QCD at finite temperature—a variational approach

  • A. Mishra
  • H. Mishra
  • S. P. Misra
  • S. N. Nayak
Article

Abstract

We develop here a nonperturbative framework to study quantum chromodynamics (QCD) at finite temperatures using the thermofield dynamics (TFD) method of Umezawa. The methodology considered here is selfconsistent and variational. There is a dynamical generation of a magnetic gluon mass. This eliminates the infrared problems associated with perturbative QCD calculations at finite temperatures. We obtain here the thermodynamical quantities like free energy density, pressure and entropy density. We also calculate the temperature dependence of SVZ parameter\(\frac{{\alpha _s }}{\pi }\left\langle {G_{\mu v}^a G^{a\mu v} } \right\rangle \). The condensate vanishes at the critical temperature in accordance with recent hot sum rule calculations. The present method gives an insight to the vacuum structure in QCD at zero temperature as well as at finite temperatures in a coordinated manner.

Keywords

Critical Temperature Thermodynamical Quantity Finite Temperature Entropy Density Dynamical Generation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G.K. Savvidy: Phys. Lett. 71B (1977) 133; S.G. Matinyan, G.K. Savvidy: Nucl. Phys. B134 (1978) 539; N.K. Nielsen, P. Olesen: Nucl. Phys. B144 (1978) 376; T.H. Hansson, K. Johnson, C. Peterson: Phys. Rev. D26 (1982) 2069Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Mishra, H. Mishra, S.P. Misra, S.N. Nayak: Pramana (J. Phys.) 37 (1991) 59Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein, V.I. Zakharov: Nucl. Phys. B147 (1979) 385, 448, 519; R.A. Bertlmann: Acta Phys. Austriaca 53 (1981) 305Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Umezawa, H. Matsumoto, M. Tachiki: Thermofield dynamics and condensed states: Amsterdam: North Holland 1982Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Linde: Phys. Lett. B 96 (1980) 183Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Anishetty: J. Phys. G10 (1984) 439; V.M. Belyaev, V.L. Eletsky: Z. Phys. C—Particles and Fields 45 (1990) 355; V.M. Belyaev: Phys. Lett B241 (1990) 91Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. Braaten, R.D. Pisarski: Nucl. Phys. A 512 (1990) 569; Nucl. Phys. B 337 (1990) 569Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Polyakov: Nucl. Phys. B 120 (1977) 429; J. Polonyi: Nucl. Phys. A 461 (1987) 279cGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Nadkarni: Phys. Rev. D 33 (1986): 3738; Phys. Rev. D 34 (1986) 3904Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Mishra, S.P. Misra, A. Mishra: Int. J. Mod. Phys. A3 (1988) 2331; S.P. Misra: Phys. Rev. D 35 (1987) 2607Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.M. Cornwall: Phys. Rev. D26 (1982) 1453; J.E. Mandula, M. Ogilvie: Phys. Lett. 185 B (1987) 127Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Mishra, H. Mishra, S.P. Misra, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 7 (1990) 3391; P.K. Panda, R. Sahu, S.P. Misra: Phys. Rev. C 45 (1992) 2079; H. Mishra, S.P. Misra, P.K. Panda, B.K. Parida: Int. J. Mod. Phys. E (to appear)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Mishra, H. Mishra, S.P. Misra, S.N. Nayak: Phys. Rev. D44 (1991) 110Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Schwinger: Phys. Rev. 125 (1962) 1043; ibid J. Schwinger: Phys. Rev., (1962) 127, 324; E.S. Abers, B.W. Lee: Phys. Rep. 9C (1973) 1Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Schutte: Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 810Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    F. Karsh: Particle World 1 (1989) 24Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    C.A. Dominguez, M. Loewe: Z. Phys. C—Particles Fields 51 (1991) 1Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. Gerber, H. Leutwyler: Nucl. Phys. B 321 (1989) 387Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J.E. Mandula, M. Ogilvie: in: Variational calculations in quantum field theory. L. Polley, D.E.L. Pottinger. (eds.) Singapore: World Scientific 1988Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. Engels et al., Bielefeld Preprint BI-TP 29/90, (1990); H. Satz: in: Proceedings of Large Hadron Collider Workshop, Vol I, G. Jarlskog, D. Rein, (eds.) CERN, 90-10, ECFA 90-133 (1990)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    T. Celik, J. Engels, H. Satz: Phys. Lett. B 129 (1983) 323Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    See for example in: A. L. Fetter, J.D. Walecka: Quantum theory of many particle systems. New York: McGraw Hill 1971Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Such an apparent paradox of confinement with massive gluons has been considered in e.g.: J.M. Cornwall: Phys. Rev. D26 (1982) 1453Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    S. Nadkarni: Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) 491Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Mishra
    • 1
  • H. Mishra
    • 2
  • S. P. Misra
    • 2
  • S. N. Nayak
    • 2
  1. 1.Physics DepartmentUtkal UniversityBhubaneswarIndia
  2. 2.Institute of PhysicsBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations