Sex Roles

, Volume 31, Issue 1–2, pp 1–22 | Cite as

Extradyadic romantic involvement: Moderating effects of sociosexuality and gender

  • David Wyatt Seal
  • Gina Agostinelli
  • Charlotte A. Hannett


In two separate experiments, the role of both sociosexuality (Simpson & Gangestad, 1991) and gender in moderating individuals' tendencies to pursue extradyadic relationships was examined. Unmarried subjects, predominantly Anglo and Hispanic, reportedly in “exclusive” dating relationships were presented with opportunities to become involved in a romantic relationship across a variety of situations. Their willingness to disregard both their own involved relationship status as well as their potential partner's current relationship status was assessed. Across experiments, individuals with an unrestricted sociosexual orientation indicated a greater willingness to pursue extradyadic involvement as evidenced by both self-report (Experiments 1 and 2) and behavioral (Experiment 2) measures. Further, on self-report measures, men indicated a greater willingness than did women to pursue extradyadic involvement. Gender differences disappeared on the behavioral measure. Finally, across experiments, subjects were less likely to pursue potential partners who were described as currently involved (versus uninvolved). This latter factor failed to interact with either sociosexuality or gender. Results are discussed from both evolutionary and cultural-contingency perspectives. Implications for practitioners are also presented.


Gender Difference Social Psychology Separate Experiment Relationship Status Romantic Relationship 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Byers, E. S., & Lewis, K. (1988). Dating couples' disagreements over the desired level of sexual intimacy.The Journal of Sex Research, 24, 15–29.Google Scholar
  2. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–14.Google Scholar
  3. Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559–570.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, R. D. (1990). The impact of AIDS on gender differences in willingness to engage in casual sex.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 771–782.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, R. D., & Hatfield, E. (1989). Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers.Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 2, 39–55.Google Scholar
  6. Cunningham, M. R. (1989). Reactions to heterosexual opening gambits: Female selectivity and male responsiveness.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 27–41.Google Scholar
  7. Downey, J. L., & Vitulli, W. F. (1987). Self-report measures of behavioral attributions related to interpersonal flirtation situations.Psychological Reports, 61, 899–904.Google Scholar
  8. Eysenck, H. J. (1974). Personality, premarital sexual permissiveness and assortative mating.Journal of Sex Research, 10, 47–51.Google Scholar
  9. Fisher, W. A., Byrne, D., White, L. A., & Kelley, K. (1988). Erotophobia-erotophilia as a dimension of personality.Journal of Sex Research, 25, 123–151.Google Scholar
  10. Gayford, J. J. (1979). Battered wives.British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 22, 496–503.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Griffitt, W., & Hatfield, E. (1985).Human Sexual Behavior. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
  12. Hill, C., Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1976). Breakups before marriage: The end of 103 affairs.Journal of Social Issues, 32, 147–168.Google Scholar
  13. Hansen, G. L. (1987). Extradyadic relations during courtship.Journal of Sex Research, 23, 382–390.Google Scholar
  14. Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (1990).Love, Sex & Intimacy. Harper Collins. New York: College Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Jesser, C. J. (1978). Male responses to direct verbal sexual initiatives of females.Journal of Sex Research, 14, 118–128.Google Scholar
  16. Lieberman, B. (1988). Extrapremarital intercourse: Attitudes toward a neglected behavior.The Journal of Sex Research, 24, 291–299.Google Scholar
  17. Lund, M. (1985). The development of investment and commitment scales for predicting continuity of personal relationships.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 3–23.Google Scholar
  18. Maticka-Tyndale, E. (1992). Social construction of HIV transmission and prevention among heterosexual young adults.Social Problems, 39, 238–252.Google Scholar
  19. McCormick, N. B., Brannigan, G. G., & LaPlante, M. N. (1984). Social desirability in the bedroom: Role of approval motivation in sexual relationships.Sex Roles, 11, 303–314.Google Scholar
  20. Roscoe, B., Cavanaugh, L. E., & Kennedy, D. R. (1988). Dating infidelity: behaviors, reasons and consequences.Adolescence, 23, 35–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1989). Young singles' scripts for a first date.Gender and Society, 3, 258–268.Google Scholar
  22. Rubin, Z., Peplau, L. A., & Hill, C. T. (1981). Loving and leaving: Sex differences in romantic attachments.Sex Roles, 7, 821–835.Google Scholar
  23. Seal, D. W. (April, 1992).Attraction: Do I take that dare? Presentation to the Southwestern Psychological Association's annual conference. Austin, TX.Google Scholar
  24. Seal, D. W. (Manuscript in progress).Safe sex behavior in young adult relationships. University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
  25. Seal, D. W., & Agostinelli, G. (1994). Individual differences associated with high-risk sexual behaviour: Implications for intervention programmes.AIDS Care, 6(4), 393–397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1992). Sociosexuality and romantic partner choice.Journal of Personality, 60, 31–51.Google Scholar
  28. Snyder, M. (1974). The self-monitoring of expressive behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526–537.Google Scholar
  29. Snyder, M., Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1986). Personality and sexual relations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 181–190.Google Scholar
  30. Stets, J., & Pirog-Good, M. A. (1987). Violence in dating relationships.Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 237–246.Google Scholar
  31. Tellegen, A. (1982).Brief manual of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript. University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  32. Thompson, A. P. (1983). Extramarital sex: A review of the research literature.The Journal of Sex Research, 19, 1–22.Google Scholar
  33. Thompson, A. P. (1984). Emotional and sexual components of extramarital relations.Journal of Marriage and Family, 46, 35–42.Google Scholar
  34. Woodcock, A. J., Stenner, K., & Ingham, R. (1992). Young people talking about HIV and AIDS: Interpretations of personal risk of infection.Health Education Research, 7, 229–247.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Wyatt Seal
    • 1
  • Gina Agostinelli
    • 1
  • Charlotte A. Hannett
    • 1
  1. 1.University of New MexicoUSA

Personalised recommendations