Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 715–734 | Cite as

Family process and child anxiety and aggression: An observational analysis

  • Mark R. Dadds
  • Paula M. Barrett
  • Ronald M. Rapee
  • Sharon Ryan


Barrett, Rapee, Dadds, and Ryan (1996) described a phenomenon whereby family discussions magnified the style of children's problem solving in a way characteristic of their particular clinical diagnosis. That is, anxious children became more avoidant, aggressive children more aggressive, and nonclinic children more prosocial, after discussing ambiguous hypothetical situations with their parents. This study examined specific sequences of communications exchanged between parents and children hypothesized to underlie this family exacerbation of child cognitive style. Family discussions were videotaped and categorized for groups of anxious, aggressive, and nonclinic children and their parents. Results revealed differences between groups of parents in frequency of agreeing with and listening to their child and the frequency of pointing out positive consequences. Conditional probability analyses showed that parents of anxious children were more likely to reciprocate avoidance, while parents of nonclinic children were more likely to agree with and listen to prosocial plans from their child. Differences in parent behaviors observed during the family discussions were reliably associated with the child's response to the ambiguous situation proposed after the family discussion. Results support a model of developmental anxiety and aggression that emphasizes the interaction of family processes and social-cognitive development in the child.


Clinical Diagnosis Conditional Probability Parent Behavior Probability Analysis Specific Sequence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbroch, C. S. (1991).Manual for The Revised Child Behavior Checklist. Burlington: University of Vermont.Google Scholar
  2. Allison, P. D., & Liker, J. K. (1982). Analyzing sequential categorical data on dyadic interaction: A comment on Gottman.Psychological Bulletin, 91, 393–403.Google Scholar
  3. Barrett, P. M., Dadds, M. R., Rapee, R. M., & Ryan, S. (1996). Family treatment of childhood anxiety disorders: A controlled trial.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 333–342.Google Scholar
  4. Barrett, P. M., Rapee, R. M., Dadds, M. R., & Ryan, S. M. (1996). Family enhancement of cognitive style in anxious and aggressive children: Threat bias and the FEAR effect.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 24, 187–203.Google Scholar
  5. Chorpita, B., Albano, A. M., & Barlow, D. H. (1993, November).Family influences on cognitive processing in children with anxiety: A preliminary study. Paper presented at the 27th Convention of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  6. Dadds, M. R., Heard, P. M., & Rapee, R. M. (1991) Anxiety disorders in children.International Review of Psychiatry, 3, 231–241.Google Scholar
  7. Dadds, M. R., & Powell, M. B. (1991). The relationship of interparental conflict and marital adjustment to aggression, anxiety and immaturity in aggressive and nonclinic children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 19, 553–567.Google Scholar
  8. Dadds, M. R., Ryan, S., & Barrett, P. M. (1993).The Family Anxiety Coding Schedule. Manuscript available from Mark Dadds, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Australia, 4111.Google Scholar
  9. Daniel, A. (1983).Power, privilege, and prestige. Melbourne: Longman-Cheshire.Google Scholar
  10. Dumas, J. E. (1986). Controlling for autocorrelation in social interaction analysis.Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 100, 125–127.Google Scholar
  11. Goodyer, I. N. (1990). Family relationships, life events and child psychopathology.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiarty, 31, 161–192.Google Scholar
  12. Gottman, J. M. (1980). Analyzing for sequential connection and assessing interobserver reliability for the sequential analysis of observational data.Behavioral Assessment, 2, 361–368.Google Scholar
  13. Kazdin, A. E. (1987).Conduct disorder in childhood and adolescence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. King, N. J., Hamilton, D. J., & Ollendick, T. H. (1988)Children's phobias: A behavioral perspective. Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Krohne, H. W., & Hock, M. (1991). Relationships between restrictive mother-child interactions and anxiety of the child.Anxiety Research, 4, 109–124.Google Scholar
  16. Morris, R. H., & Kratchowill, T. R. (1983).Treating children's fears and phobias. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  17. Rapee, R. M. (1991). Psychological factors involved in generalized anxiety. In R. M. Rapee & D. H. Barlow (Eds.),Chronic anxiety: Generalized anxiety disorder and mixed anxiety-depression (pp. 76–94). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  18. Rapee, R. M., Barrett, P. M., Dadds, M. R., & Evans, L. (1994). Diagnostic reliability of the childhood anxiety disorders.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Vol. 33, 984–992.Google Scholar
  19. Silverman, W. K., & Nelles, W. B. (1988). The Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 27, 772–778.Google Scholar
  20. Sines, J. O. (1987). Influence of the home and family environment on childhood dysfunction. In B. B. Lahey & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.),Advances in clinical child psychology. (Vol. 10, pp. 1–54). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  21. Solyom, L., Silberfeld, M., & Solyom, C. (1976). Maternal overprotection in the etiology of agoraphobia.Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal, 21, 109–113.Google Scholar
  22. Suen, H. K., & Ary, D. (1987). Autocorrelation in applied behavior analysis: Myth or reality?Behavioral Assessment, 9, 125–130.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark R. Dadds
    • 1
  • Paula M. Barrett
    • 1
  • Ronald M. Rapee
    • 2
  • Sharon Ryan
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Applied PsychologyGriffith UniversityBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Macquarie UniversityNew South WalesAustralia
  3. 3.Catholic Education of QueenslandAustralia

Personalised recommendations