Current Microbiology

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 61–67

Inhibitory factors involved in acetone-butanol fermentation byClostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum

  • Bhupinder K. Soni
  • Kumudeswar Das
  • Tarun K. Ghose
Article

Abstract

Studies carried out onClostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum (ATCC 27022) reveal that intracellular and extracellular inhibitors, including metabolic end-products, caused the inhibition of cell growth and solvent production. Butanol at the level of 13.0 g/liter was completely inhibitory to the growth of cells, whereas butyric acid totally inhibited the cell growth at a concentration of 8.7 g/liter. Investigations carried out on the effect of addition of culture filtrate concentrate and cell-free extract concentrate indicate that nonvolatile inhibitors produced by cells were also inhibitory for bioconversion. The butanol production was found to be reduced by 15%–20% on addition of cell-free extract concentrate. Inhibition by concentrates was enhanced in the presence of butanol. Addition of heat-sterilized concentrates resulted in a reduction of inhibition.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Bahl H, Gothwald M, Kuhn A, Rafe V, Andersch W, Gottschalk G (1986) Nutritional factors affecting the ratio of solvents produced byClostridium acetobutylicum. Appl Environ Microbiol 52:169–172Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boulanger Y, Schreiev S, Smith ICP (1976) Molecular details of anesthetic lipid interaction as seen by deuterium and phosphorous-31 nuclear magnetic resonance. Biochemistry 20:6824–6830Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bowles LK, Ellefson WL (1985) Effects of butanol onClostridium acetolbutylicum. Appl Environ Microbiol 50:1165–1170Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Browing JL, Akutsu H (1982) Local anesthetic and divalent cations have the same effect on the head groups of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanol amine. Biochim Biophys Acta 684:172–178Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Calam CT (1980) Isolation ofClostridium acetobutylicum strains producing butanol and acetone. Biotech Lett 2:111–116Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Datta R, Zeikus JG (1985) Modulation of acetone-butanol-ethanol fermentation by carbon monoxide and organic acids. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:522–529Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gottwald M, Gottschalk G (1985) The internal pH ofClostridium acetobutylicum and its effect on the shift from acid to solvent formation. Arch Microbiol 143:42–46Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huang L, Forsberg CW, Gibbins LNC (1986) Influence of external pH and fermentation products onClostridium acetobutylicum intracellular pH and cellular distribution of fermentation products. Appl Environ Microbiol 51:1230–1234Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang L, Gibbins LN, Forsberg CW (1985) Transmembrane pH gradient and membrane potential inClostridium acetobutylicum during growth under acetogenic and solventogenic conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 30:1043–1047Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ingram LO (1976) Adaptation of membrane lipids to alcohol. J Bacteriol 125:670–678Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim BN, Bellows P, Datta R, Zeikus JG (1984) Control of carbon and electron flow inClostridium acetobutylicum fermentation: utilization of carbon monoxide to inhibit hydrogen production and to enhance butanol yields. Appl Environ Microbiol 48:764–770Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lenaz G, Parenti CG, Sechi AM (1975) Lipid-protein inter-actions in mitochondria: changes in mitochondrial adenosine triphosphatase activity induced by n-butyl alcohol. Arch Biochem Biophys 167:72–79Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lenz TG, Moreira AR (1980) Economic evaluation of acetone-butanol fermentation. Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev 19:478–483Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leung JCY, Wang DIC (1981) Production of acetone and butanol byClostridium acetobutylicum in continuous culture using free cells and immobilized cells. Proc 2nd World Congr Chem Eng 1:348–352Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moreira AR, Ulmer DC, Linden JC (1981) Butanol toxicity in the butyric fermentation. Biotech Bioeng Symp 11:567–579Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ogata S, Hongo M (1974) Lysis induced by sodium ion and its correlation to lytic enzyme systems inClostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum. J Gen Microbiol 81:315–323Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Paterson SJ, Butler KW, Huang P, Belle JL, Smith ICP, Schneider H (1972) The effect of alcohol on lipid bilayers: a spin label study. Biochim Biophys Acta 266:597–602Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schoutens GH, Groot WH (1985) Economic feasibility of the production of isopropanol-butanol-ethanol fuels from whey permeate. Proc Biochem 20:117–121Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Soni BK, Das K, Soucaille P, Goma G (1986) Batch and continuous studies for improved productivity byClostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum for acetone-butanol fermentation. Biotech Bioeng Symp No 17:591–603Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Soni BK, Soucaille P, Goma G (1986) Effect of phosphate cycling on production of acetone-butanol byClostridium acetobutylicum in chemostat culture. Biotech Bioeng Symp No 17:239–252Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Soucaille P, Goma G (1986) Acetonobutylic fermentation byClostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824: Autobacteriocin production, properties and effects. Current Microbiol 13:163–169Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Terraciano JS, Kashket ER (1986) Intracellular conditions required for initiation of solvent production byClostridium acetobutylicum. Appl Environ Microbiol 52:86–91Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yoshino S, Ogata S, Hayashida S (1982) Some properties of autolysin ofClostridium saccharoperbutylactonicum. Agric Biochem 46:1243–1248Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bhupinder K. Soni
    • 1
  • Kumudeswar Das
    • 1
  • Tarun K. Ghose
    • 1
  1. 1.Biochemical Engineering Research CenterIndian Institute of TechnologyNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Department de Genie Biochemique et AlimentaireINSAToulouse, CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations