Skip to main content
Log in

Classification and evaluation of the functional results of replanted parts of the hand at the Prince of Wales Hospital and the Prince of Wales Children's Hospital: 1984 to 1988

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes a simple method of classification and evaluation of the functional results of replanted and revascularized parts in the hand. The results are presented in graphic form and have been analyzed to correlate various factors: injured part, cause, and zone (level) of injury. The type of injury, ischemic time and age have been studied in more detail to determine their influence of the final functional result. The series contains 187 amputated and devascularized parts of the hand in 119 patients who have undergone surgery at the Prince of Wales Hospital from 1984 through 1988. The length of cold or warm ischemic times, up to 16 hours in this series, while not affecting survival of the amputated part, does adversely affect the functional result. The survival rate of replanted parts in children was significantly less favorable than in adults, but the functional results were uniformly superior.

Résumé

Cet article décrit une méthode simple de classification et d'évaluation des résultats fonctionnels des structures de la main réimplantées ou revascularisées en urgence. Les résultats sont présentés sous forme de graphique et ont été analysés pour établir une corrélation des facteurs suivants: partie lésée, cause, niveau de la lésion. Ont été étudiés plus en détail le type de lésion, le temps d'ischemic et l'âge du patient por déterminer leur influence sur les résultats. Cette série concerne 187 amputations ou cas de dévascularisations de la main chez 119 patients tous traités à l'Hôpital Prince of Wales entre 1984 et 1988. Il existe des indices que la durée de l'ischémie chaude ou froide, jusqu'à 16 heures dans cette série, influence de façon négative le résultat fonctionnel, indépendemment des possibilités de survie de la ré implantation. Le taux de survie des amputations réimplantées chez l'enfant est inférieur à celui des amputations réimplantées chez l'adulte, mais les résultats fonctionnels sont infiniment supérieurs.

Resumen

El presente trabajo describe un método simple de clasificación y evaluatión de los resultados funcionales de partes reimplantadas y revascularizadas de la mano. Los resulados, que se presentan en forma gráfica, fueron analizados para correlacionar diversos factores: la parte lesionada, la causa y la zona (o nivel) de la lesión. El tipo de la lesión, la hora y la duración de la isquemia fueron estudiados en mayor detalle para determinar su influencia sobre el resultado funcional final. La serie está conformada por 187 partes amputadas y devascularizadas de la mano en 119 pacientes sometidos a cirugía en el Hospital Príncipe de Gales entre 1984 y 1988. Los resultados de este estudio indican que el tiempo de isquemia, fría o caliente hasta 16 horas, aunque no afecta la supervivencia de la parte afectada, sí afecta en forma adversa el resultado funcional. La tasa de supervivencia de las partes reimplatadas en niños apareció significativamente menos favorable que en los adultos, pero los resultados funcionales fueron uniformemente superiores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell, Sir Charles: Introductory chapter. In The Hand: Its Mechanism and Vital Endowments as Evincing Design. London, William Pickering, 1833, p13. Reproduced in The Classics of Surgery Library, Adams, Lesley B. Jr.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lendvay, P.G.: Replacement of the amputated digit. Br. J. Plast. Surg.26:398, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buncke, H.J. Jr.: American Replantation Mission to China. Replantation Surgery in China: Report of the American Replantation Mission to China. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.52:476, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carroll, D.: A quantitative test of upper extremity function. J. Chronic Dis.18:479, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  5. Weiland, A., Villarreal-Rios, A., Kleinen, H., Kutz, J., Atasy, E., Lister, G.J.: Replantation of digits and hands: Analysis of surgical techniques and functional results in 71 patients with 86 replantations. J. Hand Surg.2:1, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, C.W.: Extremity replantation. World J. Surg.2:513, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berger, A., Millesi, H.: Functional results from replantation surgery: A five year report from the Viennese replantation team. Aust. N.Z. J. Surg.50:244, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tamai, S.: 20 years experience of limb replantation. Review of 293 upper extremity replants. J. Hand Surg.7:549, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jones, J., Schenke, R., Chesney, R.J.: Digital replantation and amputation: Comparison of function. J. Hand Surg.7:183, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tamai, S., Michon, J., Tupper, J., Fleming, J.: Report of Subcommittee on Replantation. First International Journal Supplement Commemorating Second International Congress of IFSSH. J. Hand Surg.8:730, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  11. Blomen, I., Blomqvist, G., Ejesskar, A., Fogdestam, I., Volkman, R., Edshage, S.: Hand function after replantation or revascularisation of upper extremity injuries. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.22:93, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rank, B.K., Wakefleld, A.R.: General considerations of primary treatment for open hand injuries. In Surgery of Repair as Applied to Hand Injuries, B.K. Rank, A.R. Wakefield, editors, 2nd Edition. Edinburgh-London, E and S Livingstone Ltd., 1960, pp. 63–64

    Google Scholar 

  13. Daniel, K.D., Terzis, J.K.: Replantation of upper extremity amputations. In Reconstructive Microsurgery, K.D. Daniel, J.K. Terzis, editors, Boston, Little Brown and Company, 1977, p. 128

    Google Scholar 

  14. Beimer, E.: Definitions and classifications in replantation surgery. Br. J. Plast. Surg.33:164, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  15. Urbaniak, J.R.: Replantation. In Operative Hand Surgery, 2nd edition, D.P. Green, editor, New York-Edinburgh-London-Melbourne, Churchill Livingstone, 1988, p. 1105

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hamilton, R.B., O'Brien, B.McC., Morrison, W.A., McLeod, A.M.: Survival factors in replantation and revascularisation of the amputated thumb: 10 years experience. Scand J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.18:163, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chiu, H.-Y., Chen, M.-T.: Revascularisation of digits after 33 hours of warm ischemia time. A case report. J. Hand Surg.9A:63, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  18. Iglesias, M., Serrano, A.: Replantation of amputated segments after prolonged ischemia. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.85:425, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wei, F.-C., Chang, Y.-L., Chen, H.-C., Chuang, C.-C.: Three successful digital replantations in a patient after 84, 86, and 94 hours of cold ischemia time. Plast. Recontr. Surg.82:346, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  20. Van Beek, A.L., Wavak, P.W., Zook, E.G.: Microvascular surgery in young children. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.63:457, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  21. Urbaniak, J.R.: Replantation in children. In Pediatric Plastic Surgery, D. Serafin, G.S. Georgiade, editors, St. Louis-Toronto-Princeton, 1984, p. 1168

  22. Goldner, R.D., Fitch, R.D., Nunley, J.A., Aitken, M.S., Urbaniak, J.R.: Demographics and replantation. J. Hand Surg.12A:961, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  23. May, J.W.: Digit replantation with full survival after 28 hours of cold ischemia. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.67:566, 1981

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Milroy, B.C., Sackelariou, R.P., Lendvay, P.G. et al. Classification and evaluation of the functional results of replanted parts of the hand at the Prince of Wales Hospital and the Prince of Wales Children's Hospital: 1984 to 1988. World J. Surg. 15, 446–451 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01675639

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01675639

Keywords

Navigation