Higher Education

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 411–427 | Cite as

Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment

  • Paul Ramsden
Article

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of the organisation of curricula, teaching, and assessment on student learning and looks at the different demands which different academic environments make on their students. After a brief review of research into learning contexts in higher education, data from a course perceptions questionnaire are presented. The principal dimensions which students themselves use to characterise academic environments are identified. The perceptions of students in six departments at one British university are compared; it is concluded that students in different subject areas see themselves to be studying in markedly different environments. The results also suggest students' evaluations of the teaching and the courses in each department.

Data from the course perceptions questionnaire are supported and amplified by a preliminary analysis of results from semi-structured interviews of students in the six departments. The most important factor to emerge from the item analysis — the degree to which students feel that their teachers provide a facilitant atmosphere for learning — is confirmed. Students' perceptions of their departments and their teachers are shown to exert important influences on their approaches to learning. It is also suggested that a student's perception of a particular learning task influences the level at which he tackles it.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Astin, A. W. (1968).The College Environment. Washinton, D.C.: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, H. S., Geer, B., and Hughes, E. C. (1968).Making the Grade: The Academic Side of College Life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein, B. B. (1971). “On the Classification and Framing of Educational Knowledge,” in M. F. D. Young, ed.,Knowledge and Control. pp. 47–69, London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Biggs, J. B. (1970). “Faculty patterns in study behaviour,”Australian Journal of Psychology 22 (2): 161–174.Google Scholar
  5. Centra, J. A. (1976). “Student Ratings of Instruction and their Relationship to Student Learning” Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, B. R. and Trow, M. (1966). “The Organisational Context” in T. M. Newcomb and E. K. Wilson, eds.,College Peer Groups: Problems and Prospects for Research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  7. Entwistle, N. J. and Wilson, J. D. (1977).Degrees of Excellence: The Academic Achievement Game. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
  8. Gaff, J. G. and Wilson, R. C. (1971). “Faculty cultures and interdisciplinary study,”Journal of Higher Education 42(3): 186–201.Google Scholar
  9. Gaff, J. G., Crombag, H. F. M., and Chang, T. M. (1976). “Environments for learning in a Dutch university,”Higher Education 5: 285–299.Google Scholar
  10. Halsey, A. H. and Trow, M. (1971).The British Academics. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  11. Hartnett, R. T. and Centra, J. A. (1977). “The effects of academic departments on student learning,”Journal of Higher Education 48(5): 491–507.Google Scholar
  12. Hermans, B. M. J. (1979). “Student and System: Academic Success and Study Problems in Relation with Characteristics of the Academic Environment and of the Students,” in E. A. van Trotsenburg, ed.,Higher Education: A Field of Study. 5 vols. Bern: Verlag Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  13. Long, S. (1978). “Student types and the evaluation of the university,”Higher Education 6: 417–436.Google Scholar
  14. Marton, F. (1975a). “What Does it Take to Learn?” in N. J. Entwistle and D. J. Hounsell, eds.,How Students Learn. Lancaster: IPCE.Google Scholar
  15. Marton, F. (1975b).Non-verbatim Learning I: Level of Processing and Level of Outcome. Report No. 39, Institute of Education, University of Göteborg.Google Scholar
  16. Marton, F. and Säljö, R. (1976). “On qualitative differences in learning: I — Outcome and process”British Journal of Educational Psychology 46: 4–11.Google Scholar
  17. Miller, C. M. L. and Parlett, M. (1974).Up to the Mark: A Study of the Examination Game. London: SRHE.Google Scholar
  18. Pace, C. R. (1967).College and University Environment Scales. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  19. Percy, K. A. and Ramsden, P. (1979).Freedom and Learning in Higher Education. (provisional title) Guildford: SRHE. (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  20. Peterson, R. E. (1965). “On a Typology of College Students” Research Bulletin, RB 65-9. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  21. Ramsden, P. (1976).Course Evaluation in Higher Education. Unpublished MPhil dissertation, CNAA.Google Scholar
  22. Ramsden, P. (1979). “Identifying dimensions of learning environments in higher education,” (in preparation).Google Scholar
  23. Rogers, C. (1969).Freedom to Learn. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill.Google Scholar
  24. Snyder, B. R. (1971).The Hidden Curriculum. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  25. Stern, C. G. (1970).People in Context. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Wankowski, J. A. (1973).Temperament, Motivation and Academic Achievement. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Educational Survey.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Ramsden
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Research and Development in Post-Compulsory EducationUniversity of LancasterLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations