Journal für Ornithologie

, Volume 132, Issue 2, pp 145–163 | Cite as

Early stages of vocal ontogeny in the magpie (Pica pica)

  • Tomás Redondo
Article

Summary

The vocal repertoire of magpie (Pica pica) chicks consists of six calls: Begging Trill (BT), Soft Whistle (SW), Begging Scream (BS), Alarm Call (AC), Distress Call (DC) and Brief Contact Note (BCN). Both BT and SW have a tonal structure and their occurrence is restricted to the nestling period. At fledging, there is a gradual change from BT into BS and a sudden appearance of harsh calls similar to those of adult birds (AC, DC, BCN), without evident transitional forms with preceding tonal calls. Both the existence and the structural design of calls seem to be adapted for providing nestlings with immediate benefits linked to the two major chapters of allocation of parental care. Emission rates of BT increase with hunger motivation under laboratory conditions. Their structure suggests that they are easily located but liable to suffer from environmental degradation. BS of fledglings may be more resistant to degradation, a trait which may facilitate the identification by parents of their own offspring. Both AC and DC attract parents to defend the nest against potential predators, and their structure make them to be easily located and detectable at long distances. BCN are given by fledglings during bouts of locomotory activity (exploration and play) and they probably help in maintaining the cohesion of the group under conditions of poor visibility. In accordance, this call may be fairly located at short distances. The function of SW was unclear. It is given during periods of nestling inactivity between begging bouts, and could be easily elicited by tactile and auditory stimuli. After laboratory experiments, it is concluded that SW serve to indicate parents that nestlings are in good condition, hence to benefit from the parental willingness to invest in a brood with high prospects of survival. Since (i) there is a widespread lack of continuity in the development of adult vocalizations starting from nestling calls, and (ii) nestling calls seem to have evolved to provide birds with benefits in the short-term, these facts argue against the prevailing idea that the main function of calls early in ontogeny is to act as precursors of adult vocalizations.

Keywords

Alarm Call Transitional Form Sudden Appearance Distress Call Vocal Repertoire 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Zusammenfassung

Das Lautrepertoire von Elsternestlingen besteht aus 6 Lautäußerungen: Betteltrillern (BT), Sanftes Pfeifen (SP), Bettelkreischen (BK), Alarmruf (AR), Angstschreien (AS) und kurzer Kontaktruf (KR). BT und SP sind tonal und treten nur während der Nestlingsperiode auf. Zum Zeitpunkt des Ausfliegens geht BT graduell in BK über und plötzlich treten auch ohne vorausgehende tonale Übergangsformen rauhe Rufe ähnlich denen der Altvögel auf (AR, AS, KR). Sowohl die Existenz als auch die Struktur der Lautäußerungen scheinen als Anpassungen im Zusammenhang mit einer Optimierung der Brutpflege zu interpretieren zu sein. Die Emissionsrate von BT steigt unter Laborbedingungen mit der Hungermotivation. Die Struktur legt nahe, daß BT leicht geortet werden kann, aber auch leicht von der Umgebung verschluckt wird. BS der flüggen Jungen scheint davon weniger betroffen zu sein, so daß die Eltern leichter ihre Jungen identifizieren können. AR und AS veranlassen die Altvögel, ihr Nest gegenüber potentiellen Prädatoren zu verteidigen; die Struktur der Laute begünstigt ihre Ortung und Wahrnehmung über größere Entfernungen. KR werden von den flüggen Jungen bei lebhafter lokomotorischer Aktivität (Exploration, Spiel) geäußert; sie tragen vielleicht dazu bei, die Gruppe auch unter erschwerten optischen Kontaktmöglichkeiten zusammenzuhalten. Die Funktion von SP blieb unklar. SP war während inaktiver Perioden zwischen Bettelverhalten zu hören und konnte leicht durch taktile und akustische Reize ausgelöst werden. Nach Laborexperimenten ist zu schließen, daß SP den Eltern „Wohlbefinden” der Jungen anzeigt und so Bereitschaft zur Investition in eine Brut mit hoher Überlebenswahrscheinlichkeit fördert. Daß (1) zwischen den Rufen der Altvögel und dem Repertoire der Nestlingen weitgehend keine kontinuierlichen Übergänge festzustellen und (2) Nestlingsrufe offensichtlich im Hinblick auf kuzfristige Gewinne zu interpretieren sind, spricht gegen die allgemein vorherrschende Ansicht, das Lautrepertoire in frühen Stadien der Ontogenie sei hauptsächlich ein Vorläufer der Adultlaute.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Alberts, J. R., &C. P. Cramer (1988): Ecology and experience. Sources of means and meanings of developmental change. In:E. M. Blass, Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology 9: 1–39. N. Y.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, M., C. G. Wiklund, &H. Rundgren (1980): Parental defence of offspring: a model and an example. Anim. Behav. 28: 536–542.Google Scholar
  3. Andrew, R. J. (1966): Precocious adult behaviour in the young chick. Anim. Behav. 14: 485–500.Google Scholar
  4. Balph, M. H. (1975): Development of young Brewer's blackbirds. Wilson Bull. 87: 207–230.Google Scholar
  5. Beecher, M. D., I. M. Beecher, &S. Hahn (1981): Parent-offspring recognition in bank swallows (Riparia riparia): II. Development and acoustic basis. Anim. Behav. 29: 95–101.Google Scholar
  6. Bekoff, M. (1985): Evolutionary perspectives of behavioral development. Z. Tierpsychol. 69: 166–167.Google Scholar
  7. Bischof, H. J., &R. Lassek (1985): The gaping reaction and the development of fear in young zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata castanotis). Z. Tierpsychol. 69: 55–65.Google Scholar
  8. Bremond, J. C., &T. Aubin (1990): Responses to distress calls by black-headed gulls,Larus ridibundus: the role of non-degraded features. Anim. Behav. 39: 503–511.Google Scholar
  9. Buitron, D. (1988): Female and male specialization in parental care and its consequences in black-billed magpies. Condor 90: 29–39.Google Scholar
  10. Chiszar, D. (1985): Ontogeny of communicative behaviors. In:E. S. Gollin, The Comparative Development of Adaptive Skills: Evolutionary Implications: 207–238. Hillsdale.Google Scholar
  11. Cosens, S. E. (1981): Development of vocalizations in the American Coot. Can. J. Zool. 59: 1921–1928.Google Scholar
  12. Ditto &J. B. Falls (1984): A comparison of sound propagation and song frequency in temperate marsh and grassland habitats. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 15: 161–170.Google Scholar
  13. Elsacker, L. van, R. Pinxten, &R. Verheyen (1986): Parent-offspring recognition in starlings (Sturnus v. vulgaris). In:L. Passera, &J. P. Lachaud, The Individual and Society: 73–78. Toulouse.Google Scholar
  14. Earle, R. A. (1986): Vocalizations of the South African Cliff SwallowHirundo spilodera. S. Afr. J. Zool. 21: 229–232.Google Scholar
  15. Gebauer, A. (1984): Die Lautentwicklung beim Buntspecht,Dendrocopos major. Ann. Orn. 8: 107–127.Google Scholar
  16. Gomendio, M. (1988): The development of different types of play in gazelles: implications for the nature and functions of play. Anim. Behav. 36: 825–836.Google Scholar
  17. Groothuis, T. (1989): On the ontogeny of display behaviour in the black-headed gull: I. The gradual emergence of the adult forms. Behaviour 109: 76–124.Google Scholar
  18. Harper, A. B. (1986): The evolution of begging: sibling competition and parent-offspring conflict. Am. Nat. 128: 99–114.Google Scholar
  19. Horwich, R. H. (1969): Behavioral ontogeny of the mockingbird. Wilson Bull. 91: 434–440.Google Scholar
  20. Howes-Jones, D. (1984): The vocal behaviour of young warbling vireos. Can. J. Zool. 62: 205–230.Google Scholar
  21. Klump, G. M., &M. D. Shalter (1984): Acoustic behaviour of birds and mammals in the predator context: I. Factors governing the structure of alarm signals. II. The functional significance and evolution of alarm calls. Z. Tierpsychol. 66: 189–226.Google Scholar
  22. Lanyon, W. E. (1960): The ontogeny of vocalizations in birds. In:W. E. Lanyon, &N. N. Tavolga, Animal Sounds and Communication: 321–347. Publ. No. 7. Am. Inst. Biol. Sci. Washington.Google Scholar
  23. Ditto (1979): Development of song in the wood thrush (Hylocichla mustelina), with notes on a technique for hand-rearing passerines from the egg. Am. Mus. Novit. 2666: 1–27.Google Scholar
  24. Le Magnen, J. (1983): Body energy balance and food intake: a neuroendocrine regulatory mechanism. Physiol. Rev. 63: 314–386.Google Scholar
  25. Linsdale, J. M. (1937): The natural history of magpies. Pac. Coast Avif. 25: 1–234.Google Scholar
  26. McLaren, M. A. 1976. Vocalizations of the boreal chickadee. Auk 93: 451–463.Google Scholar
  27. Marler, P. (1956): The voice of the chaffinch and its function as a language. Ibis 98: 231–261.Google Scholar
  28. Ditto &P. C. Mundinger (1975): Vocalizations, social organization and breeding biology of the twite (Acanthis flavirostris). Ibis 117: 1–17.Google Scholar
  29. Ditto &S. Peters (1982): Subsong and plastic song: their role in the vocal learning process. In:D. E. Kroodsma, &E.H. Miller, Acoustic communication in birds Vol 2, 25–50. N. Y.Google Scholar
  30. Marten, K., &P. Marler (1977): Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalizations. I. Temperate habitats. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2: 271–290.Google Scholar
  31. Meinert, U., &H.-H. Bergmann (1983): Zur Jugendentwicklung der Lautäußerungen beim Birkhuhn (Tetrao tetrix). Behaviour 85: 242–259.Google Scholar
  32. Messmer, F., &E. Messmer (1956): Die Entwicklung der Lautäußerungen und einiger Verhaltensweisen der Amsel (Turdus merula merula L.) unter natürlichen Bedingungen und nach Einzelaufzucht in schalldichten Räumen. Z. Tierpsychol. 13: 341–441.Google Scholar
  33. Milinski, M. (1978): Kin selection and reproductive value. Z. Tierpsychol. 47: 328–329.Google Scholar
  34. Morehouse, E. L., &R. Brewer, (1968): Feeding of nestling and fledgling eastern kingbirds. Auk 85: 44–54.Google Scholar
  35. Moynihan, M. (1962): Hostile and sexual behavior patterns of South American and Pacific Laridae. Behaviour Suppl. 8: 1–365.Google Scholar
  36. O'Connor, R. J. (1984): The growth and development of birds. Chichester.Google Scholar
  37. Oppenheim, R. W. (1980): Metamorphosis and adaptation in the behaviour of developing organisms. Devl. Psychobiol. 13: 353–356.Google Scholar
  38. Redondo, T. (1989): Avian nest defence: theoretical models and evidence. Behaviour 111: 161–195.Google Scholar
  39. Ditto &L. Arias de Reyna (1988): Locatability of begging calls in nestling altricial birds. Anim. Behav. 36: 653–661.Google Scholar
  40. Ditto &J. Carranza (1989): Offspring reproductive value and nest defense in the magpie. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25: 369–378.Google Scholar
  41. Ditto &F. Exposito (1990): Structural variations in the begging calls of nestling magpies (Pica pica) and their role in the development of adult voice. Ethology 84: 307–318.Google Scholar
  42. Richards, D. G., &R. H. Wiley (1980): Reverberations and amplitude fluctuations in the propagation of sound in a forest: implications for animal communication. Am. Nat. 115: 381–399.Google Scholar
  43. Ricklefs, R. E. (1969): An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. Smithson. Contr. Zool. 9: 1–48.Google Scholar
  44. Ditto (1983): Avian postnatal development. In:D. S. Farner, J. R. King, &K.C. Parkes, Avian Biology 7: 1–83. N. Y.Google Scholar
  45. Roberts, J., Moreno, A., Kacelnik, A., &M. Hunter (1983): Physical considerations in the frequency limits of birdsong. Acoustic Letters 6: 100–105.Google Scholar
  46. Rooke, I. J., &T. A. Knight, (1977): Alarm calls of honeyeaters with reference to locating sources of sound. Emu 77: 193–198.Google Scholar
  47. Russell, P., &J. H. Balda, (1978): The care of young piñon jays and their integration into the flock. J. Orn. 119: 146–171.Google Scholar
  48. Ryden, O. O. (1978): Differential responsiveness of great tit nestlings,Parus major, to natural auditory stimuli. Z. Tierpsychol. 47: 236–253.Google Scholar
  49. Schleidt, W. M., &M. D. Shalter (1973): Stereotypy of a fixed action pattern during ontogeny inCoturnix coturnix coturnix. Z. Tierpsychol. 33: 35–37.Google Scholar
  50. Smith, S. M. (1977): The behavior and vocalizations of young turquoise-browed motmots. Biotropica 9: 127–130.Google Scholar
  51. Ditto (1983): The ontogeny of avian behaviour. In:D. S. Farner, King, J. R., &K. C. Parkes, Avian Biology 7: 85–160. N. Y.Google Scholar
  52. Thompson, W. L. (1976): Vocalizations of the lazuli bunting. Condor 78: 195–207.Google Scholar
  53. Ditto &J. O'H. Rice (1970): Calls of the indigo bunting,Passerina cyanea. Z. Tierpsychol. 27: 35–46.Google Scholar
  54. Thoren, B. ten, &H.-H. Bergmann (1987 a): Veränderung und Konstanz von Merkmalen in der jugendlichen Stimmentwicklung der Nonnengans (Branta leucopsis). Behaviour 100: 61–91.Google Scholar
  55. Ditto (1987 b): Die Entwicklung der Lautäußerungen bei der Graugans (Anser anser). J. Orn. 128: 181–207.Google Scholar
  56. Wilkinson, R. (1980): Calls of nestling chaffinchesFringilla coelebs: the use of two sound sources. Z. Tierpsychol. 54: 346–356.Google Scholar
  57. Ditto &C. R. Huxley (1978): Vocalizations of chicks and juveniles and the development of calls in the Aldabra white-throated railDryolimnas cuvieri aldabranus (Aves: Rallidae). J. Zool. Lond. 186: 487–505.Google Scholar
  58. Winkler, H., &L. L. Short (1978): A comparative analysis of acoustical signals in pied woodpeckers (Aves,Picoides). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 160: 1–110.Google Scholar
  59. Zann, R. (1975): Inter- and intraspecific variation in the calls of three species of grassfinches of the subgenusPoephila (Gould) (Estrildidae). Z. Tierpsychol. 39: 85–125.Google Scholar
  60. Zar, J. H. (1984): Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Verlag der Deutschen Ornithologen-Gesellschaft 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomás Redondo
    • 1
  1. 1.Estación Biológica de Doñana, C.S.I.C.SevillaSpain

Personalised recommendations