Advertisement

Journal of Industrial Microbiology

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 61–68 | Cite as

Production of 21% (v/v) ethanol by fermentation of very high gravity (VHG) wheat mashes

  • K. C. Thomas
  • W. M. Ingledew
Article

Summary

Very high gravity wheat mashes containing 300 g or more sugares per liter were prepared by enzymatic hydrolysis of starch and fermented with a commercial preparation of active dry yeast. The active dry yeast used in this study was a blend of several strains ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae. The fermentation was carried out at 20°C at different pitching rates (inoculation levels) with and without the addition of yeast extract as nutrient supplement. At a pitching rate of 76 million cells per g of mash an ethanol yield of 20.4% (v/v) was obtained. To achieve this yeast extract must be added to the wheat mash as nutrient supplement. When the pitching rate was raised to 750 million cells per g of mash, the ethanol yield increased to 21.5% (v/v) and no nutrient supplement was required. The efficiency of conversion of sugar to ethanol was 97.6% at the highest pitching rate. This declined slightly with decreasing pitching rate. A high proportion of yeast cells lost viability at high pitching rates. It is suggested that nutrients released from yeast cells that lost viability and lysed, contributed to the high yield of ethanol in the absence of any added nutrients.

Key words

Very high gravity Wheat mash fermentation Fuel alcohol High pitching rates 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Caldwell, D.E. and J.J. Germida. 1985. Evaluation of difference imagery for visualizing and quantitating microbial growth. Can. J. Microbiol. 31: 35–44.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Casey, G.P. and W.M. Ingledew. 1983. High-gravity brewing: Influence of pitching rate and wort gravity on early yeast viability. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 41: 148–152.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Casey, G.P., C.A. Magnus and W.M. Ingledew. 1984. Highgravity brewing: Effect of nutrition on yeast composition, fermentative ability and alcohol production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 48: 639–646.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Del Rosario, E.J., K.J. Lee and P.L. Rogers. 1979. Kinetics of alcohol fermentation at high yeast levels. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 21: 1477–1482.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Doin, P.A., J.E. Olivo, V.L. Varella, B.R. Concone and A.G. Pinto. 1984. The effects of initial cell concentration on the alcoholic fermentation of cassava. Ferment. Technol. 62: 195–199.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gibbons, W.R. and C.A. Westby. 1986. Effects of inoculum size on solid-phase fermentation of fodder beets for fuel ethanol production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 52: 960–962.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lagunas, R. 1979. Energetic irrelevance of aerobiosis forS. cerevisiae growing on sugars. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 27: 139–146.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lagunas, R., C. Dominguez, A. Busturia and M.J. Saez. 1982. Mechanisms of appearance of the Pasteur effect inSaccharomyces cerevisiae: Inactivation of sugar transport systems. J. Bacteriol. 152: 19–25.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Margaritis, A. and F.J.A. Merchant. 1984. Advances in ethanol production using immobilized cell systems. CRC Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 1: 339–393.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miller, G.L. 1959. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal. Chem. 31: 426–428.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nagodawithana, T.W., C. Castellano and K.H. Steinkraus. 1974. Effect of dissolved oxyen, temperature, initial cell count and sugar concentration on viability ofSacchromyces cerevisiae in rapid fermentations. Appl. Microbiol. 28: 383–391.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nagodawithana, T.W. and K.H. Steinkraus. 1976. Influence of the rate of ethanol production and accumulation on the viability ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae in rapid fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 31: 158–162.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Neijssel, O.M. and D.W. Tempest. 1976. The role of energy spilling-reactions in the growth ofKlebsiella aerogenes NCTC 418 in aerobic chemostat culture. Arch. Microbiol. 110: 305–311.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    O'Connor-Cox, E.S.C. and W.M. Ingledew. 1991. Alleviation of the effects of nitrogen limitation in high gravity worts through increased inoculum rates. J. Ind. Microbiol. 7: 89–96.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    O'Connor-Cox, E.S.C., J. Paik and W.M. Ingledew. 1991. Improved ethanol yields through supplementation with excess assimilable nitrogen. J. Ind. Microbiol. 8: 45–52.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Paik, J., N.H. Low and W.M. Ingledew. 1991. Malt extract: Relationship of chemical composition to fermentability. J. Am. Brew. Chem. 49: 8–13.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Searle, B.A. and B.H. Kirsop. 1979. Sugar utilization by a brewing yeast in relation to the growth and maintenance phases of metabolism. J. Inst. Brew. 85: 342–345.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Strehaiano, P., M. Mota and G. Goma. 1983. Effects of inoculum level on kinetics of alcoholic fermentation. Biotechnol. Lett. 5: 135–140.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thomas, K.C. and W.M. Ingledew. 1990. Fuel alcohol production: Effects of free amino nitrogen on fermentation of very-high-gravity wheat mashes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56: 2046–2050.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thomas, K.C. and W.M. Ingledew. 1992. The relationship of low lysine and high arginine concentrations to efficient ethanolic fermentation of wheat mash. Can. J. Microbiol. (in press).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vega, J.L., A.R. Navarro, E.C. Clausen and J.L. Gaddy. 1987. Effects of inoculum size on ethanol inhibition modeling and other fermentor parameters. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 29: 633–638.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    White, J. 1955. Effect of seeding rate and sugar concentration on yeast growth and fermentation in aerated glucose worts. J. Inst. Brew. 61: 146–150.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Industrial Microbiology 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. C. Thomas
    • 1
  • W. M. Ingledew
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Applied Microbiology and Food ScienceUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations