Advertisement

Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology

, Volume 104, Issue 4, pp 407–423 | Cite as

Chemical interdiffusion of dacite and rhyolite: anhydrous measurements at 1 atm and 10 kbar, application of transition state theory, and diffusion in zoned magma chambers

  • Don R. Baker
Article

Abstract

Chemical diffusivity measurements have been made on anhydrous metaluminous diffusion couples of dacite and rhyolite at 1 atm, 1200°–1400° C, and 10 kbar, 1300°–1600° C, and on anhydrous peraluminous and peralkaline dacite-rhyolite diffusion couples at 10 kbar, 1300°–1600° C. Chemical diffusivities for Si, Al, Fe, Mg, and Ca were measured in all experiments on the metaluminous diffusion couples using Boltzmann-Matano analysis, and Si diffusivities were measured on the other diffusion couples. Two 10 kbar metaluminous experiments were analyzed with the X-ray microprobe and diffusivities of Sr, Y, Zr and Nb were measured. Si diffusivity displays a weak negative correlation with SiO2 content over the range of 65%–75% SiO2. At a given SiO2 content chemical diffusivities of all non-alkali elements are usually within less than an order of magnitude of Si chemical diffusivity and are controlled by partitioning along the diffusion profile so as to maintain local equilibrium at each point along the profile. Alkali chemical diffusivities were not measured but can be estimated from the experiments to be orders of magnitude higher than non-alkali chemical diffusivities. Data were fit to Arrhenius equations for diffusivities measured at 65, 70 and 75% SiO2. At 1 atm the Arrhenius equation for non-alkalies at 70% SiO2 in the metaluminous system is:
$$D_T = 72.5\exp \left( { - 82.5 kcal/RT} \right)$$
an at 10 kbar:
$$D_T = 0.0673\exp \left( { - 56.5 kcal/RT} \right)$$
whereD T is the diffusivity in cm2/s,R is in calories, andT is in Kelvin. At 65 and 75% SiO2 the pre-exponential factors and activation energies are similar to the values determined at 70% SiO2. Results on the metaluminous system demonstrate that the effect of increasing pressure is to increase the diffusivity at constant temperature, by about a factor of 4 at 1300° C, less at higher temperatures. Ten kbar activation energies and pre-exponential factors for peraluminous and peralkaline systems are slightly smaller than for the metaluminous system and reflect the slightly higher diffusivities in the peraluminous and peralkaline systems consistent with their lower calculated viscosities when compared to the metaluminous system. 1-atm diffusivities can be calculated from melt viscosities using the Eyring equation to within a factor of 5, except for 75% SiO2 diffusivities which consistently display calculated diffusivities approximately an order of magnitude below measured diffusivities. Using fundamental equations of transition state theory the 1-atm chemical diffusivities of non-alkalies, and alkalies too, can be calculated from thermodynamic data and melt structure models. There are, however, discrepancies in the calculated and measured activation energies and pre-exponential factors. Application of diffusivity measurements to magma chamber processes demonstrates that diffusion is not an effective process for compositional modification and can only begin to have a significant effect on melt compositions if the dacitic and rhyolitic melts are convecting separately and separated by a thin, static zone where diffusive transport is occurring; even in this case diffusion is likely to modify alkali concentrations only, and perhaps isotopic ratios in small magma chambers, or chambers with large aspect ratios (width/height). If the dacitic melt forms enclaves which are mixed into the rhyolitic melt, then diffusion coupled with the physical mixing of enclaves has the potential to rapidly affect alkali and isotopic ratios of the rhyolite melt and dacitic enclaves. Non-alkali concentrations in both dacite enclaves and rhyolite are, however, unlikely to be significantly affected. Because of the ineffectiveness of diffusion, once a magma chamber becomes zoned in major and trace elments it will remain zoned, with the exception of alkalies and possibly isotopic ratios, unless physical mixing between the different compositions occurs.

Keywords

Isotopic Ratio Magma Chamber Diffusion Couple Arrhenius Equation SiO2 Content 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson DE (1981) Diffusion in electrolyte mixtures. In: Lasaga AC, Kirkpatrick RJ (eds) Kinetics of geochemical processes. Rev Mineral 8, Mineral Soc Am, Washington DC, pp 135–170Google Scholar
  2. Angell CA, Cheeseman PA, Tamaddon S (1983) Water-like transport property anomalies in liquid silicates investigated at high T and P by computer simulation techniques. Bull Mineral 106:87–97Google Scholar
  3. Baker DR (1989) Tracer versus trace element diffusion: Diffusional decoupling of Sr concentration from Sr isotope composition. Geochim Cosmichim Acta 53:3015–3023Google Scholar
  4. Baker DR, Watson EB (1988) Diffusion of major and trace elements in compositionally complex Cl- and F-bearing silicate melts. J Non-Cryst Solids 102:62–70Google Scholar
  5. Bence AE, Albee AL (1968) Empirical correction factors for the electron microanalysis of silicates and oxides. J Geol 76:382–403Google Scholar
  6. Bowen NL (1921) Diffusion in silicate melts. J Geol 29:295–317Google Scholar
  7. Clark S, Spera FJ, Yuen DA (1987) Steady state double-diffusive convection in magma chambers heated from below. In: Mysen BO (ed) Magmatic processes: physicochemical principles. Geochem Soc Spec Publ, University Park Pennsylvania 1:289–306Google Scholar
  8. Cooper AR (1968) The use and limitations of the concept of an effective binary diffusion coefficient for multi-component diffusion. In: Wachtman JB Jr, Franklin AD (ed) Mass transport in oxides. Nat Bureau of Standards Spec Pub 296, pp 79–84Google Scholar
  9. Crank J (1975) The mathematics of diffusion. Clarendon Press, Oxford, p 414Google Scholar
  10. Faure G (1986) Principles of isotope geology. Wiley, New York, p 589Google Scholar
  11. Furlong KP, Myers JD (1985) Thermal-mechanical modeling of the role of thermal stresses and stoping in magma contamination. J Volcan Geotherm Res 24:179–191Google Scholar
  12. Glasstone S, Laidler K, Eyring H (1941) The theory of rate processes. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 600Google Scholar
  13. Hanada T, Aikawa T, Soga N (1982) Coordination of aluminum in amorphous sodium aluminosilicate films. J Non-Cryst Solids 50:397–405Google Scholar
  14. Hall LT (1953) An analytical method of calculating variable diffusion coefficients. J Chem Phys 21:87–89Google Scholar
  15. Harrison TM, Watson EB (1983) Kinetics of zircon dissolution and zirconium diffusion in granitic melts of variable water content. Contrib Mineral Petrol 84:66–72Google Scholar
  16. Henderson P, Nolan J, Cunningham GC, Lowry RK (1985) Structural controls and mechanisms of diffusion in natural silicate melts. Contrib Mineral Petrol 89:263–272Google Scholar
  17. Hildreth W (1981) Gradients in silicic magma chambers: Implications for lithospheric magmatism. J Geophys Res B86:10, 153–10, 192Google Scholar
  18. Hirshfelder J (1939) The structure of liquids. J Chem Ed 16:540–544Google Scholar
  19. Hochella MF, Brown GE Jr (1984) Structure and viscosity of rhyolite composition melt. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 48:2631–2640Google Scholar
  20. Hochella MF, Brown GE Jr (1985) The structures of albite and jadeite composition glasses quenched from high pressure. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 49:1137–1142Google Scholar
  21. Hofmann AW (1980) Diffusion in natural silicate melts: a critical review. In: Hargraves RB (ed) Physics of magmatic processes. Princeton Univ Press, New Jersey, pp 385–417Google Scholar
  22. Hofmann AW, Brown L (1976) Diffusion measurements using fast deuterons for in situ production of radioactive tracers. Carnegie Inst Washington Yearb 75:259–262Google Scholar
  23. Jambon A (1982) Tracer diffusion in granitic melts: experimental results for Na, K, Rb, Cs, Ca, Sr, Ba, Ce, Eu to 1300° C and a model for calculation. J Geophys Res B87:10, 797–10, 810Google Scholar
  24. Jarosewich E, Nelen JA, Norberg JA (1977) Electron microprobe reference samples for mineral analysis. Smithson Contrib Earth Sci 22:68–72Google Scholar
  25. Jones KW, Gordon BM, Hanson AL, Hastings JB, Howells MR, Kraner HW, Chen JR (1984) Application of synchrotron radiation to elemental analysis. Nucl Instrum Meth 231:225–231Google Scholar
  26. Kushiro I (1978) Viscosity and structural changes of albite (NaAlSi3O8) melts at high pressures. Earth Planet Sci Lett 41:87–90Google Scholar
  27. Kushiro I (1983) Effect of pressure on the diffusivity of network-forming cations in melts of jadeitic composition. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 47:1415–1422Google Scholar
  28. Kushiro I, Yoder HS Jr, Mysen BO (1976) Viscosities of basalt and andesite melts at high pressures. J Geophys Res 81:6351–6356Google Scholar
  29. Lacy ED (1963) Aluminum in glasses and in melts. Phys Chem Glasses 4:234–238Google Scholar
  30. Liu SB, Pines A, Brandriss M, Stebbins JF (1987) Relaxation mechanisms and effects of motion in albilte (NaAlSi3O8) liquid and glass: a high temperature NMR study. Phys Chem Minerals 15:155–162Google Scholar
  31. Liu SB, Stebbins JF, Schneider E, Pines A (1988) Diffusive motion in alkali silicate melts: An NMR study at high temperature. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 52:527–538Google Scholar
  32. Magaritz M, Hofmann AW (1978) Diffusion of Sr, Ba and Na in obsidian. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 42:595–605Google Scholar
  33. McKeown DA, Galeener FL, Brown GE Jr (1984) Raman studies of Al coordination in silica-rich sodium aluminosilicate glasses and some related minerals. J Non-Cryst Solids 68:361–378Google Scholar
  34. McKeown DA, Waychunas GA, Brown GE Jr (1985a) EXAFS and XANES study of the local coordination environment of sodium in a series of silica-rich glasses and selected minerals with the Na2O−Al2O3−SiO2 system. J Non-Cryst Solids 74:325–348Google Scholar
  35. McKeown DA, Waychunas GA, Brown GE Jr (1985b) EXAFS study of the coordination environment of aluminum in a series of silica-rich glasses and selected minerals with the Na2O−Al2O3−SiO2 system. J Non-Cryst Solids 74:349–371Google Scholar
  36. Muncill GE, Lasaga AC (1987) Crystal-growth kinetics of plagioclase in igneous systems: One-atmosphere experiments and application of a simplified growth model. Am Mineral 72:299–311Google Scholar
  37. Mysen BO, Virgo D, Danckwerth P, Seifert FA, Kushiro I (1983) Influence of pressure on the structure of melts on the joins NaAlO2−SiO2, CaAl2O4−SiO2, and MgAl2O4−SiO2. Neues Jahrb Mineral Abh 147:281–303Google Scholar
  38. Navrotsky A, Hon R, Weill DF, Henry DJ (1980) Thermochemistry of glasses and liquids in the systems CaMgSi2O6−CaAl2Si2O8−NaAlSi3O8, SiO2−CaAl2Si2O8 and SiO2−Al2O3−Na2O. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 44:1409–1423Google Scholar
  39. Navrotsky A, Geisinger KL, McMillan P, Gibbs GV (1985) The tetrahedral framework in glasses and melts-inferences from molecular orbital calculations and implications for structure, thermodynamics, and physical properties. Phys Chem Mineral 11:284–298Google Scholar
  40. Oestrike R, Yang W-H, Kirkpatrick RJ, Hervig RL, Navrotsky A, Montez B (1987) High-resolution23Na,27Al, and29Si NMR spectroscopy of framework aluminosilicate glasses. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 51:2199–2209Google Scholar
  41. Onorato PIK, Alexander MN, Struck CW, Tasker GW, Uhlmann DR (1985) Bridging and nonbridging oxygen atoms in alkali aluminosilicate glasses. J Am Ceram Soc 68:C148–150Google Scholar
  42. Riebling EF (1966) Structure of sodium aluminosilicate melts containing at least 50 mole % SiO2 at 1500° C. J Chem Phys 44:2857–2865Google Scholar
  43. Risbud SH, Kirkpatrick RJ, Taglialavore AP, Montez B (1987) Solid-state NMR evidence of 4-, 5-, and 6-fold aluminum sites in roller-quenched SiO2−Al2O3 glasses. J Am Ceram Soc 70:C10–12Google Scholar
  44. Robie RA, Hemingway BS, Fisher JR (1978) Thermodynamic properties of minerals and related substances at 298 15 K and 1 bar (105 Pascals) pressure and higher tempertures. US Geol Surv Bull 1452, p 456Google Scholar
  45. Ryerson FJ, Hess PC (1978) Implications of liquid-liquid distribution coefficients to mineral-liquid partitioning. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 42:921–932Google Scholar
  46. Scarfe CM, Mysen BO, Virgo D (1987) Pressure dependence of viscosity of silicate melts. In: Mysen BO (ed) Magmatic processes: physicochemical principles. Geochem Soc Spec Publ, University Park Pennsylvania 1:59–68Google Scholar
  47. Seifert F, Mysen BO, Virgo D (1982) Three-dimensional network structure of quenched melts (glass) in the systems SiO2−NaAlO2, SiO2−CaAl2O4, and SiO2−MgAl2O4. Am Mineral 67:696–717Google Scholar
  48. Shaw HR (1972) Viscosities of magmatic silicate liquids: An empirical method of prediction. Am J Sci 272:870–893Google Scholar
  49. Shimizu N, Kushiro I (1984) Diffusivity of oxygen in jadeite and diopside melts at high pressure. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 48:1295–1303Google Scholar
  50. Smith HD (1974) An experimental study of the diffusion of Na, K, and Rb in magmatic silicate liquids. PhD dissertation, University of OregonGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith RL (1979) Ash flow magmatism. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 180:5–27Google Scholar
  52. Stull DR, Prophet H (1971) JANAF thermochemical tables. Nat Standard Ref Data Ser, US Natl Bur Standards 38, p 1141Google Scholar
  53. Sutton SR, Delaney JS, Smith JV, Prinz M (1987) Copper and nickel partitioning in iron meteorites. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 51:2653–2662Google Scholar
  54. Taylor M, Brown GE Jr (1979a) Structure of mineral glasses-I. The feldspar glasses NaAlSi3O8, KAlSi3O8, and CaAl2Si2O8. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 43:61–75Google Scholar
  55. Taylor M, Brown GE Jr (1979b) Structure of mineral glasses-II. The SiO2−NaAlSiO4 join. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 43:1467–1473Google Scholar
  56. Watson EB (1976) Two-liquid partition coefficients: experimental data and geochemical implications. Contrib Mineral Petrol 56:119–134Google Scholar
  57. Watson EB (1979) Calcium diffusion in a simple silicate melt to 30 kbar. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 43:313–322Google Scholar
  58. Watson EB (1981) Diffusion in magmas at depth in the earth: The effects of pressure and dissolved H2O. Earth Planet Sci Let 52:291–301Google Scholar
  59. Watson EB (1982) Basalt contamination by continental crust: Some experiments and models. Contrib Mineral Petrol 80:73–87Google Scholar
  60. Watson EB, Baker DR (1990) Chemical diffusion in magmas: an overview of experimental results and geochemical implications. In: Kushiro I, Perchuk L (eds) Advances in physical geochemistry. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, vol 6 (in press)Google Scholar
  61. Waychunas GA, Brown GE Jr, Ponader CW, Jackson WE (1988) Evidence from X-ray absorption for network-forming Fe2+ in molten alkali silicates. Nature 332:251–253Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Don R. Baker
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geology and Center for Glass Science and TechnologyRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA

Personalised recommendations