High tibial osteotomy alone or combined with ligament reconstruction in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees

  • Chr. Lattermann
  • R. P. Jakob
Knee Injuries


High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is widely accepted as a treatment option in patients with medial unicompartimental osteoarthritis (OA) and varus morphotype of the knee. We increasingly see younger patients with a chronic anterior instability, an additional varus morphotype and beginning medial OA. Treatment options for these patients are not clear up to now. In this clinical study we compare for the first time three different treatment rationales and introduce a concept of symptom-oriented surgery in young patients with medial OA and chronic anterior instability.Materials/methods: Between 1984 and 1994 30 patients were treated with a medial unicompartimental OA and chronic anterior instability of the knee. Patients were grouped into three different groups according to treatment. 1) only HTO was performed. 2) HTO and simultaneously an ACL-reconstruction and 3) HTO and 6–12 months later an ACL-reconstruction was performed. 27/30 patients were available for follow-up. All patients had an arthroscopy before surgery. Evaluation was done according to the IKDC-protocol and X-ray documentation.Results: Pain was a major problem in all patients. None of them was completely pain-free. 8/27 patients had pain even with light activities. This included 1/11 patients of group 1, 3/8 of group 2 and 4/8 of group 3. 9/27 patients had stable knee joints with a Lachman-test of 3–5 mm. No patient had a Lachman test<3 mm. 3/11 patients of group 1, 3/8 of group 2 and 2/8 of group 3 had a Lachman test of 5–10 mm. A positive pivot-shift could be found in 9/27 patients. 2/11 of group 1, 4/8 in group 2 and 3/8 in group 3. The overall IKDC-score improved in 23/27 patients, one patient remained unchanged, two deteriorated. Radiologically a slight progression of OA could be seen in all patients. Radiological signs of OA and pain did not show any correlation. There was, however, a significant rate of postoperative complications involving 4/11 patients of group 1 and 3/8 of group 3. There were 6 major complications in 5/8 patients in group 2. Nevertheless overall patient satisfaction was high. 25/27 patients would undergo the procedure again.Conclusion: HTO is a good treatment option for younger patients with medial OA and chronic anterior instability of the knee. These patients pose a high challenge to diagnostic and operative skills of the surgeon. Main symptoms of these patients have to be analysed clearly in terms of instability and pain. In patients aged 40 and older an HTO alone is an excellent treatment option with reproducably good results. In younger patients we advise an HTO first. If instability persists, an ACL-reconstruction can be done 6–12 months later. One has to be aware that a simultaneous combined procedure has a significant complication rate. Hence if a simultaneous combined treatment is planned the surroundings including surgical technique, rehabilitation and patient compliance have to be ideal. These young patients need an activity counselling in order to realise that their knee joint has suffered significantly from the injury and ongoing high physical demands on their knee joint.

Key words

Knee Knee ligament surgery Osteoarthritis Anterior cruciate ligament Anterior instability High tibial osteotomy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Aglietti P, Rinonapoli E, Stringa G, Taviani A (1983) Tibial osteotomy for the varus osteoarthritic knee. Clin Orthop 176:239–251Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bauer GC, Insall J, Koshino T (1969) Tibial osteotomy in gonarthrosis (osteoarthritis of the knee). J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 51:1545–1563Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boss A, Stutz G, Gächter A (1995) Kombinierte VKB-Plastik und Tibiavalgisationsosteotomie [Abstract]. Kongressband der SGO 1995 in Geneva 39Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Broughton NS, Newman JH, Baily RJ (1986) Unicompartmental replacement and high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. A comparative study after 5–10 years follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 68: 447–452Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brueckmann FR, Kettelkamp DB (1982) Proximal tibial osteotomy. Orthop Clin North Am 13:3–16Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cass JR, Bryan RS (1988) High tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop 230:196–199Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coventry MB (1965) Osteotomy of the upper portion of the tibia for degenerative arthritis of the knee. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 47:984–990Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coventry MB (1973) Osteotomy about the knee for degenerative and rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 55:23–48Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coventry MB (1979) Uper tibial osteotomy for gonarthrosis. The evolution of the operations in the last 18 years and long term results. Orthop Clin North Am 10:191–210Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daniel DM, Stone ML, Dobson BE, Fithian DC, Rossman DJ, Kaufman KR (1994) Fate of the ACL-injured patient. A prospective outcome study. Am J Sponts Med 22:632–644Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dejour H, Neyret P, Boileau P, Donell S (1994) Anterior cruciate reconstruction combined with valgus tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop 299:220Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dejour H, Neyret P, Bonnin M, Fu F, Harner CD (eds) (1994) Knee surgery, Vol. 42. Instability and osteoarthritis. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 859–875Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dejour H, Walch G, Deschamps G, Chambat P (1987) Arthrose du genou sur laxité chronique antérieur. Rev Chir Orthop 73:157–170Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    DeLee JC (1996) Instability in the middle aged arthritic knee [Abstract]. AAOS, Atlanta, Feb 1996Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fulham O'Neill D, James SL (1992) Valgus osteotomy with anterior cruciate laxity. Clin Orthop 278:153–159Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Giger P, Bereiter H, Gächter A (1987) Vorderer Kreuzbandersatz mit Tibiavalgisationsosteotomie kombiniert bei beginnender medialer Gonarthrose mit vorderer Kreuzbandinsuffizienz. Z Orthop 125:68–71Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hernigou P, Medeviell D, Debeyre J, Goutallier D (1987) Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity. A ten- to thirteen year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 69:332–354Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holden DL, James SL, Larson RL, Solcum DB (1988) Proximal tibial osteotomy in patients who are fifty years old or less. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 70: 977–982Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Insall J, Shoji H, Mayer V (1974) High tibial osteotomy. A five year evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg 56:1397–1405Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Insall JN, Joseph DM, Msika C (1984) High tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 66:1040–1048Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ivarsson I, Myrnerts R, Gillquist J (1990) High tibial osteotomy for medial arthritis of the knee A 5 to 7 and a 11 to 13 year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 72:238–244Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lequesne M (1982) Clinical features, diagnostic criteria, functional assessments and radiological classifications of osteoarthritis (excluding the spine). Baillieres Clin Rheumatol 7:1–10Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lerat JL, Moyen B, Garin C, Mandrino A, Besse JL, Brunet-Guedj E (1993) laxité antérieur et arthrose interne du genou. Resultat de la reconstruction du ligament croisé antérieur associée à une ostéotomie tibiale. Rev Chir Orthop 79:365–374Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marquet P (1985) The treatment of choice in osteoarthritis of the knee. Clin Orthop 192:108–112Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Morrey BF (1989) Upper tibial osteotomy for secondary osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 71: 554–559Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Neuschwander DC, Drez D Jr, Paine RM (1993) Simultaneous high tibial osteotomy and ACL reconstruction for combined genu varum and symptomatic ACL tear. Orthopedics 16:679–684Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Noyes FR, Barber SD (1993) High tibial osteotomy and ligament reconstruction in varus angulated, anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees. AJSM 21:2–12Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Odenbring S, Tjornstrand B, Egund N, Hagstedt B, Hovelius L, Lindstrand A, Luxhoj T, Svanstrom A (1989) Function after tibial osieotomy for medial gonarthrosis below age 50 years. Acta Orthop Scand 60:527–531Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shelbourne DK, Wilekens JH (1993) Anterior cruciate ligament intraarticular reconstruction in the symptomatic arthritic knee. AJSM 21:685–690Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chr. Lattermann
    • 1
    • 2
  • R. P. Jakob
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Orthopaedic Department, InselspitalUniversity HospitalBerneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Trauma DepartmentHannover Medical SchoolHannoverGermany
  3. 3.Service de Chirurgie OrthopédiqueHopital cantonalFribourgSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations