Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 123–135 | Cite as

A comparative histologic study of the effects of three peeling agents and dermabrasion on normal and sundamaged skin

  • Samuel J. Stegman
Article

Abstract

This paper reports the histologic findings in normal and sundamaged skin, created by 60% trichloroacetic acid (TCA), 100% phenol, Baker's phenol mixture, and dermabrasion at 3 days and 60 days after treatment. Half of the peeled areas were unoccluded, and the other half were occluded. It was found that the various escharotic agents seem to wound sundamaged skin with the same type of graduation as non-sundamaged skin. Furthermore, a layer of enlarged papillary dermis consistently developed, the thickness of which seems directly related to the strength of the escharotic agent, or the overall wound depth or the healing time necessary for complete recovery.

Key words

Dermabrasion Escharotic agents Sundamaged skin 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ayres S III, Wilson JW, Luikart R II: Dermal changes following abrasion. Arch Dermatol79:553, 1959Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ayres S III: Dermal changes following application of chemical cauterants to aging skin: Superficial chemosurgery. Arch Dermatol82:578, 1960PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baker RJ, Gordon HL: Chemical face peeling and dermabrasion: Symposium on cosmetic surgery. Surg Clin North Am51:387, 1971PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baker TJ, Gordon HL, Mosienko P, Seckinger DL: Long-term histological study of skin after chemical face peeling. Plast Reconstr Surg53:522, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Behin F, Feuerstein SS, Marovitz WF: Comparative histological study of mini pig skin after chemical peel and dermabrasion. Arch Otolaryngol103:271, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhangoo KS: Letters to the Editor: Histological changes following chemical face peeling. Plast Reconstr Surg53:599, 1974Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Braverman IM, Fonferko E: Studies in Cutaneous Agin: I. The Elastic Fiber Network. J Invest Dermatol78:434–443, 1982PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brown AM, Kaplan LM, Brown ME: Cutaneous alterations induced by phenol: A histologic bio-assay. Int Surg34:602, 1960Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Litton C: Chemical face lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg29:371, 1962PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Litton C, Trinidad G: Complications of chemical face peeling as evaluated by a questionnaire. Plast Reconstr Surg67:738, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Spira M, Dahl C, Freeman R, Gerow FJ, Hardy SB: Chemosurgery: A histological study. Plast Reconstr Surg45:247, 1970PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stegman SJ: A study of dermabrasion and chemical peels in an animal model. J Dermatol Surg Oncol6:490, 1980PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel J. Stegman
    • 1
  1. 1.San FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations