Advertisement

Overlooked aspects in the education of science professionals: Mentoring, ethics, and professional responsibility

  • Stephanie J. Bird
Article

Abstract

Science as profession is generally defined narrowly as research. Science education as preparation for a profession in research is usually perceived as course work and laboratory training, even though the necessary knowledge and skills to pursue a research career are more extensive and diverse and are learned in one-on-one interaction with mentors. A complete education of science professionals includes the values, ethical standards and conventions of the discipline since they are fundamental to the profession. Mentoring and education in the responsible conduct and reporting of research and in the ethical dimensions of science are among the professional responsibilities of scientists and need to be discussed as part of science education. Moreover, science as an enterprise is much more than research and includes a number of other components, including science teaching, science journalism, and science policy. Each of these contributes to the nature of science and its role in society.

Key Words

mentoring professional responsibility science education 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bird, S. J., and Didion, C. J. (1993). Retaining women science studients: A mentoring project of the Association for Women in Science.The Initiatives: The Journal of the National Association for Women in Education 55(2):368–376.Google Scholar
  2. CBE Style Manual Committee. (1983). Ethical conduct in authorship and publication. InCBE Style Manual, 5th ed., Council of Biological Education, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
  3. Croll, R. P. (1984). The noncontributing author: An issue of credit and responsibility.Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 27(3):401–407.Google Scholar
  4. Djerassi, C. (1991). Mentoring: A cure for science bashing?Chemical and Engineering News 60: 30–33.Google Scholar
  5. Faddis, B., Ruzicka, P., Bernard, B. and Nuppertz, N. (1988).Hand in Hand: Mentoring Young Women, Women's Educational Equity Act, Newton, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  6. Fort, D. C., Bird, S. J., and Didion, C. J. (1993).A Hand Up: Women Mentoring Women in Science, Association for Women in Science, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  7. Hall, R. M., and Sandler, B. R. (1983).Academic Mentoring for Women Students and Faculty: A New Look at an Old Way to get Ahead. Association of American Colleges, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  8. Jackson, I. (1986).Honor in Science, Sigma Xi, New Haven.Google Scholar
  9. Kram, K. E. (1988).Mentoring at Work, University Press of America, Inc., Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
  10. Marsa, L. (1991). Mentoring: A time-honored tradition changes over time.The Scientist 5(20): 19–20.Google Scholar
  11. Mervis, J. (1992). Radcliffe president lambastes competitiveness in research.The Scientist 6(2): 1.Google Scholar
  12. National Academy of Sciences Committee on the Conduct of Science. (1989).On Being a Scientist, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  13. Panel on Scientific Responsibility in the Conduct of Research, Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy, National Academy of Sciences/National Academy of Engineering/ Institute of medicine. (1992).Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  14. Task Force on Women, Minorities, and the Handicapped in Science and Technology. (1988).Changing America: The New Face of Science and Engineering. Interim Report. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  15. Task Force on Women, Minorities, and the Handicapped in Science and Technology. (1989).Changing America: The New Face of Science and Engineering, Final Report. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  16. U.S. Department of Labor. (1989)Women in Non-Traditional Careers. Women's Bureau, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  17. Wellesley College Center for Research on Women. (1992).The AAUW Report: How Schools Shortchange Girls, American Association of University Women Educational Foundation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie J. Bird
    • 1
  1. 1.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridge

Personalised recommendations