261 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Tiedje JM, Colwell RK, Grossman YL, Hodson RE, Lenski RE, Mack RN, Regal PJ: The planned introduction of genetically engineered organisms: ecological considerations and recommendations. Ecology 70: 298–315 (1989).Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Tsuchimoto S, van der Krol AR, Chua N: Ectopic expression ofpMADS3 in transgenic petunia phenocopies the petuniablind mutant. Plant Cell 5: 843–853 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Turgut K, Barsby T, Craze M, Freeman J, Hodge R, Paul W, Scott R: The highly expressed tapetum-specific A9 gene is not required for male fertility inBrassica napus. Plant Mol Biol 24: 97–104 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    van Blokland R, van der Geest N, Mol JNM, Kooter JM: Transgene-mediated suppression of chalcone synthase expression inPetunia hybrida results from an increase of RNA turnover. Plant J, in press (1994).Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Van der Krol AR, Chua N-H: Flower development inPetunia. Plant Cell 5: 1195–1203 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    van der Meer IM, Stam ME, van Tunen AJ, Mol JNM, Stuitje AR: Antisense inhibition of flavanoid biosynthesis in petunia anthers results in male sterility. Plant Cell 4: 253–262 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    van Tunen AJ, Koes RE, Spelt CE, van der Krol AR, Stuitje AR, Mol JNM: Cloning of the two chalcone synthase flavanone isomerase genes fromPetunia hybrida: coordinate, light-regulated and differential expression of flavonoid genes. EMBO J 7: 1257–1263 (1988).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    von Allmen J-M, Rottmann WH, Gengenbach BG, Harvey AJ, Lonsdale DM: Transfer of methomyl and HmT-toxin sensitivity from T-cytoplasm maize to tobacco. Mol Gen Genet 229: 405–412 (1991).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Ward ER, Ryals JA, Miflin BJ: Chemical regulation of transgene expression in plants. Plant Mol Biol 22: 361–366 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Weigel D, Alvarez J, Smyth DR, Yanofsky MF, Meyerowitz EM:LEAFY controls floral meristem identity inArabidopsis. Cell 69: 843–859 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Weising K, Schell J, Kahl G: Foreign genes in plants: transfer, structure, expression, and applications. Annu Rev Genet 22: 421–477 (1988).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Whetten R, Sederoff R: Genetic engineering of wood. For Ecol Manag 43: 301–316 (1991).Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Williams EG, Clarke AE, Knox RB (eds): Genetic Control of Self Incompatibility and Reproductive Development in Flowering Plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1994).Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Worrall D, Hird DL, Hodge R, Paul W, Draper J, Scott R: Premature dissolution of the microsporocyte callose wall causes male sterility in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell 4: 759–771 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Ylstra B, Busscher J, Franken J, Hollman PCH, Mol JNM, van Tunen AJ: Flavonols and fertilization inPetunia hybrida: localization and mode of action during pollen tube growth. Plant J 6: 201–212 (1994).Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Zobel B, Talbert J: Applied Forest Tree Improvement. John Wiley, New York (1984).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven H. Strauss
    • 1
  • William H. Rottmann
    • 1
  • Amy M. Brunner
    • 1
  • Lorraine A. Sheppard
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forest ScienceOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations