Morphologic conversion ofHelicobacter pylori from bacillary to coccoid form

  • M. Sörberg
  • M. Nilsson
  • H. Hanberger
  • L. E. Nilsson


The morphologic conversion ofHelicobacter pylori from bacillary to coccoid form was studied by microscopy, viable count on agar plates, and bioluminescence assay of bacterial ATP. When morphologic conversion from bacillary to coccoid form was detected by microscopy, the viable counts and the bacterial ATP decreased. No viable count was found after nine days of incubation, but bacterial ATP was still present. In these cultures in which only the coccoid form ofHelicobacter pylori was present, there was no accumulation of extracellular ATP, indicating no leaky cells. During the transition phase from the bacillary to the coccoid form ofHelicobacter pylori, the addition of fresh medium increased the intracellular ATP 26-fold. The coccoid form ofHelicobacter pylori had a 1000-fold lower ATP level per cell compared to the bacillary form, which indicates a decreased metabolic activity in the coccoid form. Addition of fresh medium to the coccoid cultures from days 9 and 10 increased the ATP level twofold. However, no conversion from coccoid to bacillary form was found in these cultures during prolonged incubation in fresh broth for four weeks. Such conversion needs to be demonstrated before it is proven that the coccoid form ofHelicobacter pylori is responsible for transmission and relapse of infection.


Agar Agar Plate Metabolic Activity Transition Phase Fresh Medium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Warren JR, Marshall B: Unidentified curved bacilli on gastric epithelium in active chronic gastritis. Lancet 1983, i: 1273–1275.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marshall BJ, Warren JR: Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration. Lancet 1984, i: 1311–1314.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goodwin CS, Armstrong JA, Marshall BJ:Campylobacter pyloridis, gastritis, and peptic ulceration. Journal of Clinical Pathology 1986, 39: 353–365.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    West AR Millar MR, Tompkins DS: Survival ofHelicobacter pylori in water and saline. Journal of Clinical Pathology 1990, 43: 609.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bode G, Mauch F, Malfertheiner P: The coccoid form ofHelicobacter pylori. Criteria for their viability. Epidemiology and Infection 1993, 111: 483–490.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nilius M, Ströhle A, Bode G, Malfertheiner P: Coccoid like form (CLF) ofHelicobacter pylori. Enzyme activity and antigenicity. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie 1993, 280: 259–272.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cellini L, Allocati N, Di Campli E, Dainelli B:Helicobacter pylori: a fickle germ. Microbiology and Immunology 1994, 38: 25–30.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Catrenich CE, Makin KM: Characterization of the morphologic conversion ofHelicobacter pylori bacillary to coccoid form. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 1991, 26, Supplement 181: 58–64.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mai U, Geis G, Leying H, Ruhl G, Opferkuch W: Dimorphism ofCampylobacter pylori. In: Megraud F, Lamoulaitte H (ed): Gastroduodenal pathology andCampylobacter pylori. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989, p. 29–33.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moshkowitz M, Gorea A, Arber N, Konikoff F, Berger S, Gilat T: Morphological transformation ofHelicobacter pylori during prolonged incubation. Association with decreased acid resistance. Journal of Clinical Pathology 1994, 47: 172–174.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jones DM, Currey A: The genesis of coccal form ofHelicobacter pylori. In: Malfertheiner P, Ditschuneit H (ed):Helicobacter pylori, gastritis and peptic ulcer. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990, p. 29–37.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eaton KA, Catrenich CE, Makin KM: Virulence of coccoid and bacillary forms ofHelicobacter pylori in gnotobiotic piglets. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1995, 171: 459–462.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ng L-K, Sherburne R, Taylor DE, Stiles ME: Morphological form and viability ofCampylobacter species studied by electron microscopy. Journal of Bacteriology 1985, 164: 338–343.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Samir SK, Setarrunnahar S, Suhas SC: Recovery of injuredCampylobacter jejuni cells after animal passage. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1991, 57: 3388–3389.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beumer RR, de Vries J, Rombouts FM:Campylobacter jejuni non-culturable coccoid cells. International Journal of Food Microbiology 1992, 15: 153–163.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Amano K, Shibata Y: Structural studies of peptidoglycans inCampylobacter species. Microbiology and Immunology 1992, 36: 961–967.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moran AR Upton ME: A comparative study of the rod and coccoid form ofCampylobacter jejuni ATCC 29428. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 1986, 60: 103–110.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chan W-Y, Hui P-K, Leung K-M, Chow J, Kwoki F, Ng C-S: Coccoid forms ofHelicobacter pylori in the human stomach. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 1994, 102: 503–507.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cellini L, Allocati N, Angelucci D, Lezzi T, Di Campli E, Marzio L, Dainelli B: CoccoidHelicobacter pylori not culturable in vitro reverts in mice. Microbiology and Immunology 1994, 38: 843–850.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jones DM, Sutcliffe EM, Curry A: Recovery of viable but not-culturableCampylobacter jejuni. Journal of General Microbiology 1991, 137: 2477–2482.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Buck GE, Parshall KA, Davis CP: Electron microscopy of the coccoid form ofCampylobacter jejuni. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1983, 18: 420–421.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moran AR Upton ME: Factors affecting production of coccoid forms byCampylobacter jejuni on solid media during incubation. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 1987, 62: 527–537.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Merell BR, Walker RI, Coolbaugh JC:Campylobacter fetus, ssp.jejuni, a newly recognised enteric pathogen: morphology and intestinal colonization. Scanning Electron Microscopy 1981, 41: 125–131.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Sörberg
    • 1
  • M. Nilsson
    • 2
  • H. Hanberger
    • 3
  • L. E. Nilsson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Infectious DiseasesDanderyd HospitalDanderydSweden
  2. 2.Department of Clinical MicrobiologyUniversity HospitalLinköpingSweden
  3. 3.Department of Infectious DiseasesUniversity HospitalLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations