Advertisement

Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 15–31 | Cite as

Misleading appearances in pediatric uroradiology

  • R. L. Lebowitz
  • F. E. Avni
Originals

Abstract

Certain misleading appearances are peculiar to pediatric uroradiology. The most frequently encountered pitfalls are related to the bladder, to vesicoureteral reflux, and to the duplicated collecting system. The bi-chambered nature of the child's bladder, and the rapid settling of contrast material to the most dependent portion causes many pitfalls in diagnosis. When the child is prone, normal ureters may seem to be ectopic, and ureteroceles may become invisible. When the child is supine, the volume of urine in the bladder may be grossly under-estimated. Reflux can mimic function at urography. The dynamic nature of reflux leads to under-estimation of its presence and degree on the IVP and static cystogram. Reflux into an already dilated system can lead to over-estimation of its degree. Aberrant micturition with rapid refilling of the bladder can simulate incomplete emptying. The diagnosis of “ectopic ureterocele” is based on indirect evidence. Any condition that affects the urinary apparatus in the same way will have a similar appearance. A huge ureterocele may have a small ureter, and massive reflux into a lower pole ureter may make the diagnosis of duplication difficult. Ureterocele “lookalikes”, and effacement or intussusception of the ureterocele are cystographic pitfalls. Lower pole ureteropelvic junction obstruction and Wilms tumor in the lower portion of a kidney can have surprisingly similar appearances.

Key words

Pediatric uroradiology Misleading appearances Bladder Vesicoureteral reflux Aberrant micturition Duplex collecting system Ectopic ureterocele 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beale G (1975) Intravaginal and intrauterine refluxing of urine in children. Austral Radiol 2:194Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bauer SB, Retik AB (1978) The non-obstructive ectopic ureterocele. J Urol 119:804PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berdon WE, Baker DH, Leonidas J (1968) Advantages of prone positioning in gastrointestinal and genitourinary roentgenology studies in infants and children. AJR 103:444Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berdon WB, Baker DH (1974) The significance of a distended bladder in the interpretation of intravenous pyelogram obtained on patients with “hydronephrosis”. AJR 120:402Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Colodny AH, Lebowitz RL (1974) Importance of voiding during cystourethrogram. J Urol 111:838PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Colodny AH, Lebowitz, RL (1974) A plea for grading vesicoureteric reflux. Urology 4:357PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Conway JJ, Belman AB, King LR, et al (1975) Direct and indirect radionuclide cystography. J Urol 113:685Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cremin BJ, Funston MR, Aaronson IA (1977) The intraureteric diverticulum, a manifestation of ureterocele intussusception. Pediatr Radiol 6:92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Edwards D, Normand ICS, Prescod N, Smellie JN (1977) Disappearance of vesico-ureteral reflux during long-term prophylaxis of urinary tract infection in children. Br Med J I:285Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Friedland GW, Cunningham J (1972) The elusive ectopic ureteroceles. AJR 116:792Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gill WB, Curtis EA (1977) The influence of bladder fullness on upper urinary tract dimensions and renal excretory function. J Urol 117:573PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hartman GW, Hodson CJ (1969) The duplex kidney and related abnormalities. Clin Radiol 20:387PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hutch JA (1966) Aberrant micturition. J Urol 96:743PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kelalis PP (1971) Proper perspective on vesico-ureteral reflux. Mayo Clin Proc 46:807PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kelalis PP, Burke EC, Stickler GB, Hartman GW (1973) Urinary vaginal reflux in children. Pediatrics 51:941PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lebowitz RL (1978) Voiding cystourethrography in children. Contemp Diagn Radiol 5:1Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Redman JF, Scriber LJ, McGinnis TB, Bissada NK (1975) Unsuspected duplex ureters. Urology 2:196Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Snyder HM, Lebowitz RL, Colodny AH, Bauer SB, Retik AB (in press) Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. Urol Clin North AmGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weiss RM, Spackman TJ (1974) Everting ectopic ureterocele. J Urol 111:538PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Willi UV, Lebowitz RL (1979) The so-called megacystismegaureter syndrome. AJR 133:409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zinner N, Datta NS, Fay R (1977) Cystometrics during endoscopy of a ureterocele. J Urol 117:562PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. L. Lebowitz
    • 1
    • 2
  • F. E. Avni
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyChildren's Hospital Medical CenterBostonUSA
  2. 2.Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations