Advertisement

Protoplasma

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 412–431 | Cite as

Variation in the response to light in Amoeba proteus with special reference to the effects of salts and hydrogen-ion concentration

  • S. O. Mast
  • H. R. Hulpieu
Abhandlungen

Keywords

Reaction Time Culture Fluid Luminous Intensity Reaction Rime Average Reaction Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Baranetzski, J., 1876. Influence de la lumière sur les plasmodia des Myxomycètes. Mém. Soc. Sc. nat. Cherbourg, Vol. 19, pp. 321–360.Google Scholar
  2. Barth, L. G., 1929. The effects of acids and alkalies on the viscosity of protoplasm. Protoplasma, Vol. 7, pp. 506–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chambers, R., andReznikoff, P., 1926. Micrurgical studies in cell physiology. I. The action of the chlorides of Na, K, Ca, and Mg on the protoplasm of Amoeba proteus. Jour. Gen. Physiol., Vol. 8, pp. 369–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. — —, 1927. Micrurgical studies in cell physiology. III. The action of CO2 and some salts of Na, Ca, and K on the protoplasm ofAmoeba dubia. Jour. Gen. Physiol., Vol. 10, pp. 731–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davenport, C. B., 1897. Experimental Morphology. New York. 509 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Edwards, J. Graham, 1921. The effect of chemicals on locomotion inAmeba. I. Reactions to localized stimulation. Anat. Rec., Vol. 23, pp. 127–128.Google Scholar
  7. —, 1923. The effect of chemicals on locomotion inAmeba. I. Reactions to localized stimulation. Jour. Exp. Zool., Vol. 38, pp. 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. —, 1924. The action of certain reagents on amoeboid movement. II. Locomotor and physiological reactions. Brit. Jour. Exp. Biol., Vol. 1, pp. 571–595.Google Scholar
  9. Engelmann, T. W., 1879. Über Reizung kontraktilen Protoplasmus durch plötzliche Beleuchtung. Arch. f. d. ges. Physiol., Bd. 19, S. 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ewart, A. J., 1903. On the Physics and Physiology of Protoplasmic Streaming in Plants. Oxford Press. London. 131 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Folger, H. T., 1925. A quantitative study of reactions to light inAmoeba. Jour. Exp. Zool., Vol. 41, pp. 261–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harrington, N. R., andLeaming, E., 1900. The reactions ofAmoeba to light of different colors. Amer. Jour. Physiol., Vol. 3, pp. 9–16.Google Scholar
  13. Heilbrunn, L. V., 1928. The colloid chemistry of protoplasm. Berlin. 356 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Hopkins, D. L., 1926. The effect of hydrogen-ion concentration on locomotion and other life-processes inAmoeba proteus. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Vol. 12, pp. 311–315.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. —, 1928. The effect of certain physical and chemical factors on locomotion and other life-processes inAmoeba proteus. Jour. Morph. & Physiol., Vol. 45, pp. 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacobs, M. H., 1920. To what extent are the physiological effects of carbon dioxide due to hydrogen ions? Amer. Jour. Physiol., Vol. 51, pp. 321–331.Google Scholar
  17. —, 1922. The effects of carbon dioxide on the consistency of protoplasm. Biol. Bull., Vol. 42, pp. 14–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mast, S. O., 1910. Reactions in Amoeba to light. Jour. Exp. Zool., Vol. 9, pp. 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. —, 1928. Factors involved in changes of form inAmoeba. Jour. Exp. Zool., Vol. 51, pp. 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. —, 1929. Mechanics of locomotion inAmoeba proteus with special reference to the factors involved in attachment to the substratum. Protoplasma, Vol. 8, pp. 344–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. - 1931. Effect of salts, hydrogen-ion concentration and pure water on length of life inAmoeba proteus. Physiol. Zool., Vol. 4.Google Scholar
  22. Pantin, C. F. A., 1923. On the physiology of amoeboid movement. I. Jour. Marine Biol. Assoc., Vol. 13, pp. 24–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. —, 1926. On the physiology of amoeboid movement. III. The action of calcium. IV. The action of magnesium. Br. Jour. Exp. Biol., Vol. 3, pp. 275–312.Google Scholar
  24. Pringsheim, N., 1879. Über Lichtwirkung und Chlorophyllfunction in der Pflanze. Jahrb. f. wiss. Bot., Bd. 12, S. 288–437.Google Scholar
  25. Seifriz, W., 1929. The viscosity of protoplasm. Bull. National Res. Council, No. 69, pp. 229–261.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1930

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. O. Mast
    • 1
  • H. R. Hulpieu
    • 1
  1. 1.The Zoological Laboratory of the Johns Hopkins UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations