Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 8, Issue 1–2, pp 156–165 | Cite as

Gender, ecology, and the science of survival: Stories and lessons from Kenya

  • Dianne E. Rocheleau


Sustainable development and biodiversity initiatives increasingly include ethnoscience, yet the gendered nature of rural people's knowledge goes largely unrecognized. The paper notes the current resurgence of ethnoscience research and states the case for including gendered knowledge and skills, supported by a brief review of relevant cultural ecology and ecofeminist field studies. The author argues the case from the point of view of better, more complete science as well as from the ethical imperative to serve women's interests as the “daily managers of the living environment”. In the interests of both objectives the paper advocates an ethnoscience research approach based on empowerment of rural people, rather than simple extraction of their knowledge. The Kenyan case study of women's agroforestry work follows their response to the drought and famine of 1985 and chronicles the unfolding discovery of women's ecological, political, and social science as gendered survival skills. The case is re-counted as a story, in keeping with an explicit choice to learn through participation and to report through storytelling. The experience of rural women and researchers during the drought provides several lessons for both groups about their respective knowledge systems, their agroforestry work, and the relationship of both to local and national political economy.


Knowledge System Rural Woman Rural People Simple Extraction Gender Nature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bebbington, Tony. 1990. “Farmer Knowledge, Institutional Resources and Sustainable Agricultural Strategies: A Case Study from the Eastern Slopes of the Peruvian Andes.”Bulletin of Latin American Research. 9 (2). Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  2. Brokensha, David, D. M. Warren and O. Werner. (eds.) 1980.Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Development. University Press of America. Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
  3. Bromley, D. 1986. “The common property challenge.” InNational Academcy of Science Proceedings of the Conferences on Common Property Resource Management. National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  4. Carney, Judith. 1988. “Struggles over land and crops in an irrigated rice scheme: The Gambia.” In J. Davison.Women and Land Tenure in Africa. Westview. Boulder.Google Scholar
  5. Chambers, Robert. 1986. “Normal Professionalism, New Paradigms and Development.” IDS Discussion Paper 227. IDS Sussex.Google Scholar
  6. Chavangi, N.A. 1984. “Cultural aspects of fuelwood procurement in Kakamega District, KWDP“Working Paper No. 4. Kenya Wood Fuel Development Project. Nairobi.Google Scholar
  7. Dankelman, Irene and Joan Davidson. 1988.Women and Environment in the Third World: Alliance for the Future. Earthscan Publications Ltd. London.Google Scholar
  8. Fernandez, Maria. 1988. “Technological domains of women in mixed farming systems of Andean peasant communities.” In S. Poats, M. Schmink and A. Spring. Eds.Gender Issues in Farming Systems Research and Extension. Westview Press. Boulder.Google Scholar
  9. Fleuret, Ann. 1979. “Methods for evaluation of the role of fruits and wild greens in Shambaa diet: a case study.”Medical Anthropology. Spring, 1979.Google Scholar
  10. Guha, Ramachandra. 1989. “Radical American environmentalism and wildemess preservation: a Third World critique.”Environmental Ethics. 11(1) 71–83.Google Scholar
  11. Hecht, Susanna and Alexander Cockburn. 1988.The Fate of the Forest: Developers, Destroyers and Defenders of the Amazon. Verso. New York.Google Scholar
  12. Hoskins, Marilyn. 1983.Rural Women, Forest Outputs and Forestry Projects. F.A.O.Rome..Google Scholar
  13. Jain, Shobita. 1984. “Standing up for trees: Women's role in the Chipko movement.”Unasylva 36(146): 12–20.Google Scholar
  14. Jiggins, Janice. 1986. “Problems of Understanding and Communication at the Interface of Knowledge Systems.” In S. Poats, M. Schmink, and A. Spring. Eds.Gender Issues in Farming Systems Research and Extension. Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
  15. Jiggins, Janice. 1986. “Women and Seasonality: Coping with Crisis and Calamity.” In R. Longhurst Ed.Seasonality and Poverty. IDS Bulletin 17(3):9–18.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, Douglas H. and D.M. Anderson. 1988.The Ecology of Survival: Case studies from Northesat African history. Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
  17. Joshi, G. 1982.Menpropose, women oppose the destruction of forests. Information Service on Science and Society-Related Issues. Centre for Science and Environment. Delhi.Google Scholar
  18. Juma, Calestous. 1988.The Gene Hunters: Biotechnology and the Scramble for Seeds. Princeton University Press. Princeton.Google Scholar
  19. Juma, Calestous. 1989.Biological Diversity and Innovation: Conserving and Utilizing Genetic Resources in Kenya. African Centre for Technology Studies. Nairobi.Google Scholar
  20. King, Ynestra. 1989. “The ecology of feminism and the feminism of ecology.” In Judith Plant. Ed.Healing the Wounds. New Society Publishers. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  21. Kiriro, Amos and C. Juma. Eds. 1989.Gaining Ground: Institutional Innovations in Land use Management in Kenya. African Centre for Technology Studies. Nairobi.Google Scholar
  22. Matthai, Wangari. 1985. The Green Belt Movement. Wangari Matthai, P.O.Box 14832, Nairobi.Google Scholar
  23. Mendes, C. 1989. Fight for the Forest:Chico Mendes in His Own Words. Latin America Bureau. London.Google Scholar
  24. Merchant, Carolyn. 1980.The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution. Harper and Row. San Francisco.Google Scholar
  25. Merchant, Carolyn. 1989.Ecological Revolutions: Nature, Gender and Science in New England. The University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  26. Meyerhoff, Elizabeth. 1982.The Socio-economic and Ritual Roles of Pokot Women. Anthropology Ph.D. Thesis. Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  27. Moore, Henrietta. 1988.Feminism and Anthropology. University of Minnesota Press. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  28. Moore, Henrietta. 1986.Space, Text and Gender: An Anthropological Study of the Marakwet of Kenya. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Moore, Henrietta, and Megan Vaughan. 1987. “Cutting down trees: women, nutrition and agricultural change in the Northern Province of Zambia, 1920–1986.”African Affairs 86(345):523–40.Google Scholar
  30. Mortimer, Michael. 1989.Adapting to Drought. Cambridge University. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  31. Munyao, P. 1987. “The importance of gathered food and medicinal plant species in Kakuyuni and Kathama are as in Machakos.” Annex 1 in K.K. Wachira (ed.)Women's Use of Off-Farm and Boundary Lands: Agroforestry Potentials. Final Project Report. ICRAF. Nairobi.Google Scholar
  32. Murphy, Yolanda and Robert Murphy. 1974.Women of the Forest. Columbia University Press. New York.Google Scholar
  33. Myers, Norman. 1979.The Sinking Ark. Oxford. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  34. Nyerere, Julius. 1989. Testimony before World Commission on Environment and Development, October, 1986. Harare, Zimabawe.Google Scholar
  35. Parkipuny, M.S. Ole. 1988. “The Ngorongoro Crater Issue: The Point of View of the Indigenous Maasai Community of Ngorongoro.” Paper presented to the International Congress on Nature Management and Sustainable Development. University of Groningen, The Netherlands. Dec. 6–9, 1988.Google Scholar
  36. Posey, Daryl. 1985. “Indigenous management of tropical forest ecosystems: the case of the Kayapo Indians of the Brazilian Amazon.”Agrofor estry Systems 3(2):139–158.Google Scholar
  37. Redclift, Michael. 1987.Sustainable Development: Exploring the Contradictions. Methuen and Co. New York.Google Scholar
  38. Richards, Paul. 1985.Indigenous Agricultural Revolution: Ecology and Food Production in West Africa. Hutchinson: London.Google Scholar
  39. Richards, Paul. 1986.Coping with Hunger: Hazard and Experiment in an African Rice-Farming System. Allen and Unwin. London.Google Scholar
  40. Rocheleau, D. 1991. “Participatory research in agroforestry; Learning from experience and expanding our repetoire.”Agroforestry Systems: 9(1).Google Scholar
  41. Rocheleau, D. 1989. “The gender division of work, resources and rewards in agroforestry systems.” In A.E. Kilewe, K.M. Kealey and K.K. Kebaara eds.Agroforestry Development in Kenya. ICRAF. Nairobi. pp. 228–245.Google Scholar
  42. Rocheleau, D. 1987. “A Land User Perspective for Agroforestry Research and Action.” In H. Gholz ed.Agroforestry: Realities, Possibilities and Potentials. Martinus Nijhoff. Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  43. Rocheleau, D. 1988. “Women, trees and tenure.” In L. Fortmann and J. Bruce eds.Whose Trees? Proprietary dimensions offorestry. Westview. Boulder. pp. 254–272.Google Scholar
  44. Rocheleau, D.E. 1985 “Criteria for re-appraisal and re-design: intra-household and between-household aspects of FSRE in three Kenyan agroforestry projects.” ICRAF Working Paper No. 37. ICRAF, Nairobi.Google Scholar
  45. Rocheleau, D.E., K.K. Wachira, L. Malaret and B. Wanjohi, 1989. “Ethnoecological methods to complement local knowledge and farmer innov ations in agroforestry.” In A Pacey, R. Chambers and L. Thrupp eds.Farmer First. Intermediate Technology. London.Google Scholar
  46. Rocheleau, D., P. Khasiala, M. Munyao, M. Mutiso, E. Opala, B. Wanjohi and A. Wanjuana. 1985.Women's use of off-farm lands: Implications for agroforestry research. Projectreport to the Ford Foundation. Mimeo. ICRAF. Nairobi.Google Scholar
  47. Rocheleau, D. and A. Hoek. 1984. “The Application of Ecosystems and Landscape Analysis in Agroforestry Diagnosis and Design: A Case Study from Kathama Sublocation, Machakos District, Kenya.” Working Paper No. 11. ICRAF. Nairobi.Google Scholar
  48. Rocheleau, D. and L. Fortmann. 1988. “Women's spaces and women's places in rural food production systems: The spatial distribution of women's rights, responsibilities and activities.” Paper presented to the 7th World Congress of Rural Sociology. 25 June–1 July. Bologna, Italy.Google Scholar
  49. Rocheleau, D., F. Weber, and A. Field-Juma. 1988.Agroforestry in Dryland Africa. ICRAF. Nairobi.Google Scholar
  50. Rocheleau, D. and M. Jama. 1989.Annual Report of Farming Systems and Ethnoecology Research Project. Summary of interview with elders at Kathama. manuscript. IDS. Nairobi.Google Scholar
  51. Roe, Emery and Louise Fortmann. 1981. Season and Strategy:The changing or ganization of the rural water sector in Botswana. Rural Development Committee. Cornell University. Ithaca.Google Scholar
  52. Sarukhan, Jose. 1985. “Ecological and social overviews of ethnobotanical research.”Economic Botany. 39:431–435.Google Scholar
  53. Schmink, Marianne and Charles Wood. 1990. “Contested Frontiers in Amazonia.” Manuscript. Center for Latin American Studies. University of Florida. Gainesville.Google Scholar
  54. Shiva, Vandana. 1988.Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development. Zed Press. London.Google Scholar
  55. Shostak, Marjorie. 1981.Nisa: The Life and Words of a!Kung Woman. Vintage Books. New York.Google Scholar
  56. Stamp, Patricia. 1989.Technology, Gender and Power in Africa. International Development Research Centre (IDRC). Ottawa.Google Scholar
  57. Talle, Aude. 1988.Women at a Loss: Changes in Maasai Pastor alism and Their Effectson Gender Relations. University of Stockholm. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  58. Toledo, Victor M. 1989. “The ecological rationality of peasant production.” In M. Altieri and S. Hecht Eds.Agroecology and Small Farm Development. CRC Press. Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  59. Thrupp, L.A. 1989. “Legitimizing Local Knowledge: From Displacement to Empowerment for Third World People.”Agriculture and Human Values. 6(3): 13–24.Google Scholar
  60. Wachira, K.K. 1987.Women's use of off-farm and boundary lands: agroforestry potentials. Project report to the Ford Foundation. Mimeo. Nairobi. ICRAF. 137 pp.Google Scholar
  61. Wamalwa, Betty Nafuna. 1989. “Indigenous knowledge and natural resources.” In Kiriro, Amos and C. Juma. Eds.Gaining Ground: Institutional Innovations in Land Use Management in Kenya. African Centre for Technology Studies. Nairobi.Google Scholar
  62. Wanjohi, B. 1987. Women's groups' gathered plants and their potentials in the Kathama area. Annex 1 in K.K. Wachira, (ed.) Women's Use of Off-Farm and Boundary Lands: Agroforestry Potentials. Final Project Report. ICRAF. Nairobi.Google Scholar
  63. Warren, D.M. 1988. “Linking scientific and indigenous agricultural systems.” In J. Lin Compton Ed.The Transformation of International Agricultural Research and Development. Westview. Boulder.Google Scholar
  64. Watts, Michael. 1983.Silent Violence: Food Famine and Peasantry in Northern Nigeria. University of California Press. Berkeley.Google Scholar
  65. Watts, Michael. 1988. “Struggles over land, struggles over meaining: some thoughts on naming, peasant resistance and the politics of place.” In R. Golledge, H. Coucelis and P. Gould Eds.A Ground for Common Search. Geographical Press. Santa Barbara.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dianne E. Rocheleau

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations