Infection

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 57–60 | Cite as

Staphylococcus aureus in patients with cystic fibrosis: An epidemiological analysis using a combination of traditional and molecular methods

  • R. V. Goering
  • A. Bauernfeind
  • Barbara Przyklenk
  • W. Lenz
Addendum III Staphylococcal Aspects Of Cystic Fibrosis

Summary

An epidemiological analysis ofStaphylococcus aureus was conducted in a study group of 157 cystic fibrosis patients cultured over a 30-month period. The resultingS. aureus isolates were categorized by bacteriophage type, plasmid profile, and (in some instances) chromosomal restriction fragment pattern of the culture-positive patients withS. aureus (34 of 157) 44% only were sporadically infected while 68% shared identical strains with one or more other patients. Six patients exhibited persistent infection (for up to ten months) which, in three individuals, occurred as cycles of carriage and reappearance. By contributing toward our understanding of the persistence and spread ofS. aureus in cystic fibrosis patients these data should aid in clarifying the role this organism may play in the course of the disease.

Keywords

Cystic Fibrosis Staphylococcus Aureus Staphylococcus Molecular Method Cystic Fibrosis Patient 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Epidemiologische Analyse des Auftretens von Staphylococcus aureus bei Mukoviszidosepatienten mit Hilfe konventioneller und molekularer Methoden

Zusammenfassung

Das Auftreten vonStaphylococcus aureus wurde bei 157 Mukoviszidosepatienten über 30 Monate hin analysiert. Dazu wurden dieS. aureus-Isolate nach Lysotyp, Plasmidmuster sowie in einigen Fällen dem Restriktionsmuster ihrer chromosomalen DNS klassifiziert. Danach konnte in 44% aller Patienten, in deren SputaS. aureus nachweisbar war, bei aufeinanderfolgenden Episoden ein Wechsel desS. aureus-Typs beobachtet werden. IdentischeS. aureus-Typen wurden bei 68% der Patienten gefunden, wobei derselbe Typ in bis zu fünf verschiedenen Patienten auftrat. Bei sechs Patienten persistierte derselbeS. aureus-Stamm (bis zu zehn Monate), bei drei unter ihnen war er zwischendurch nicht mehr nachweisbar. Die Ergebnisse weisen auf die Möglichkeit der Ausbreitung vonS. aureus-Stämmen unter Mukoviszidosepatienten hin.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bauernfeind, A., Bertele, R. M., Harms, K., Hörl, G., Jungwirth, R., Petermüller, C., Przyklenk, B., Weisslein-Pfister, C. Qualitative and quantitative microbiological analysis of sputa of 102 patients with cystic fibrosis. Infection 15 (1987) 270–277.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bauernfeind, A., Hörl, G., Przyklenk, B. Microbiologic and therapeutic aspects ofStaphylococcus aureus in cystic fibrosis patients. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 23 Suppl. 143 (1988) 99–102.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goering, R. V., Duensing, T. D. Rapid field-inversion gel electrophoresis in combination with a rRNA gene probe in the epidemiological evaluation of staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28 (1990) 426–429.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Høiby, N. Microbiology of lung infections in cystic fibrosis patients. Acta Paediatr. Scand. Suppl. 301 (1982) 33–54.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chartrand, S. A., Marks, M. I. Pulmonary infections in cystic fibrosis: pathogenesis and therapy. In:Pennington, J. E. (ed.): Respiratory Infections: Diagnosis and Management. Raven Press, New York 1988, pp. 276–297.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Geddes, D. M. Antimicrobial therapy againstStaphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, andPseudomonas cepacia. Chest 94 (Suppl. 2) (1988) 97S-103S.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Michel, B. C. Antibacterial therapy in cystic fibrosis. A review of the literature published between 1980 and February 1987. Chest 94 (Suppl. 2) (1988) 129S-140S.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carle, G. F., Frank, M., Olsen, M. V. Electrophoretic separation of large DNA molecules by periodic inversion of the electric field. Science 232 (1986) 65–68.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith, P. B. Bacteriophage typing ofStaphylococcus aureus. In:Cohen, J. O. (ed.): The Staphylococci, Wiley-Interscience, New York 1972, pp. 431–441.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holmes, D. S., Quigley, M. A rapid boiling method for the preparation of bacterial plasmids. Anal. Biochem. 114 (1981) 193–197.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goering, R. V., Ruff, E. A. Comparative analysis of conjugative plasmids mediating gentamicin resistance inStaphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 24 (1983) 450–452.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meyers, J. A., Sanchez, D., Elwell, L. P., Falkow, S. Simple agarose gel electrophoresis method for the identification and characterization of plasmid deoxyribonucleic acid. J. Bacteriol. 127 (1976) 1529–1537.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huang, N. N., Schidlow, D. V., Szatrowski, T. H., Palmer, J., Laraya-Cuasay, L. R., Yueng, W. et al.: Clinical feature, survival rate, and prognostic factors in young adults with cystic fibrosis. Am. J. Med. 82 (1987) 871–879.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Albus, A., Fournier, J.-M., Wolz, C., Boutonnier, A., Ranke, M., Høiby, N. et al.:Staphylococcus aureus capsular types and antibody response to lung infection in patients with cystic fibrosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 26 (1988) 2505–2509.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MMV Medizin Verlag GmbH München 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. V. Goering
    • 1
  • A. Bauernfeind
    • 2
  • Barbara Przyklenk
    • 2
  • W. Lenz
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Medical MicrobiologyCreighton University School of MedicineOmahaUSA
  2. 2.Max von Pettenkofer-Institut für Hygiene und Medizinische Microbiologie der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenMünchen 2
  3. 3.Institut für Mikrobiologie und Immunologie der UniversitätBonnFR Germany

Personalised recommendations