Manometric follow-up of anal sphincter function after an ileo-anal pouch procedure

  • P. Luukkonen
Original Articles

Abstract

Between January 1985 and January 1987 restorative proctocolectomy with J-pouch was undertaken in 20 patients with ulcerative colitis. In all patients anal manometry was performed preoperatively, before closure of the temporary ileostomy (mean 3.9 months after operation) and 3, 6 and 12 months after the closure of the ileostomy. Preoperatively the basal resting pressure was 60.2±12 cm water and the maximum squeeze pressure 88.5 ±18 cm water. After the operation the respective pressures were 33.2 ±8 and 68 ±21 cm water, a decrease of 45% (p<0.05) and 12% (p<0.05), respectively. One year after the closure of the loop ileostomy the basal pressure was 46.2 ±9 cm water, which is still 23% lower (p<0.05) than preoperatively. At the same time the maximum squeeze pressure was 96.5 ± 13 cm water, 8% higher (p>0.1) than preoperatively. The continence of the patients at the end of the follow-up was either good (n=6) or excellent (n=9). A correlation seemed to exist between sphincter pressures and the degree of continence. It is concluded that the internal anal sphincter suffers damage during the operation and slowly recovers up to 6 months after closure of the covering ileostomy. After that its function usually does not improve and remains at a lower level than preoperatively.

Keywords

Public Health Internal Medicine Ulcerative Colitis Anal Sphincter Basal Pressure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Becker JM (1984) Anal sphincter function after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy and endorectal ileonal pull-through. Arch Surg 119:526–531Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nasmyth DG, Johnston D, Godwin PGR, Dixon MF, Smith A, Williams NS (1986) Factors influencing bowel function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 73:469–473Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Neal DE, Williams NS, Johnston D (1982) Rectal, bladder and sexual function after mucosal proctectomy with and without a pelvic reservoir for colitis and polyposis. Br J Surg 69:599–604Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beart RW, Dozois RR, Wolff BG, Pemberton JH (1985) Mechanisms of rectal continence. Lessons from the ileonal procedure. Am J Surg 149:31–34Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Becker JM, Raymond JL (1986) Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. A single surgeon's experience with 100 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 204:375–383Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stryker SJ, Kelly KA, Phillips SF, Dozois RR, Beart RW (1986) Anal and neorectal function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 203:55–61Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hancock BD, Smith K (1975) The internal sphincter and Lord's procedure for haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 62:833–836Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Utsunomiya J, Iwama T (1985) The J ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: the Japanese experience. In: Dozois RR (ed) Alternatives to conventional ileostomy. Yearbook Medical, Chicago 371–383Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Utsunomiya J, Oota M, Iwama T (1986) Recent trends in ileonal anastomosis. Ann Chir Gynaecol 75:56–62Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peck DA (1987) Rectal mucosal replacement with a stapled reservoir-anal anastomosis. 86th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Washington, DC (Abstract)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Taylor BM, Cranley B, Kelly KA, Phillips SF, Beart RW, Dozois RR (1983) A clinico-physiological comparison of ileal pouch-anal and straight ileoanal anastomoses. Ann Surg 198:462–468Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heppel J, Kelly KA, Phillips SF, Beart RW, Telander RL Jr, Perrault J (1982) Physiologic aspects of continence after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and endorectal ileoanal anastomosis. Ann Surg 195:435–443Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Luukkonen
    • 1
  1. 1.Second Department of SurgeryUniversity Central Hospital of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations