QCD at finite temperature—a variational approach
- 36 Downloads
- 5 Citations
Abstract
We develop here a nonperturbative framework to study quantum chromodynamics (QCD) at finite temperatures using the thermofield dynamics (TFD) method of Umezawa. The methodology considered here is selfconsistent and variational. There is a dynamical generation of a magnetic gluon mass. This eliminates the infrared problems associated with perturbative QCD calculations at finite temperatures. We obtain here the thermodynamical quantities like free energy density, pressure and entropy density. We also calculate the temperature dependence of SVZ parameter\(\frac{{\alpha _s }}{\pi }\left\langle {G_{\mu v}^a G^{a\mu v} } \right\rangle \). The condensate vanishes at the critical temperature in accordance with recent hot sum rule calculations. The present method gives an insight to the vacuum structure in QCD at zero temperature as well as at finite temperatures in a coordinated manner.
Keywords
Critical Temperature Thermodynamical Quantity Finite Temperature Entropy Density Dynamical GenerationPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.G.K. Savvidy: Phys. Lett. 71B (1977) 133; S.G. Matinyan, G.K. Savvidy: Nucl. Phys. B134 (1978) 539; N.K. Nielsen, P. Olesen: Nucl. Phys. B144 (1978) 376; T.H. Hansson, K. Johnson, C. Peterson: Phys. Rev. D26 (1982) 2069Google Scholar
- 2.A. Mishra, H. Mishra, S.P. Misra, S.N. Nayak: Pramana (J. Phys.) 37 (1991) 59Google Scholar
- 3.M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein, V.I. Zakharov: Nucl. Phys. B147 (1979) 385, 448, 519; R.A. Bertlmann: Acta Phys. Austriaca 53 (1981) 305Google Scholar
- 4.H. Umezawa, H. Matsumoto, M. Tachiki: Thermofield dynamics and condensed states: Amsterdam: North Holland 1982Google Scholar
- 5.A. Linde: Phys. Lett. B 96 (1980) 183Google Scholar
- 6.R. Anishetty: J. Phys. G10 (1984) 439; V.M. Belyaev, V.L. Eletsky: Z. Phys. C—Particles and Fields 45 (1990) 355; V.M. Belyaev: Phys. Lett B241 (1990) 91Google Scholar
- 7.E. Braaten, R.D. Pisarski: Nucl. Phys. A 512 (1990) 569; Nucl. Phys. B 337 (1990) 569Google Scholar
- 8.Polyakov: Nucl. Phys. B 120 (1977) 429; J. Polonyi: Nucl. Phys. A 461 (1987) 279cGoogle Scholar
- 9.S. Nadkarni: Phys. Rev. D 33 (1986): 3738; Phys. Rev. D 34 (1986) 3904Google Scholar
- 10.H. Mishra, S.P. Misra, A. Mishra: Int. J. Mod. Phys. A3 (1988) 2331; S.P. Misra: Phys. Rev. D 35 (1987) 2607Google Scholar
- 11.J.M. Cornwall: Phys. Rev. D26 (1982) 1453; J.E. Mandula, M. Ogilvie: Phys. Lett. 185 B (1987) 127Google Scholar
- 12.A. Mishra, H. Mishra, S.P. Misra, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 7 (1990) 3391; P.K. Panda, R. Sahu, S.P. Misra: Phys. Rev. C 45 (1992) 2079; H. Mishra, S.P. Misra, P.K. Panda, B.K. Parida: Int. J. Mod. Phys. E (to appear)Google Scholar
- 13.A. Mishra, H. Mishra, S.P. Misra, S.N. Nayak: Phys. Rev. D44 (1991) 110Google Scholar
- 14.J. Schwinger: Phys. Rev. 125 (1962) 1043; ibid J. Schwinger: Phys. Rev., (1962) 127, 324; E.S. Abers, B.W. Lee: Phys. Rep. 9C (1973) 1Google Scholar
- 15.D. Schutte: Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 810Google Scholar
- 16.F. Karsh: Particle World 1 (1989) 24Google Scholar
- 17.C.A. Dominguez, M. Loewe: Z. Phys. C—Particles Fields 51 (1991) 1Google Scholar
- 18.P. Gerber, H. Leutwyler: Nucl. Phys. B 321 (1989) 387Google Scholar
- 19.J.E. Mandula, M. Ogilvie: in: Variational calculations in quantum field theory. L. Polley, D.E.L. Pottinger. (eds.) Singapore: World Scientific 1988Google Scholar
- 20.J. Engels et al., Bielefeld Preprint BI-TP 29/90, (1990); H. Satz: in: Proceedings of Large Hadron Collider Workshop, Vol I, G. Jarlskog, D. Rein, (eds.) CERN, 90-10, ECFA 90-133 (1990)Google Scholar
- 21.T. Celik, J. Engels, H. Satz: Phys. Lett. B 129 (1983) 323Google Scholar
- 22.See for example in: A. L. Fetter, J.D. Walecka: Quantum theory of many particle systems. New York: McGraw Hill 1971Google Scholar
- 23.Such an apparent paradox of confinement with massive gluons has been considered in e.g.: J.M. Cornwall: Phys. Rev. D26 (1982) 1453Google Scholar
- 24.S. Nadkarni: Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) 491Google Scholar