Advertisement

Communications in Mathematical Physics

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 237–256 | Cite as

Space-times containing perfect fluids and having a vanishing conformal divergence

  • L. C. Shepley
  • A. H. Taub
Article

Abstract

The solutions of the Einstein field equations are studied under the assumptions that (1) the source of the gravitational field is a perfect fluid, (2) the divergence of the conformal (Weyl) tensor vanishes, and (3a) either an equation of state exists such thatp=p (w),p being the pressure andw the rest energy density, or (3b) the rest particle density is conserved. Under assumptions (1), (2), and (3a) it is shown that the space-time is conformally flat and the metric is a Robertson-Walker metric. The flow is irrotational, shear-free, and geodesic. Under assumptions (1), (2), and (3b) it is shown that either the line element is static or the fluid has a very special caloric equation of state. Conditions for a static solution to exist are examined, and it is shown that the Schwarzschild interior solution satisfies these conditions as does the Einstein universe. The Schwarzschild interior and the Einstein universe are the only conformally flat, static solutions obeying (1), (2), and (3b).

Keywords

Neural Network Energy Density Nonlinear Dynamics Static Solution Field Equation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hawking, S. W.: Astrophys. J.145, 544 (1966).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Walker, A. G.: Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser.6, 81 (1935).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Taub, A. H.: Arch. Ratl. Mech. Anal.3, 312 (1959). Also “Relativistic hydrodynamics”, notes.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ehlers, J.: Akad. Wiss. Mainz Abh. Math.-Naturwiss. (1961) No. 11.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eisenhart, L. P.: Riemannian geometry. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press 1964.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Taub, A. H.: In: Perspectives in geometry and relativity (ed. byB. Hoffman). Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press 1966.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kundt, W., andM. Trümper: Akad. Wiss. Mainz Abhdl. Math.-Naturwiss. (1962) No. 12.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Szekeres, P.: J. Math. Phys.7, 751 (1966).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Robertson, H. P.: Rev. Mod. Phys.5, 62 (1933).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Raychaudhuri, A.: Phys. Rev.98, 1123 (1955);106, 172 (1957).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McVittie, G. C.: General relativity and cosmology. London: Chapman and Hall 1956.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schouten, J. A.: Ricci-Calculus. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer 1954.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tolman, R. C.: Relativity thermodynamics and cosmology. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1962.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pirani, F. A. E.: In: Gravitation, an introduction to current research (ed. byL. Witten). New York: Wiley 1962.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Szekeres, P.: Proc. Roy. Soc. London A274, 206 (1963).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Plebański, J.: Private communication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1967

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. C. Shepley
    • 1
  • A. H. Taub
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaBerkeley

Personalised recommendations