Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 225–230 | Cite as

Conclusions after 122 revision rhinoplasties: Brief review of cases

  • Robert M. Lovas
Article
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

Revision rhinoplasty is always more complicated than the primary surgery. A more conservative approach using safer, more reliable techniques in primary surgery should decrease the number of revisions.

Key words

Rhinoplasty revision rhinoplasty 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dingman RE, Walter C: Use of composite ear graft in correction of the short nose. Plast Reconstr Surg43:117, 1969PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lovas RM: Secondary Rhinoplasties—One year's Study. Aesth Plastic Surg5:361–368, 1981Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peck G: Unfavorable results in rhinoplasty, in Unfavorable results in plastic Surgery II. (Boston: Little Brown, 1984).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rogers BO: in Mill R (ed.) Symposium on Corrective Rhinoplasty. St. Louis: Mosby, 1976.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sheen J: Aesthetic Rhinoplasty. St. Louis: Mosby, 1978.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tardy E: Personal communications, Würzburg, 1980.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zoltan J: Personal communications, Budapest, 1967–1969Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert M. Lovas
    • 1
  1. 1.Munich 90West Germany

Personalised recommendations