Advertisement

Research in Engineering Design

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 131–147 | Cite as

Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation

  • Donald A. Schon
Article

Abstract

What are the prospects for applying the methods of Artificial Intelligence to architectural designers' knowing-in-action? David Marr (Marr, 1982) has advanced the idea of a computational theory of vision, which requires defining the information processing tasks carried out in vision. I ask, by analogy: what are the information processing tasks carried out in design? In order to answer this question, I propose, one ought to study design phenomenology. I illustrate several such studies, based on observations of a design studio, the performance of a design exercise, and the playing of a design game. In order to simulate the transactions with a design situation illustrated in these studies, the computer would have to carry out processes that begin prior to the presentation of what are normally defined as “design inputs.” Such processes involve the construction of “design worlds,” and they include: the simplest unit of design experimentation, the designer's seeing-moving-seeing; constructing figures from marks on a page; appreciating design qualities; setting design intentions and problems; recognizing the unintended consequences of move experiments; storing and deploying prototypes; and communicating across divergent design worlds. I conclude that the practitioners of Artificial Intelligence in design would do better to aim at producing design assistants rather than knowledge systems phenomenologically equivalent to those of designers.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Unintended Consequence Knowledge System Design Intention Processing Task 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, Christopher,Notes Toward a Synthesis of Form Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1968.Google Scholar
  2. Billington, David,The Tower and The Bridge Basic Books, Inc., New York, 1983.Google Scholar
  3. Dewey, John and Bentley, Arthur F.,Knowing and the Known The Beacon Press, Boston, 1949.Google Scholar
  4. Goodman, Nelson,Ways of Worldmaking Hackett and Company, Indianapolis, 1978.Google Scholar
  5. Habraken, John,The Appearance of the Form Atwater Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1986.Google Scholar
  6. Hillier, Bill and Leaman, Adrian, “How Is Design Possible? A Sketch for a Theory,” Report of The Design Activity International Conference, August 29–31, 1973.Google Scholar
  7. Marr, David,Vision, W.H. Freeman and Company, 1982.Google Scholar
  8. Vickers, Geoffrey, Unpublished Memorandum, Division for Study and Research in Education, M.I.T., 1978.Google Scholar
  9. Wertheimer, Max,Productive Thinking The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1945.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald A. Schon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Urban Studies and PlanningMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations