Advertisement

Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields

, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp 523–526 | Cite as

Coherent production of π+ mesons in ν-neon interactions

  • BEBC WA59 Collaboration
  • P. Marage
  • P. P. Allport
  • N. Armenise
  • J. P. Baton
  • M. Berggren
  • W. Burkot
  • M. Calicchio
  • T. Coghen
  • A. M. Cooper-Sarkar
  • O. Erriquez
  • J. Guy
  • P. O. Hulth
  • G. T. Jones
  • E. Matsinos
  • D. R. O. Morrison
  • M. Neveu
  • M. A. Parker
  • J. Sacton
  • R. A. Sansum
  • N. Schmitz
  • E. Simopoulou
  • K. Varvell
  • A. Vayaki
  • W. Venus
  • H. Wachsmuth
  • W. Wittek
Article

Abstract

The coherent production of π+ mesons by charged current neutrino interactions on neon nuclei in BEBC is compared to the predictions of the PCAC hypothesis and the meson dominance model. Good agreement is observed.

Keywords

Field Theory Elementary Particle Quantum Field Theory Neon Particle Acceleration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. Marage et al.: Z. Phys. C — Particles and Fields 31 (1986) 191Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Faissner et al.: Phys. Lett. 125B (1983) 230Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Isiksal, D. Rein, J.G. Morfin: Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 (1984) 1096Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. Bergsma et al.: Phys. Lett. 157B (1985) 469Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H.J. Grabosch et al.: Z. Phys. C — Particles and Fields 31 (1986) 203Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. Baltay et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 (1986) 2629Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V.V. Ammosov et al.: Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 45 (1987) 1029Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Marage et al.: Phys. Lett. 140B (1984) 137Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A.A. Belkov, B.Z. Kopeliovich: Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 46 (1987) 499Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Marage et al.: Z. Phys. C — Particles and Fields 35 (1987) 275Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Gatto et al.: Particle Data Group: Phys. Lett. 204B, (1988) 1Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    As indicated in [9], the relevant mass in (A. 1) might be not thea 1 mass itself, but an average mass-lower than thea 1 mass-due to the contributions of thea 1 and of non-resonant (ρπ) systemsGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    See [29] and [31] in [10]Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • BEBC WA59 Collaboration
  • P. Marage
    • 3
  • P. P. Allport
    • 8
  • N. Armenise
    • 1
  • J. P. Baton
    • 10
  • M. Berggren
    • 11
  • W. Burkot
    • 6
  • M. Calicchio
    • 1
  • T. Coghen
    • 6
  • A. M. Cooper-Sarkar
    • 9
  • O. Erriquez
    • 1
  • J. Guy
    • 9
  • P. O. Hulth
    • 11
  • G. T. Jones
    • 2
  • E. Matsinos
    • 5
  • D. R. O. Morrison
    • 4
  • M. Neveu
    • 10
  • M. A. Parker
    • 4
  • J. Sacton
    • 3
  • R. A. Sansum
    • 12
  • N. Schmitz
    • 7
  • E. Simopoulou
    • 5
  • K. Varvell
    • 2
  • A. Vayaki
    • 5
  • W. Venus
    • 9
  • H. Wachsmuth
    • 4
  • W. Wittek
    • 7
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Fisica dell'Università e Sezione INFNBariItaly
  2. 2.University of BirminghamBirminghamUK
  3. 3.Inter-University Institute for High EnergiesULB-VUBBrusselsBelgium
  4. 4.CERNGeneva 23Switzerland
  5. 5.Nuclear Research Centre DemokritosAthensGreece
  6. 6.Institute of Nuclear PhysicsCracowPoland
  7. 7.Max-Planck-Institut für Physik und AstrophysikMünchen 40Federal Republic of Germany
  8. 8.Department of Nuclear PhysicsOxfordUK
  9. 9.Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryDidcotUK
  10. 10.Centre d'Etudes Nucléaires, SaclayDPhPEGif-sur-YvetteFrance
  11. 11.Institute of PhysicsUniversity of StockholmStockholmSweden
  12. 12.Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations