Advertisement

Neuroradiology

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 207–211 | Cite as

CT analysis of missile head injury

  • N. Bešenski
  • D. Jadro-Šantel
  • F. Jelavić-Koic
  • D. Pavić
  • D. Mikulić
  • K. Glavina
  • J. Mašković
Diagnostic Neuroradiology

Abstract

Between August 1991 and December 1992, CT was performed on 154 patients who had suffered missile head injury during the war in the Republic of Croatia. In 54% CT was performed 1–24 h after injury, and in 27% follow-up CT was also obtained. The wounds were penetrating, tangential or perforating (45%, 34% and 21%, respectively). Haemorrhage was the most frequent lesion in the brain (84%). Follow-up CT evolution of haemorrhage, oedema, cerebritis, abscess, secondary vascular lesions, necrosis, encephalomalacia and hydrocephalus. The most dynamic changes occurred 7–14 days after injury. In 14% of cases, deep cerebral lesions were found in the corpus callosum, septum pellucidum periventricular region and pons, although bone and shell fragments were in a different part of the brain parenchyma. Such lesions were found in penetrating injuries only. CT proved very useful for assessing the extent and type of lesions. Although different mechanisms of brain damage in missile head injury are known, here they are, to the best of our knowledge, shown for the first time by CT.

Key words

Computed tomography Head injury Gunshot wound Missile wound Retained bone 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Siccardi D, Cavaliere R, Pau A, Lubinu F, Turtas S, Viale GL (1991) Penetrating craniocerebral missile injuries in civilians: a retrospective analysis of 314 cases. Surg Neurol 35: 455–460Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fackler ML, Malinowski JA (1985) The wound profile: a visual method for quantifying gunshot wound components. J Trauma 25: 522–529Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Harvey EN, Korr IM, Oster G (1946) Secondary damage in wounding due to pressure changes accompanying the passage of high velocity missiles. Surgery 21: 218–239Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang Z, Tang C, Chen X, Shi T (1988) Early pathomorphologic characteristics of the wound track caused by fragments. J Trauma 28 [Suppl]: 89–94Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rosenwasser RH, Andrews DW, Jiménez DF (1991) Penetrating craniocerebral trauma. Surg Clin North Am 71: 305–316Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Purvis JT (1966) Craniocerebral injuries due to missiles and fragments. In: Ceveness WF, Walker AE (eds) Head injury. Lippincott, Philadelphia pp 133–141Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kirkpatrick JB, Maio VD (1978) Civilian gunshot wounds of the brain. J Neurosurg 49: 185–198Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kirkpatrick JB (1988) Gunshots and other penetrating wounds of the central nervous system. In: Leestma JE, Kirkpatrick JB (eds) Forensic neuropathology. Raven Press, New York, pp 276–299Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaufman HH, Sadhu VK, Clifton GL, Handel SF (1980) Delayed intracerebral haematoma due to traumatic aneurysm caused by a shotgun wound: a problem in prophylaxis. Neurosurgery 6: 181–184Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haddad FS (1978) Nature and management of penetrating head injuries during the civil war in Lebanon. Can J Surg 21: 233–240Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aarabi B (1988) Traumatic aneurysm of brain due to high velocity missile head wounds. Neurosurgery 22: 1056–1062Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Crockard HA, Brown FD, Calica AB, Johns LM, Mullan S (1977) Physiological consequences of experimental cerebral missile injury and use of data analysis to predict survival. J Neurosurg 46: 784–794Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rich NM, Amato JJ, Billy LJ (1971) Arterial thrombosis secondary to temporary cavitation. Surg Digest 6: 12–19Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aarabi B (1989) Causes of infections in penetrating head wounds in the Iran-Iraq war. Neurosurgery 25: 923–926Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brandvold B, Levi L, Feinsod M, George ED (1990) Penetrating craniocerebral injuries in the Israeli involvement in the Lebanese conflict, 1982–1985. J Neurosurg 72: 15–21Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grčević N (1988) The concept of inner cerebral trauma. Scand J Rehabil Med [Suppl] 17: 1–7Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lindenberg R, Freitag E (1960) The mechanism of cerebral contusions. Arch Pathol 69: 440–469Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jadro-Šantel D, Grĉević N, Bešenski N, Kalousek M (1989) The inner cerebral trauma: the correlative pathology with CT scans. In: Aichner F, Gerstenbrand F, Grĉević N (eds) Neuroimaging II. Fischer, Stuttgart, pp 263–273Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bešenski N, Jadro-Šantel D, Grĉević N (1992) Patterns of lesions of corpus callosum in inner cerebral trauma visualized by computed tomography. Neuroradiology 34: 126–130Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hopkins DAW, Marshall TK (1967) Firearm injuries. Br J Surg 54: 344–353Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Bešenski
    • 1
  • D. Jadro-Šantel
    • 2
  • F. Jelavić-Koic
    • 3
  • D. Pavić
    • 2
  • D. Mikulić
    • 4
  • K. Glavina
    • 5
  • J. Mašković
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyZagreb University Hospital RebroZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Department of NeuropathologyZagreb University Hospital RebroZagrebCroatia
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyGeneral Hospital Sveti DuhZagrebCroatia
  4. 4.Zagreb School of MedicineZagrebCroatia
  5. 5.Department of RadiologyClinical HospitalOsijekCroatia
  6. 6.Department of RadiologyClinical HospitalSplitCroatia

Personalised recommendations