Acta Biotheoretica

, Volume 21, Issue 3–4, pp 260–273 | Cite as

Explanation in morphology

  • P. Dullemeijer
Article

Summary

In biology, and particularly in morphology, various types of explanation are found,e.g. causal, teleological, historical, etc.

In this article an attempt has been made to analyse the relations between the various explanations to strive for an encompassing explanatory theory.

The general structure of the explanatory theories appeared to be very similar, but the terms defining the phenomena and the types of the relations within the theories differ. To obtain a unifying theory it is necessary to develop methods to connect or transform the different elements.

An important aspect is that the definition of selected phenomena (terms) depends on the explanation pursued.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beckner, M. (1968). The biological way of thought.-Berkeley, University of California Press, 200 p.Google Scholar
  2. Bock, W. J. &G. von Wahlert (1965). Adaptation and the form-function complex.-Evolution19, p. 269–299.Google Scholar
  3. Blandino, G. (1969). Theories on the nature of life.-New York, Philosophical Library, 374 p.Google Scholar
  4. Cain, A. J. (1959). Function and taxonomic importance.-The systematic Assoc. Publ.3, p. 5–20.Google Scholar
  5. Dullemeijer, P. (1968). Some methodology problems in a holistic approach to functional morphology.-Acta biotheor., Leiden17, p. 203–214.Google Scholar
  6. Dullemeijer, P. (1970). Evolution of patterns and patterns of evolution.-Forma et Functio3, p. 223–232.Google Scholar
  7. Dullemeijer, P. (in press).-Principles of functional morphology.Google Scholar
  8. Gegenbaur, C. (1870). Grundzüge der vergleichenden Anatomie.-Leipzig, Engelmann, 892 p.Google Scholar
  9. Hempel C. G. &P. Oppenheim (1953). The logic of explanation.-In: H. Feigl &M. Brodbeck, Readings in the philosophy of science, p. 319–352.-New York, Appleton Century Crofts.Google Scholar
  10. Jeuken, M. (1968). A note on models and explanation in biology.-Acta biotheor., Leiden18, p. 284–290.Google Scholar
  11. Klaauw, C. J. van der (1964). Elements for an objective and neutral introduction to the philosophic backgrounds and prospects of the biological sciences.-Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wet. C,67, p. 119–127.Google Scholar
  12. Klaauw, C. J.van der (1966). Introduction to the philosophic backgrounds and prospects of the supraspecific comparative anatomy of conservative characters in the adult stages of conservative elements of vertebrata with an enumeration of many examples.-Verh. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wet. 2e reeks,57, 1, 196 p.Google Scholar
  13. Klaauw, C. J. van der (1961). Verklaren, begrijpen, waarheid en zekerheid in de biologie.-Annalen Genootschap Wetensch. Philosophie33, p. 101–117.Google Scholar
  14. Meyer, A. (1926). Logik der Morphologie im Rahmen einer Logik der gesamten Biologie.-Berlin, Springer, 290 p.Google Scholar
  15. Nieuwenhuys, R. (1966). The establishment of homologies in the central nervous System. Abstract.-Acta morph. neérl.-scand.Google Scholar
  16. Olson, E. C. & R. L.Miller (1958). Morphological integration.-University of Chicago Press, 317 p.Google Scholar
  17. Owen, R. (1843). Lectures on the Comparative Anatomy and Physiology of the Invertebrate Animals.-London, Longman, Brown, Green & Longmans.Google Scholar
  18. Remane, A. (1956). Die Grundlagen des natürlichen Systems der vergleichenden Anatomie und der Phylogenetik.-Leipzig, Geest & Portig, 364 p.Google Scholar
  19. Schwab, J. J. (1960). What do scientists do ?-Behav. Sci.3, 1, p. 1–27.Google Scholar
  20. Sokal, R. R. &P. H. A. Sneath (1963). Principles of numerical taxonomy.-San Francisco & London, Freeman & C, 359 p.Google Scholar
  21. Geoffroy St. Hilaire, E. (1818). Philosophie anatomique.-Paris.Google Scholar
  22. — (1830). Principes de philosophie zoologique.-Paris.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© E. J. Brill 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Dullemeijer
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoological LaboratoryState University of LeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations