Advertisement

Infection

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 270–277 | Cite as

Qualitative and quantitative microbiological analysis of sputa of 102 patients with cystic fibrosis

  • A. Bauernfeind
  • G. Hörl
  • R. Jungwirth
  • C. Petermüller
  • B. Przyklenk
  • C. Weisslein-Pfister
  • R. M. Bertele
  • K. Harms
Cystic Fibrosis Part I

Summary

A microbiological analysis of 102 patients suffering from cystic fibrosis was conducted over a 22 month period. 20 microbial species with the following incidence were identified:Pseudomonas aeruginosa: 83.4%;Candida albicans: 29.4%;Staphylococcus aureus: 24.5%;Staphylococcus epidermidis: 11.8%;Haemophilus influenzae: 11.8%;Streptococcus pneumoniae: 6.9%;Pseudomonas maltophilia: 6.8%;Aspergillus fumigatus: 5.9%. Other species were present in less than 5% of the patients. In the majority of specimens withP. aeruginosa, more than one type (up to six) was detectable. These strains were identical in colony appearance, O-serotype and pyocin-type. Quantitative analysis revealed concentrations of colony-forming units of 107 to 109 forP. aeruginosa, 106 to 108 forP. maltophilia, 104 to 107 forS. aureus, 104 to 106 forS. epidermidis and 104 to 107 forC. albicans in the majority of specimens. Significant differences were observed in the time periods during which the pathogens persisted in the patients. Maximum persistence was observed forP. aeruginosa. P. maltophilia andA. fumigatus had about similar persistence rates, which were lower than those forP. aeruginosa but above those forS. aureus andH. influenzae. S. epidermidis was eliminated within shorter periods thanS. aureus. C. albicans, although the second most frequent microorganism identified, showed a very low persistence rate. The microbiological analysis confirms results from other research centers (high incidence ofP. aeruginosa), but reveals significant regional differences as well (Pseudomonas cepacia not detectable, higher incidence ofP. maltophilia andC. albicans). This underlines the necessity for detailed qualitative and quantitative microbiological analysis of sputa from cystic fibrosis patients as a prerequisite for rational analysis of etiological, epidemiological and therapeutical aspects of cystic fibrosis.

Keywords

Cystic Fibrosis Candida Albicans Streptococcus Pneumoniae Cystic Fibrosis Patient Haemophilus Influenzae 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Quantitative und qualitative Analyse von Sputa von 102 Patienten mit zystischer Fibrose

Zusammenfassung

In Sputumproben von 102 Mukoviszidosepatienten konnten innerhalb von 22 Monaten insgesamt 20 verschiedene Mikroorganismenarten nachgewiesen werden. Ihr Auftreten verteilt sich wie folgt (in % der Patienten):Pseudomonas aeruginosa 83,4%,Candida albicans 29,4%,Staphylococcus aureus 24,5%,Staphylococcus epidermidis 11.8%,Haemophilus influenzae 11,8%,Streptococcus pneumoniae 6,9%,Pseudomonas maltophilia 6,8%,Aspergillus fumigatus 5,9%. Alle übrigen Spezies kamen in weniger als 5% der Patienten vor.Ps. aeruginosa trat überwiegend in mehreren Typen pro Patient auf (bis zu 6). Quantitative Unterschiede zwischen den Spezies wurden erkennbar: pro Gramm Sputum lagen die Koloniebildnerzahlen zwischen folgenden Grenzwerten:Ps. aeruginosa 107–109,Ps. maltophilia 106–108,S. aureus 104–107,S. epidermidis 104–106,Candida albicans 104–107. Der kontinuierliche Nachweis für einzelne Spezies und Typen im individuellen Patienten nahm in folgender Reihenfolge ab:Ps. aeruginosa, Ps. maltophilia, Aspergillus fumigatus, S. aureus, H. influenzae, S. epidermidis, Candida albicans. Diese Resultate deuten auf bemerkenswerte Unterschiede in der mikrobiologischen Konstellation verschiedener Zentren und Regionen bei Mukoviszidosepatienten hin und unterstreichen die Notwendigkeit für die Erhebung lokaler und individueller Daten als Grundlage für die Analytik von Ätiologie und Epidemiologie sowie rationale Chemotherapie bei Mukoviszidose.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. 1.
    Di Sant'Agnese, P. A., Andersen, D. H. Celiac syndrome. IV. Chemotherapy in infections of the respiratory tract associated with cystic fibrosis of the pancreas; observations with penicillin and drugs of the sulfonamide group with special reference to penicillin aerosol. Am. J. Dis. Child. 72 (1946) 17–61.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Høiby, N. Microbiology of lung infections of cystic fibrosis patients. Acta Paediatr. Scand. Suppl. 301 (1982) 33–54.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bauernfeind, A., Harms, K., Bertele, R. M., Petermüller, C., Przyklenk, B. Importance of Bacteriological Data for Antibiotic Therapy in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis. In:Simon, C., Wilkinson, P. (ed.): Diagnosis of infectious diseases — new aspects. Schattauer, Stuttgart, New York 1986, pp. 149–155.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thomassen, M. J., Demko, C. A., Boxerbaum, B., Stern, R. C., Kuchenbrod, P. J. Multiple isolates ofPseudomonas aeruginosa with differing antimicrobial susceptibility patterns from patients with cystic fibrosis. J. Infect. Dis. 140 (1979) 873–880.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hammerschlag, M. R., Harding, L., Macone, A., Smith, A. L., Goldmann, D. A. Bacteriology of Sputum in Cystic Fibrosis: Evaluation of Dithiothreitol as a Mucolytic Agent. J. Clin. Microbiol. 11 (1980) 552–557.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wong, K., Roberts, M. C., Owens, L., Fife, M., Smith, A. L. Selective media for the quantitation of bacteria in cystic fibrosis sputum. Med. Microbiol. 7 (1984) 113–119.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bauernfeind, A., Rotter, K., Pfister-Weisslein, Ch. Selective procedure to isolateHaemophilus influenzae from sputa with large quantities ofPseudomonas aeruginosa. Infection 15 (1987) 278–280.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lennette, E. H., Balows, A., Hausler, W. J., Truant, J. Manual of Clinical Microbiology, Third Edition. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C. (1980).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ewing, W. (ed.): Identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Fourth Edition. Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., New York 1986.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schleifer, K. H., Kloos, W. E. A simple test system for the separation of staphylococci from micrococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1 (1975) 337–338.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seeliger, H. P. R., Heymer, T. (ed.): Diagnostik pathogener Pilze des Menschen und seiner Umwelt. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, New York 1981.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fyfe, J. A. M., Harris, G., Govan, J. R. W. Revised Pyocin Typing Method forPseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Clin. Microbiol. 20 (1984) 47–50.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huang, N. N., Doggett, R. G. Antibiotic Therapy of Pseudomonas Infection in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis. In:Doggett, R. G. (ed.):Pseudomonas aeruginosa — clinical manifestations of infection and current therapy. Academic Press, New York 1979, pp. 410–445.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baltimore, R. S., Radnay-Baltimore, K., von Graevenitz, A., Bolan, T. F. Occurrence of nonfermentative gram-negative rods other thanPseudomonas aeruginosa in the respiratory tract of children with cystic fibrosis. Helv. Paediatr. Acta 37 (1982) 547–554.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gilligan, P. H., Schidlow, D. V. Role ofPseudomonas cepacia in pulmonary disease of cystic fibrosis patients. Clin. Microbiol. Newsl. 6 (1984) 42–44.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Isles, A., Maclusky, I., Corey, M., Gold, R., Prober, C., Fleming, P., Levison, H. Pseudomonas cepacia infection in cystic fibrosis: an emerging problem. J. Pediatr. 104 (1984) 206–210.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thomassen, M. J., Klinger, J. D., Badger, S. J., von Heeckesen, D. W., Stern, R. C. Culture of thoracotomy specimens confirm usefulness of sputum cultures in cystic fibrosis. J. Pediatr. 103 (1984) 352–356.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Govan, J. R. W., Harris, G. S. Technique for bacteriocin typing ofPseudomonas cepacia. In:Lawson, D. (ed.): Cystic fibrosis: Horizons. Wiley, New York 1985.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Corey, M., Allison, L., Prober, C., Levison, H. Sputum Bacteriology in patients with cystic fibrosis in a Toronto hospital during 1970–1981. J. Infect. Dis. 149 (1984) 283.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schonheyder, H., Jensen, J., Høiby, N., Andersen, P., Koch, C. Frequency ofAspergillus fumigatus isolates and antibodies to Aspergillus antigens in cystic fibrosis. Acta path. microbiol. immunol. scand. Sect. B 93 (1985) 105–112.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nelson, L. A., Callerame, M. L., Schwartz, R. H. Aspergillosis and atopy in cystic fibrosis. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 120 (1979) 863–873.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Laufer, P., Fink, J. N., Bruns, W. T., Unger, G. F., Kalbfleisch, J. H., Greenberger, P. A., Patterson, R. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in cystic fibrosis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 73 (1984) 44–48.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bardana, E. J., Kasturi, L. S., Cianciulli, F. D., Noonan, M. J. Aspergillus antibody in patients with cystic fibrosis. Am. J. Dis. Child. 129 (1975) 1164–1167.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brueton, M. J., Ormerod, L. P., Shah, K. J., Anderson, D. M. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis complicating cystic fibrosis in childhood. Arch. Dis. Child. 55 (1980) 348–353.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Staib, F., Abel, T., Mishra, S. K., Müller, J. A. Aspergillus fumigatus-Infektion der Lunge bei Mucoviscidose. Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 105 (1980) 442–445.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Iacocca, V. F., Sibinga, M. S., Barbero, G. J. Respiratory tract bacteriology in cystic fibrosis. Am. J. Dis. Child. 106 (1963) 315–324.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Govan, J. B. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and respiratory infection in cystic fibrosis. Cystic Fibrosis News. Focus on Research: Number 48 (1983) 5–9.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Høiby, N., Schiotz, P. O. (ed.): Pulmonary Infections in Cystic Fibrosis. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica 301, 1982.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Govan, J. R. W., Doherty, C., Glass, S. Rational Parameters for Antibiotic Therapy in patients with Cystic Fibrosis. Infection 15 (1987) 300–307.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ramphal, R., Vishwanath, S. Why is Pseudomonas the colonizer and why does it persist? Infection 15 (1987) 281–294.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MMV Medizin Verlag GmbH München 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Bauernfeind
    • 1
  • G. Hörl
    • 1
  • R. Jungwirth
    • 1
  • C. Petermüller
    • 1
  • B. Przyklenk
    • 1
  • C. Weisslein-Pfister
    • 1
  • R. M. Bertele
    • 2
  • K. Harms
    • 2
  1. 1.Max-von-Pettenkofer-InstitutMunich
  2. 2.Dr. von Hauner'sches Kinderspital der UniversitätMunich

Personalised recommendations