Journal of Clinical Monitoring

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 175–182 | Cite as

Terminology and the current limitations of time capnography: A brief review

  • K. Bhavani-Shankar
  • A. Y. Kumar
  • H. S. L. Moseley
  • R. Ahyee-Hallsworth
Original Articles

Abstract

The carbon dioxide (CO2) trace versus time (time capnography) is convenient and adequate for clinical use. This is the method most commonly utilized in capnography. However, the current terminology in time capnography has not yet been standardized and is, therefore, a potential source of confusion. Standard terminology that is based on convention and logic to represent the various phases of a time capnogram is essential. The time capnogram should be considered as two segments: an inspiratory segment and an expiratory segment. The inspiratory segment is termed as phase 0; the expiratory segment is divided into phases I, II, III, and, occasionally, IV, Phase I represents the CO2-free gas from the airways (anatomical dead space); phase II consists of a rapid S-shaped upswing on the tracing due to mixing of dead space gas with alveolar gas; and phase III, the alveolar plateau, represents CO2-rich gas from the alveoli. The physiologic basis of phase IV, the terminal upswing at the end of phase III, which is observed in capnograms recorded under certain circumstances (such as in pregnant subjects and obese subjects) is discussed in detail. The clinical implications of the alpha angle, which is the angle between phases II and III, and the beta angle, which is the angle between phases III and the descending limb of phase 0, are outlined. The subtle but important limitations of time capnography are reviewed; its current status as well as its future potential are explored.

Key words

Measurement technique: capnography Monitoring: carbon dioxide 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Smalhout B, Kalenda Z. An atlas of capnography, ed 2. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Kerckebosch-Zeist, 1981Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bhavani-Shankar K, Moseley H, Kumar AY, Delph Y. Anaesthesia and capnometry (Review article). Can J Anaesth 1992;39:617–632PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fletcher R. The single breath test for carbon dioxide (Thesis). Lund, Sweden, 1980Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moon RE, Camporesi EM. Respiratory monitoring. In: Miller RD, ed. Anesthesia, ed 3. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1990:1129–1163Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fletcher R, Jonson B, Cumming G, Brew J. The concept of dead space with special reference to the single breath test for CO2. Br J Anaesth 1981;53:77–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Good ML. Capnography: A comprehensive review. San Francisco: American Society of Anesthesiologists Refresher Course Lectures, 1991:431Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hardwick M, Hutton P. Capnography: Fundamentals of current clinical practice. Curr Anaesth Crit Care 1990;3:176–180Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Paloheimo M, Valli M, Ahjopalo H. A guide to CO2 monitoring. Helsinki, Finland: Datex Instrumentarium, 1988Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Swedlow DB. Capnometry and capnography: The system anesthesia disaster early warning system. Sem Anesth 1986;3:194–205Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Adams AP. Capnography and pulse oximetry. In: Atkins RS, Adams AP, eds. Recent advances in anaesthesia and intensive care. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1989:155–175Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weingarten M. Respiratory monitoring of carbon dioxide and oxygen: A ten year perspective. J Clin Monit 1990;6:217–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ward SA. The capnogram: Scope and limitations. Sem Anesth 1987;3:217–228Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Curley MAQ, Thompson JE. End-tidal CO2 monitoring in critically ill infants and children. Pediatr Nurs 1990;16:397–403PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kalenda Z. Mastering infrared capnography. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Kerckebosch-Zeist, 1989:101Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fowler WS. Lung function studies III. Uneven pulmonary ventilation in normal subjects and in patients with pulmonary disease. J Appl Physiol 1949;2:283–299PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fowler WS. Lung function studies V. Respiratory dead space in old age and in pulmonary emphysema. J Clin Invest 1950;29:1439–1444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fletcher R, Werner O, Nordstrom L, Jonson B. Sources of error and their correction in the measurement of carbon dioxide elimination using the Siemens-Elema CO2 analyzer. Br J Anaesth 1983;55:177–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    From RP, Scamman FL. Ventilatory frequency influences accuracy of end-tidal CO2 measurements: Analysis of seven capnometers. Anesth Analg 1988;67:884–886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pasucci RC, Schena JA, Thompson JE. Comparison of a sidestream and mainstream capnometer in infants. Crit Care Med 1989;17:560–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brunner JX, Westenskow DR. How the rise time of carbon dioxide analysers influences the accuracy of carbon dioxide measurements. Br J Anaesth 1988:61:628–638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schena J, Thompson J, Crone RK. Mechanical influences on the capnogram. Crit Care Med 1984;12:672–674PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kumar AY, Bhavani-Shankar K, Moseley HSL, Delph Y. Inspiratory valve malfunction in a circle system: Pitfalls in capnography. Can J Anaesth 1992;39:997–999PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pyles ST, Berman LS, Modell JH. Expiratory valve dysfunction in a semiclosed circle anesthesia circuit—verification by analysis of carbon-dioxide waveform. Anesth Analg 1984;63:536–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Berman LS, Pyles ST. Capnographic detection of anaesthesia circle valve malfunctions. Can J Anaesth 1988;35:473–475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Podraza AG, Salem MR, Joseph NJ, Brenchley JL. Rebreathing due to incompetent unidirectional valves in the circle absorber system. Anesthesiology 1991;75:A422Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Badgwell JM, Kleinman SE, Heavner JE. Respiratory frequency and artifact affect the capnographic baseline in infants. Anesth Analg 1993;77:708–712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nunn JF. Applied physiology, ed 3. London: Butterworths, 1989Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fletcher R. Arterial to end-tidal CO2 tension differences. Anaesthesia 1987;42:210–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shankar KB, Moseley H, Kumar Y, Vemula V. Arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide tension differences during caesarean section anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1986;41:698–702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shankar KB, Moseley H, Kumar Y, et al. The arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide tension difference during anaesthesia for tubal ligations. Anaesthesia 1987;42:482–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Little, Brown and Company 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Bhavani-Shankar
    • 1
  • A. Y. Kumar
    • 2
  • H. S. L. Moseley
    • 2
  • R. Ahyee-Hallsworth
    • 2
  1. 1.From the Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBoston
  2. 2.Department of Anesthesia and Intensive CareUniversity of West Indies, Queen Elizabeth HospitalBarbados
  3. 3.Newton

Personalised recommendations