Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields

, Volume 59, Issue 4, pp 585–590 | Cite as

Multiscaling in the hadronization in high energy collisions

  • P. Bożek
  • M. Płoszajczak
Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

We study the multiscaling in the fluctuations of multiparticle distributions at small scales. Similarly to the multiscaling effect, recently found in multifractal models, we analyse the dependence of the strength of the fluctuations on the low density cut-off in the cascade. The effect changes the scaling behaviour and leads to stronger dependence of the scaled factorial moments on the resolution than the power law. This could be an explanation of the behaviour observed recently in the experimental 3-dimensional data on the scaled factorial moments. The multiscaling analysis allows to restore the universality in the processes with different cut-offs and could be used in the analysis of the experimental data.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Białas: Nucl. Phys. A 525 (1991) 345c; R. Peschanski; Int. J. Mod. Phys. A6 (1991) 3681Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. Derrado et al.: MPI Preprint MPI-PhE/91-08; W. Kittel (NA22 Collab.): Proc. Ringberg Workshop on “Multiparticle production, fluctuations and fractal structure”, Ringberg 1991. Hwa R., Ochs W., Schmitz N. (eds.) Singapore World Scientific. (to be published); I. Derrado (NA35 Collab.): Proc. Ringberg Workshop on “Multiparticle production, fluctuations and fractal structure”, Ringberg 1991. Hwa, R., Ochs W., Schmitz N., (eds.) Singapore World Scientific. (to be published)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Białas, R. Peschanski: Nucl. Phys. B 273 763 (1986); ibid A. Białas, R. Peschanski: Nucl. Phys. B 308 (1988) 857Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Bożek, M. Płoszajczak: Nucl. Phys. A 545 (1992) 297cGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    U. Frisch, M. Vergassola: Europhys. Lett. 14 (1991) 439Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ph. Brax, R. Peschanski: Nucl. Phys. B 346 (1990) 65Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Kadanoff, S. Nagel, L. Wu, S. Zhou: Phys. Rev. A 39 (1989) 6524Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    X. Wu, L. Kadanoff, A. Libchaber, M. Sano: Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 (1990) 2140Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Dixon, L. Wu, S. Nagel, B. Williams, J. Carini: Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 1108Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Jensen, G. Paladin, A. Vulpiani: Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 208Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Paladin, A. Vulpiani: Phys. Rep. 156 (1987) 147Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Jćedrzejczak: Phys. Lett. B 228 (1989) 259Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Kittel, R. Peschanski: Nucl. Phys. A 532 (1991) 489cGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. Fiałkowski: Phys. Lett. B 272 (1991) 139Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M.I. Adamovich et al. (EMU01 Collab.): Z. Phys. C 49 (1991) 395Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. Fong, B. Webber: Nucl. Phys. B 355 (1991) 101Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    L. Van Hove: Ann. Phys. (NY) 192 (1989) 66.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Bożek
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Płoszajczak
    • 1
  1. 1.GANILCaenFrance
  2. 2.Institute of Nuclear PhysicsKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations