Genetica

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 323–363 | Cite as

Cytology of some of the members of Commelinaceae and its bearing on the interpretation of phylogeny

  • A. K. Sharma
Article
Received:
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1).
    Anderson, E. andK. Sax, 1936. A cytological monograph of the American species ofTradescantia. Bot. Gaz.,97: 433–476.Google Scholar
  2. 2).
    Babcock, E. B., 1936. The origin ofCrepis and related genera with particular reference to distribution and chromosome relationships. Essays in Geobotany in honour of William Albert Satchell, 9–13.Google Scholar
  3. 3).
    Babcock, E. B., Stebbins, G. L. andJ. A. Jenkins, 1937. Chromosomes and phylogeny in some genera of theCrepidineae. Cytologia, Fujii Jub. Vol., 188–210.Google Scholar
  4. 4).
    Belling, J., 1927. The attachment of chromosomes at the reductiondivision in flowering plants. J. Genet.,18: 177–205.Google Scholar
  5. 5).
    Bhaduri, P. N., 1942a. Cytological analysis of structural hybridity in Rhoeo discolor Hance. J. Genet.,44: 73–85.Google Scholar
  6. 6).
    Bhaduri, P. N., 1942b. Application of new technique to the cytogenetical reinvestigation of the genusTradescantia. J. Genet.,44: 87–127.Google Scholar
  7. 7).
    — andBose, P. C., 1947. Cytogenetical investigation in some common cucurbits with special reference to fragmentation of chromosomes as a physical basis of speciation. J. Genet.,48: 237–256.Google Scholar
  8. 8).
    Catcheside, D. G., 1937. Secondary pairing inBrassica oleraceae. Cytologia, Fujii Jub.Vol. 366–378.Google Scholar
  9. 9).
    Chakravorti, A. K., 1948. Theory of fragmentation of chromosomes and evolution of species. Sci. Cult.,13: 309–231.Google Scholar
  10. 10).
    Choudhuri, H. C., 1943a. Cytological studies in the genusSolanum. I, wild and native cultivated “diploid” potatoes. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin.,61: 113–135.Google Scholar
  11. 11).
    —, 1943b. Cytological studies in the genus Solanum. II, wild and native cultivated “diploid” potatoes.—Ibid: 199–219.Google Scholar
  12. 12).
    Clarke, C. B., 1947. Commelinaceae of Cyrtandraceae Bengalensis.Google Scholar
  13. 13).
    Darlington, C. D., 1928. Studies in Prunus. I, II. J. Genet.,19: 213–256.Google Scholar
  14. 14).
    —, 1929. Chromosome behaviour and structural hybridity in theTradescantieae. J. Genet.,21: 207–286.Google Scholar
  15. 15).
    Dutt, M., 1949. Cytogenetics of some ornamental Jasmines. Abstract. Proc. 36th Ind. Sci. Congr. 1949.Google Scholar
  16. 16).
    Farmer, J. B. andD. Shove, 1905. On the structure and development of the somatic and heterotypic chromosome ofTradescantia virginiana. Quart. Jour. Micros. Sci., 148.Google Scholar
  17. 17).
    Hance, R. T., 1915. Pollen development and degeneration in Zebrina pendula with special reference to the chromosomes. Bull. Torr. Bot. Club., 42.Google Scholar
  18. 18).
    Heilborn, O., 1936. The mechanism of so-called secondary association between chromosomes. Hereditas,22: 167–188.Google Scholar
  19. 19).
    Heilborn, O., 1937. Notes on chromosome associations. Cytologia, Fujii Jub.Vol. 9–13.Google Scholar
  20. 20).
    Heitz, E., 1932. Die Herkunft der Chromocentren. Planta,18: 571–635.Google Scholar
  21. 21).
    Iyendar, N. K., 1939. Cytological investigations on the genusCicer. Ann. Bot., N.S.,3: 271–305.Google Scholar
  22. 22).
    Kaufmann, B. P., 1948. Chromosome structure in relation to the chromosome cycle. Bot. Rev.,14: 57–126.Google Scholar
  23. 23).
    Lamm, R., 1945. Cytogenetic studies inSolanum, Sect.Tuberarium. Hereditas,31: 1–128.Google Scholar
  24. 24).
    Lawrence, W. J. C., 1929. The genetics and cytology ofDahlia species. Jour. Genet.,21: 125–159.Google Scholar
  25. 25).
    Ludford, R. J., 1942. Pathological aspects of cytology. Chapter in cytology and cell physiology. Oxford Univ. Press, London, 226–260.Google Scholar
  26. 26).
    Muntzing, A., 1933. Studies on meiosis in diploid and triploidSolanum tuberosum L.. Hereditas,17: 223–245.Google Scholar
  27. 27).
    Murthy, K. L., 1944. Curr. Sci.,3: 258.Google Scholar
  28. 28).
    Nandi, H. K., 1936. The chromosome morphology, secondary association and origin of cultivated rice. Jour. Genet.,33: 315–336.Google Scholar
  29. 29).
    Nawaschin, S., 1911. Uber eine Art der Chromatin Diminution beiTradescantia virginiana. Ber. Deuts. Bot. Ges.,29: 437–449.Google Scholar
  30. 30).
    Newcomer, E. H., 1933. A new cytological and histological fixing fluid. Science,118: 161.Google Scholar
  31. 31).
    Painter, T. S., 1943. Cell growth and nucleic acids in the pollen of Rhoeo discolor. Bot. Gaz.,105: 58–68.Google Scholar
  32. 32).
    Parthasarathy, N., 1939. Cytogenetical studies inOryzeae and Phalarideae, III. Ann. Bot., N.S.,3: 43–77.Google Scholar
  33. 33).
    Propach, H., 1937. Cytogenetische Untersuchungen in der GattungSolanum, Sect.Tuberarium. I. Die Sekundarpaarung. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abstamm. u. Vererb-Lehre,73: 143–154.Google Scholar
  34. 34).
    Raghavan, S., 1938. Cytology of Capparidaceae. Ann. Bot., N.S., 2.Google Scholar
  35. 35).
    Ramanujam, S., 1938. Chromosome studies in theOryzeae. Ann. Bot., N.S.,2: 107–125.Google Scholar
  36. 36).
    Sharma, A. K., 1947. A cytological investigation of incompatibility betweenCosmos bipinnatus Cav. Bull. Bot. Soc., Bengal,1: 19–26.Google Scholar
  37. 37).
    Sharma, A. K. andMiss Chitra Ghosh, 1951. Oxyquinoline-its possibilities in other Cytological procedures. Sci. Cult.,16: 528–529.Google Scholar
  38. 38).
    — andA. K. Bal, 1953. Coumarin in chromosome Analysis. Stain Tech.,28: 255–257.Google Scholar
  39. 39).
    Sharma, A. K. and MissChitra Ghosh, 1954. Further investigation on the cytology of the family Amaryllidaceae and its bearing on the interpretation of its phylogeny. Genetica Iberica (In Press).Google Scholar
  40. 40).
    — andN. K. Das, 1954. Study of Karyotypes and their alterations in Aroids. Agronomia lusitana 16: 23–48.Google Scholar
  41. 41).
    Sharma, A. K. and MissArchana Mookerjea, 1954. Paradichlorobenzene and other chemicals in chromosome work. Stain Tech. (In Press).Google Scholar
  42. 42).
    Sheffield, F. M. L., 1941. The cytoplasmic and nuclear inclusions associated with severe etch virus. Jour. Roy. Micros. Soc., Lond., Ser. III,61: 30–45.Google Scholar
  43. 43).
    Sikka, S. M., 1940. Cytogenetics ofBrassica hybrids and species. Jour. Genet.,60: 441–509.Google Scholar
  44. 44).
    Sparrow, A. H. andM. R. Hammond, 1947. Cytological evidence for the transfer of desoxyribonucleic acid from nucleus to cytoplasm in certain plant cells. Amer. Jour. Bot.,34: 439–445.Google Scholar
  45. 45).
    Srinath, K. V., 1940. Meiosis in diploid and aneuploid Calceolarias. Cytologia,10: 457–491.Google Scholar
  46. 46).
    Thomas, P. T. andS. H. Revell, 1946. Secondary association and heterochromatic attraction. I,Cicer arietinum. Ann. Bot., N.S.,10: 159–164.Google Scholar
  47. 47).
    Tischler, G., 1934. Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie, Bd II Allgemeine Pflanzenkaryologie, I. Hälfte: Der Ruhekern, Zweite Auflage. Berntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar
  48. 48).
    Upcott, M. B., 1936. The parents and progeny ofAesculus cornea. Jour. Genet.,33: 135–150.Google Scholar
  49. 49).
    Wilkinson, J., 1944. The cytology ofSalix in relation to its taxonomy. Ann. Bot., N.S.,8: 269–283.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff 1955

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. K. Sharma
    • 1
  1. 1.Cytogenetics Laboratory Dept. of Botany Calcutta UniversityCalcutta 19India

Personalised recommendations