Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 209–221

Spatial variability and interpolation of daily precipitation amount

  • E. G. Beek
  • A. Stein
  • L. L. F. Janssen


Daily precipitation amounts show spatial variation over sub-continential regions. Point measurements, representative for regions of land, have to be interpolated towards unobserved locations. In this study four days in 1984 were selected to investigate the spatial variability of daily precipitation amount in North-western Europe in relation to the meteorological conditions. Data were interpolated using Kriging. Crossvalidation was used to compare interpolated values with measured values. Large differences in the spatial structure of daily precipitation amount are obsered as a result of different meterological conditions. Stratification of the study area into a coastal, a mountainous and an interior stratum proved to be successful, reducing the Mean Squared Error of Prediction with up to 55%.

Key words

geostatistics precipitation water balance models semivariogram kriging spatial variation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barrett, E.C.; Martin, D.W. 1981: The use of satellite data in rainfall monitoring. Londong: Academic Press, 340ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Bastin, G.; Lorent, B.; Duque, C.; Gevers, M. 1984: Optimal estimation of the average areal rainfall and optimal selection of rain gauge locations. Water Resources Research 20 (4), 463–470Google Scholar
  3. Beek, E.G. 1991: Interpolation of daily means of meteorological variables; interpolation of European weather data to a regular grid. Department of Surveying and Remote Sensing, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands, 31ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Bigg, G.R. 1991: Kriging and intrregional rainfall variability in England. Int. J. of Climatology 11, 663–675Google Scholar
  5. Bras, R.L.; Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. 1985: Random functions and hydrology. Addison-Wesley, Amsterdam, 559pGoogle Scholar
  6. Burgess, T; Webster, R. 1980: Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping I. The semivariogram andpunctual kriging. The Journal of Soil Science 31, 315–331Google Scholar
  7. Burrough, P.A. 1986: Principles of geographical information systems for land resources assessment. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 193ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Corsten, L.C.A. 1989: Interpolation and optimal linear prediction. Statistica Neerlandica 43, 69–84Google Scholar
  9. Creutin, J; Obled, C. 1982: Objective analyses and mapping techniques for rainfall fields: An objective comparison. Water Resources Research 18 (2), 413–431Google Scholar
  10. Delhomme, J.P. 1978: Kriging in the hydrosciences. Advan. in Water Resources 1 (5), 251–266Google Scholar
  11. Doorenbos, J.: Agro-meteorological field stations. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  12. D'ouza, G.; Barrett, E.; Power, C. 1990: Satellite rainfall estimation techniques using visible and infrared imagery. Remote Sensing Reviews, 379–414Google Scholar
  13. Finkelstein, P.L. 1984: The spatial anlaysis of acid precipitation data. J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol. 23, 52–62Google Scholar
  14. Gandin, L.S. 1965: Objective analysis of meteorological fields (English translation). Israeli program for scientific translations, Jerusalem, 242ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Journel, A.; Huijbregts, C. 1978: Mining geostatistics. London: Academic Press, 600ppGoogle Scholar
  16. Kruizinga, S.; Yperlaan, G. 1978: Spatial interpolation of daily totals of rainfall. Journal of Hydrology 36, 65–73Google Scholar
  17. Lebel, T.; Bastin, G. 1985: Variogram identification by the mean-squared interpolation error method with application to hydrologic fields. Journal of Hydrology 77, 31–56Google Scholar
  18. Lorenc, A.C. 1986: Analysis methods fornumerical weather prediction. Quart. Journal Roy. Meteor. Soc., 112, 1177–1194Google Scholar
  19. Matheron, G. 1971: The theory of regionalized variables and its applications. Les Cahiers du Centre de Morphologie Mathématique, No. 5. Paris: Ecole de Mines de Paris, 211ppGoogle Scholar
  20. McIntosh, D.H.; Thom, A.S. 1981: Essentials of meteorology. The Wykeham science series vol. 3. London: Wykeham, 240ppGoogle Scholar
  21. Ripley, B. 1981: Spatial staistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 252ppGoogle Scholar
  22. Sevruk, B., 1989: Wind induced measurement error for high intensity rains. In: Sevruk, B. Precipitation measurement. WMO/IAHS/ETH Workshop on precipitation measurement, Zürich.Google Scholar
  23. Shih, F. 1990: Satellite data and geographic information system for rainfall estimation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 116 (3), 319–331Google Scholar
  24. Stein, A. 1991: Spatial interpolation. Doctoral thesis, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 236ppGoogle Scholar
  25. Stein, A.; Hoogerwerf, M.; Bouman, J. 1988; Use of soil map delineations to improve (co-)kriging of point data on moisture deficits. Geoderma 43, 163–177Google Scholar
  26. Stein, A.; Corsten, L.C.A. 1991: Universal kriging and cokriging as a regression procedure. Biometrics 47, 575–589Google Scholar
  27. Thiébaux, H.J.; Pedder, M.A. 1987: Spatial objective analysis with applications in atmospheric science. Academic press, London.Google Scholar
  28. Van Diepen, C.A.; Wolf, J.; Van Keulen, H.; Rappoldt, C. 1989: WOFOST: a simulation model of crop production. Soil Use and Management 5, 16–24Google Scholar
  29. Venkatram, A. 1988: On the use of kriging in the spatial analysis of acid precipitation data. Atmos. Environ. 22, 1963–1975Google Scholar
  30. Webster, R. 1985: Quantitative spatial analysis of soil in the field. In: Stewart, B.A. (ed.) Advances in soil science 3, pp. 1–70. New York: Springer VerlagGoogle Scholar
  31. Witter, V. 1984: Heterogeneity of Dutch rainfall. Doctoral thesis, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 204 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. G. Beek
    • 1
  • A. Stein
    • 2
  • L. L. F. Janssen
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Dept. of Surveying and Remote SensingWageningen Agricultural UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Dept. Soil Science and GeologyWageningen Agricultural UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.The Winand Staring Centre for Integrated Land, Soil and Water ResearchWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations