Advertisement

Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 169–184 | Cite as

Cultural patterns in Dutch and Surinam nonverbal behavior: An analysis of simulated police/citizen encounters

  • Aldert Vrij
  • Frans Willem Winkel
Article

Abstract

Differences in nonverbal behavioral patterns in a simulated police interview setting were examined. One group of subjects was asked to tell the truth to a police officer whereas the other group was asked to deceive the officer. Major differences between our study and other deception studies include the distinction between nonverbal behavior displayed while listening and while speaking, and the inclusion of black subjects. Results show that there are differences in nonverbal behavior between deceivers and those who tell the truth, and generally support the finding that deception is associated with changes in vocal characteristics and hand and arm movements. However, differences in hand and arm movements occurred only while the deceiver was listening. Furthermore, findings showed that blacks looked less frequently at their discussion partner, smiled and laughed more, made more speech disturbances, spoke slower, and with more pitch raises, and were livelier in the sense that they made more trunk movements and gestures than whites.

Keywords

Social Psychology Police Officer Behavioral Pattern Nonverbal Behavior Trunk Movement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aalberts, M.M.L., & Kamminga, E.M. (1983).Politie en allochtonen. Den Haag: Staatsdrukkerij.Google Scholar
  2. Bond, C.F., Kahler, K.N., & Paolicelli, L.M. (1985). The miscommunication of deception: an adaptive perspective.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21 331–345.Google Scholar
  3. Brooks, C.I., Church, M.A., & Fraser, L. (1986). Effects of duration of eye contact on judgments of personality characteristics.The Journal of Social Psychology, 126 71–78.Google Scholar
  4. Burgoon, J.K., Manusov, V., Mineo, P., & Hale, J.L. (1985). Effects of gaze on hiring, credibility, attraction and relational message interpretation.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 9 133–147.Google Scholar
  5. DePaulo, B.M., & Kirkendol, S.E. (1989). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception. In J.C. Yuille (Ed.),Credibility assessment. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. DePaulo, B.M., & Rosenthal, R. (1979). Telling lies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 1713–1722.Google Scholar
  7. DePaulo, B.M., Stone, J.L., & Lassiter, G.D. (1985). Deceiving and detecting deceit. In B.R. Schenkler (Ed.),The self and social life. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  8. Dors, H.G. (1979). Surinaamse Nederlanders en hun achtergrond.Algemeen Politie Blad, 127 131–136.Google Scholar
  9. Duncan, S., & Fiske, D.W. (1977)Face to face interaction: research methods and theory. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Duncan, S., & Rosenthal, R. (1968) Vocal emphasis in experimenters' instruction reading as unintended determinants of subjects' response.Language and Speech, 11 20–26.Google Scholar
  11. Ekman, P. (1988). Lying and nonverbal behavior: theoretical issues and new findings.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12 163–176.Google Scholar
  12. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. (1969) Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception.Psychiatry, 32 88–106.Google Scholar
  13. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. (1974). Detecting deception from the body or face.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29 288–298.Google Scholar
  14. Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., & O'Sullivan, M. (1988). Smiles when lying.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 414–420.Google Scholar
  15. Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., O'Sullivan, M., & Scherer, K. (1980). Relative importance of face, body and speech in judgments of personality and affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38 270–277.Google Scholar
  16. Feldman, R.S. (1976). Nonverbal disclosure of teacher deception and interpersonal affect.Journal of Educational Psychology, 68 807–816.Google Scholar
  17. Fugita, S.S., Wexley, K.N., & Hollery, J.M. (1979). Black-white differences in nonverbal behavior in an interview setting.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15 453–469.Google Scholar
  18. Garratt, G.A., Baxter, J.C., & Rozelle, R.M. (1981). Training university police in black-American nonverbal behavior.The Journal of Social Psychology, 113 217–229.Google Scholar
  19. Gordon, R.A., Baxter, J.C., Rozelle, R.M., & Druckman, D. (1987). Expectations of honest, evasive and deceptive nonverbal behavior.Journal of Social Psychology, 127 231–233.Google Scholar
  20. Halberstadt, A.G., & Saitta, M.B. (1987). Gender, nonverbal behavior and perceived dominance: a test of the theory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 257–272.Google Scholar
  21. Hall, E.T. (1959).The silent language. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  22. Hall, E.T. (1966).The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  23. Harrigan, J.A., Kues, J.R., Steffen, J., & Rosenthal, R. (1987). Self-touching and impressions of others.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13 497–512.Google Scholar
  24. Ickes, W. (1984). Compositions in black and white: determinants of interaction in interracial dyads.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 330–341.Google Scholar
  25. Knapp, M.L., Hart, R.P., & Dennis, H.S. (1974). An exploration of deception as a communication construct.Human Communication Research, 1 15–29.Google Scholar
  26. Köhnken, G. (1989). Behavioral correlates of statement credebility: theories, paradigms and results. In H. Wegener, F. Lösel, & I. Haisch (Eds.),Criminal behavior and the justice system: psychological perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  27. Koppelaar, L., Winkel, F.W., & van der Steen, J.C. (1986). Psychologische kanttekeningen bij art 27 Sv.: een experiment rond etnische origine, ritmisch gedrag en verdacht zijn.Delikt en Delinkwent, 16 25–38.Google Scholar
  28. Kraut, R.E., & Poe, D. (1980). On the line: the deception judgements of customs inspectors and laymen.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 380–391.Google Scholar
  29. LaFrance, M., & Mayo, C. (1976). Racial differences in gaze behavior during conversations: two systematic observational studies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33 547–552.Google Scholar
  30. Lass, N.J., Mertz, P., & Kimmel, K.L. (1978). The effect of temporal speech alterations on speaker race and sex identifications.Language and Speech, 21 279–291.Google Scholar
  31. Loveday, L. (1981). Pitch, politeness and sexual role: an exploratory investigation into the pitch correlates of English and Japanese politeness formulae.Language and Speech, 24 71–88.Google Scholar
  32. Mahl, G.F. (1956). Disturbances and silences in the patient's speech in psychotherapy.Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 53 1–15.Google Scholar
  33. McClintock, C.C., & Hunt, R.G. (1975). Nonverbal indicators of affect and deception in an interview setting.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5 54–67.Google Scholar
  34. Mehrabian, A. (1972).Nonverbal communication. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
  35. O'Sullivan, M., Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. (1988). The effect of comparisons on detecting deceit.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12 203–216.Google Scholar
  36. Pennington, D.L. (1979). Black-white communication: an assessment of research. In M.L. Asante, E. Newmark, & C.A. Blake (Eds.),Handbook of intercultural communication. Beverly Hills: Sage publications.Google Scholar
  37. Riggio, R.E., & Friedman, H.S. (1983). Impression formation: the role of expressive behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 649–660.Google Scholar
  38. Rosenfeld, H.M. Instrumental affiliative functions of facial and gestural expressions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 65–72.Google Scholar
  39. Siegman, A.W. (1985). Expressive correlates of affective states and traits. In A.W. Siegman, & S. Feldstein (Eds.),Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, A. (1983). Nonverbal communication among black female dyads: an assessment of intimacy, gender and race.Journal of Social Issues, 39 55–67.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, D.E., Willis, F.N., & Gier, J.A. (1980). Success and interpersonal touch in a competitive setting.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 5 26–34.Google Scholar
  42. Vrugt, A. (1983).Betekenistoekenning aan nonverbale communicatie. Academisch proefschrift. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  43. Vrij, A., Winkel, F.W., & Koppelaar L. (1991). Interactie tussen politiefunctionarissen en allochtone burgers: twee studies naar de frequentie en het effect van aan—en wegkijken op de impressieformatie.Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 46 8–20.Google Scholar
  44. Willis, F.N., Reeves, D.L., & Buchanan, D.R. (1976). Interpersonal touch in high school relative to sex and race.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43 843–847.Google Scholar
  45. Willis, F.N., Rinck, C.M., & Dean, L.M. (1978). Interpersonal touch among adults in cafetaria lines.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47 1147–1152.Google Scholar
  46. Winkel, F.W., & Vrij, A. (1990). Nonverbal behavior in a crosscultural dyad: the frequency and effects of gaze aversion in police-black encounters.Social Behaviour: an International Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5 335–350.Google Scholar
  47. Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B.M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 14). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  48. Zuckerman, M., & Driver, R.E. (1985). Telling lies: verbal and nonverbal correlates of deception. In A.W. Siegman, & S. Feldstein (Eds.),Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aldert Vrij
    • 1
  • Frans Willem Winkel
  1. 1.Department of Social PsychologyVrije Universiteit, AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations