Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 21–29 | Cite as

Razabrasion: An alternative approach to perioral rhytides

  • Jeffrey L. Marsh
  • Milton T. Edgerton
Article
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

Persistence of perioral rhytides is a frequent source of patient concern following standard rhytidectomy. Dissatisfaction with the limited results and occasional complications that result from mechanical, manual, and chemical abrasive methods of management prompted application of the steel blade dermal shave technique to this problem. Manual oscillation of a sterile commercial razor blade with depth and width controlled by digital pressure eradicates all but the deepest perioral wrinkles. Eleven patients have undergone “razabrasion” within the past 19 months without complication. Local anesthesia is sufficient. Topographically distant but synchronous facial operations may be performed safely, but undermining of the shaved facial skin should be avoided for 6 months after “razabrasion”. Later results will be studied to define the longevity of the effect, but we are encouraged that the method offers the most gentle, most rapid, and best controlled (as to level of dermal shave) current method of tangential dermal splitting. The paper describes the technique of “razabrasion” of perioral rhytides and reports our early results.

Key words

Face-Surgery Surgery Plastic-Methods-Rhytides-Wrinkles 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ayers, S., III: Dermal changes following application of chemical conterants to aging skin. Arch. Dermatol. 82:578, 1960.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baker, T. J.: Chemical face peeling and rhytidectomy. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 29:199, 1960.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baker, T. J., et al.: Long-term histological study of skin after chemical face peeling. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 53:522, 1974.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bown, A. M., Kaplan, L. M., and Brown, M. E.: Pheno-induced histological skin changes: hazards, techniques and uses. Br. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 13:158, 1960.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoopes, J. E., Wolford, F. G., and Dalton, W. E.: Chemical rhytidectomy. In: F. W. Masters and V. R. Lewis, Jr. (eds);Symposium on Aesthetic Surgery of the Face, Eyelids, and Breast. C. V. Mosby Co., St. Louis, 1972, p. 75.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Iverson, P. C.: Surgical removal of traumatic tattoos of the face. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2:427, 1947.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Iverson, P. C.: Further developments in the treatment of skin lesion by surgical abrasion. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 12:27, 1953.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnson, J. B., and Hadley, R. C.: In: J. Sm. Converse (ed.):Reconstructive Plastic Surgery. W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, 1964, p. 1339.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kromayer E.: Rotationsinstrumente, eine neues technisches Verfahren in der dermatologischen Kleinchirugie. Derm. Ztschr. 12:26, 1905.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Orentreich, N.: Dermabrasion. In: R. Goldwyn (ed.): The Unfavorable Result in Plastic Surgery. Little, Brown & Co., Boston, 1972, p. 413.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rees, T. E., and Wood-Smith, D.: Cosmetic Facial Surgery. W. B. Saunders Co. Philadelphia, 1973, p. 215.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sheehan, J. E., and Swanker, W. A.: Obliteration of scars by shaving. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 6:153, 1950.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Spira, M., Gerow, F. J., and Hardy, S. B.: Complications of face peeling. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 54:397, 1974.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey L. Marsh
    • 1
  • Milton T. Edgerton
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Plastic SurgeryWashington University of School of Medicine, St. Louis Children's HospitalSt. Louis
  2. 2.Department of Plastic SurgeryUniversity of VirginaCharlottesville

Personalised recommendations