Current Microbiology

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 209–215 | Cite as

Transfer of broad-host-range antibiotic resistance plasmids in soil microcosms

  • Gauri A. Naik
  • Lata N. Bhat
  • B. A. Chopade
  • J. M. Lynch


Broad-host-range plasmids, belonging to IncP (RP4 and pUPI102) and IncC (R57.b), were studied for intrageneric and intergeneric gene transfer in three different soil microcosms. RP4 was transferred intragenerically in clay loam, sandy loam, and sandy microcosms at frequencies of 0.71×10−2, 0.83×10−2, and 0.41×10−2 respectively, optimally at 37°C and at 100% vol/wt moisture content. Under similar conditions, R57.b was also transferred at frequencies of 0.38×10−2, 0.58×10−2, and 0.80×10−5 respectively at 30°C. Both RP4 and R57.b were transferred at low frequency at 20°C. Kinetics of plasmid transfer revealed that 48 h was the optimum time for intrageneric conjugal gene transfer. Gene transfer frequency was tenfold higher in all nutrient-amended soil microcosms than in the absence of nutrient amendment. RP4 was transferred to an indigenous soil bacteriumBeijerinckia indica in a nonsterile soil microcosm and to other indigenous soil bacteria, viz.Xanthomonas campestris, Azotobacter chroococcum, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, Achromobacter agili, andRhizobium meliloti in sterile soil microcosms. pUPI102 was transferred fromA. calcoaceticus BD413 toEscherichia coli K12 J53 at a frequency of 0.75×10−6 and 1.1×10−6 in clay loam and sandy loam microcosms respectively. However, no gene transfer was observed in any soil microcosm when strains ofA. calcoaceticus BD413 (pUPI102) andE. coli K12 J53.2 (RP4) were used for conjugal mating. Plasmid RP4 was found to be 100% stable in all the above microorganisms.


Acinetobacter Clay Loam Azotobacter Soil Microcosm Nonsterile Soil 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Bachmann BJ (1972) Pedigrees of some mutant strains ofE. coli K12. Bacterial Rev 36:525–527Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berg G, Trevors JT (1990) Bacterial conjugation betweenE. coli andPseudomonas spp. donor and recipients cells in soil. J Ind Microbiol 5:79–84Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chopade BA (1986) Genetics of antibiotic resistance inAcinetobacter calcoaceticus. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chopade BA, Wise PJ, Towner KJ (1985) Plasmid transfer and behaviour inAcinetobacter calcoaceticus EBF 65/65. J Gen Microbiol 131:2805–2811Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chopade BA, Patwardhan RB, Dhakephalkar PK (1993)Acinetobacter infections in India: genetic and molecular biological studies and some approaches to the problem. In: Proceedings of tropical diseases: molecular biology and control strategies. Lucknow: Central Drug Research Institute, CSIR publications, New Delhi, in pressGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Datta N, Hedges RW (1972) R factors identified in Paris, some conferring gentamycin resistance, constitute a new compatibility group. Ann Microbiol (Paris) 123:849–859Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Datta N, Hedges RW, Shaw EJ, Sykes RB, Richmond MH (1971) Properties of R factors fromPseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 108:1244–1249Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deshpande LM, Kapadnis BP, Chopade BA (1993) Metal resistance inAcinetobacter and its relation to β-lactamase production. BioMetals 6:55–59Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dhakephalkar PK, Murthi S, Seshadri PG, Puntambekar M, Chopade BA (1992) Genetic studies on pUPI102, a plasmid encoding resistance to tetracycline, gentamycin, neomycin and mercury inA. juni ACN4 In: Proceedings of DAE symposium on molecular biology of microorganisms. Bombay: Dept. of Atomic Energy, Govt. of India, pp 72–77Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Juni E (1972) Interspecies transformation ofAcinetobacter: genetic evidence for a ubiquitous genus. J Bacteriol 112:917–931Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kanwar JS (1976) Soil fertility theory and practice. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research [ICAR]Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karasovsky VN, Stotzky G (1987) Conjugation and genetic recombination inE. coli in sterile and non sterile soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 19:631–638Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kinkle BK, Schmidt EL (1991) Transfer of pea symbiotic plasmid pJB5JI in non sterile soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:3264–3269Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Narayana N, Shah C (1966) Physical properties of soils. Bombay: Manaktalas PublishersGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prosser JI, Reid N (1992) A mathematical model of gene transfer on surfaces. Abstracts of 6th International Symposium on Microbial Ecology, Barcelona, p 105Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ramos MI, Gonzalez JM (1991) Conjugation transfer of recombinant DNA in cultures and in soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:3020–3027Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schilf W, Klingmuller W (1983) Experiments withE. coli on the dispersal of plasmids in environmental samples. Recomb DNA Tech Bull 6:101–102Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Scott EM, Van Elsas JD, Bazin MJ, Lynch JM (1992) A mathematical model of gene exchange in a soil environment. Abstracts of 6th International Symposium on Microbial Ecology, Barcelona, p 105Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Silhavy TJ, Berman ML, Erquist LW (1984) In: Experiments with gene fusions. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp 147–148Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smith MS, Thomas GW, White RE, Ritonga D (1985) Transport ofE. coli through intact and disturbed soil columns. J Environ Qual 14:87–91Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stotzky G, Babich H (1986) Survival of and genetic transfer by genetically engineered bacteria in natural environments. Adv Appl Microbiol 12:547–563Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stotzky G, Rem LT (1966) Influence of clay minerals on microorganisms. Can J Microbiol 12:547–633Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sun L, Bazin MJ, Lynch JM (1993) Plasmid dynamics in a model soil column. Mol Ecol 2:9–15Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Taher Khalil A, Gealt MA (1987) Temperature, pH and cations affect the ability ofE. coli to mobilize plasmids in broth and synthetic waste water. Can J Microbiol 33:733–737Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Trevors JT, Barkay T (1987) Gene transfer among bacteria in soil and acquatic environments. Can J Microbiol 33:191–196Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Trevors JT, Berg G (1988) Conjugal RP4 transfer betweenPseudomonas in soil and recovery of RP4 plasmid DNA from soil. Syst Appl Microbiol 11:223–227Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Trevors JT, Oddie KM (1986) R plasmid transfer in soil and water. Can J Microbiol 32:610–613Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Van Elsas JD, Johana M (1987) Transfer of plasmid pFT30 between bacilli in soil as influenced by bacterial population dynamics and soil conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 19:639–647Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weinberg SR, Stotzky G (1972) Conjugation and genetic recombination ofE. coli in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 4:171–180Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gauri A. Naik
    • 1
  • Lata N. Bhat
    • 1
  • B. A. Chopade
    • 1
  • J. M. Lynch
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of MicrobiologyUniversity of PoonaPuneIndia
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK

Personalised recommendations