Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 36–48 | Cite as

Precision A.C. bridge set for measuring magnetic susceptibility of rocks and its anisotropy

  • Vít Jelínek
  • V. Bucha


A bridge set for measuring the magnetic susceptibility of rocks and its anisotropy is described. The classical transformer bridge has been supplemented with an auxiliary compensating arm for balancing the bridge without any mechanical infringement of the measuring coils. By employing this principle and the appropriate methods a sensitivityof 4 × 10 −8 SI units (3 × 10 −9 e.m.u./cm3) has been achieved for a sample of 8 cm3 in volume. In addition to its high sensitivity the device has a considerable accuracy, which makes it suitable for susceptibility anisotropy measurements even of samples with a very low susceptibility and only slight anisotropy. Well-reproducible results have been achieved for samples with a mean susceptibility of the order of10 −5 SI units with an anisotropy degree of only about 1.05.


Anisotropy Magnetic Susceptibility Structural Geology Anisotropy Measurement Considerable Accuracy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    I. Scollar: A Simple Direct Reading Susceptibility Bridge. J. Sci. Instrum. (J. Phys. E), Ser. 2, 1 (1968), 781.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    K. W. Christie, D. T. A. Symons: Apparatus for Measuring Magnetic Susceptibility and Its Anisotropy. Geol. Survey of Canada, Dep. of Energy, Mines and Resources, Paper 69–41, Catalogue No. M44-69-41, Ottawa 1969.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    R. W. Girdler: The Measurement and Computation of Anisotropy of Magnetic Susceptibility of Rocks. Geoph. J., 5 (1961), 34.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    M. D. Fuller: AC Bridge Methods for the Measurement of Susceptibility Anisotropy. Conference “Procedures in Palaeomagnetism”, circulation of abstracts, Newcastle upon Tyne 1964; see also in Methods in Palaeomagnetism, D. W. Collinson, K. M. Creer and S. K. Runcorn (Editors), Elsevier Pub. Co., Amsterdam 1967.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    C. T. Zahn: New Absolute Null Method for the Measurement of Magnetic Susceptibilities in Weak Low-Frequency Fields. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 34 (1963), 285.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    F. Janák: Determination of Anisotropy of Magnetic Susceptibility of Rocks. Studia geoph. et geod., 9 (1965), 290.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    F. Janák: Anisotropie magnetické susceptibility hornin. Ph. D. thesis, Inst. of Applied Geophysics, Brno 1966 (not published).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    F. Janák: A Brief Outline of Magnetic Susceptibility Anisotropy of Various Rock Types. Studia geoph. et geod., 17 (1973) (in print).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    G. R. Hext: The Estimations of Second-Order Tensors, with Related Tests and Designs. Biometrika, 50 (1963), 353.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    М. И. Агеев: Алгоритмы (51–100). Вычислительный центр AH CCCP, M. 1966.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academia, Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vít Jelínek
    • 1
    • 2
  • V. Bucha
  1. 1.Geophysics, national enterpriseBrno
  2. 2.Brno

Personalised recommendations