Sex Roles

, Volume 35, Issue 1–2, pp 57–77

Being female in the eighties and nineties: Conflicts between new opportunities and traditional expectations among white, middle class, heterosexual college women

  • Lesley Lazin Novack
  • David R. Novack


The eighties and nineties would appear to be an ideal time for a young woman to come of age in American society. Legal barriers to opportunity have been virtually eliminated, and attitudes toward women seem to reflect greater cultural appreciation of their abilities and needs. However, there are indications that females are presented with conflicting images which nurture new career-related expectations while simultaneously stressing traditional expressions of femininity, especially marriage and motherhood. The research in this article explores the dynamics of conflicting demands on young women through a survey conducted at a small liberal arts college with students who are predominantly white and heterosexual, from middle and upper income families. (Only three percent of the students are from minority backgrounds.) Issues explored involve spousal obligations, salary differentials, marriage-career aspirations, responsibilities toward young children, and perceived degree of liberalism-conservatism pertaining to the place of women in society. The article concludes with a focus on the dilemma posed by new opportunities through structural change and the coexistence of cultural lag in the form of traditional norms of femininity.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andersen, M. L. (1993).Thinking about women: Sociological perspectives on sex and gender. (Third Edition) New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  2. Basow, S. A. (1992).Gender stereotypes and roles. (Third edition). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  3. Bem, S. L. (1993).The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual equality. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Braverman, L. B. (1989). Beyond the myth of motherhood, in M. Goldrick, C. M. Anderson and F. Walsh (Eds.),Women and families. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cherlin, A. (1987). Women in the Family, in S. Rix (Ed.),The American woman 1987–1988: A report in depth. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  6. Clarke-Stewart, K. A. (1989). Infant day care: Maligned or malignant?American Psychologist, 44 266–273.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Conway, J. K. (1989). Higher education for women: Models for the 21st century.American Behavioral Scientist, 32 633–639.Google Scholar
  8. Dancer, L. S., & Gilbert, L. A. (1993). Spouses' family work participation its relation to wives' occupational level,Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 28 127–145.Google Scholar
  9. Degler, C. N. (1980).At odds: Women and the family in America from the revolution to the present. Oxford, New York, Toronto, and Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dorenkamp, A. G., McClymer, J. F., Moynihan, M. M., & Vadum, A. C. (1995).Images of women in popular American culture. (Second Edition) New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
  11. England, P. (1992).Comparable worth: Theories and evidence. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  12. England, P., & Farkas, G. (1986).Households, employment, and gender: A social, economic, and demographic View. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
  13. Evans, S. M. (1987). Women in twentieth century America: An overview. In S. Rix (Ed.),The American woman 1987–1988: A report in depth. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  14. Frankfort, R. (1977).Collegiate women: Domesticity and career in turn-of-the-century America. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Friedan, B. (1963).The feminine mystique. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  16. Grana, S. J., Moore, H. A., Wilson, J. K., & Miller, M. (1993). The contexts of housework and the paid labor force: Women's perceptions of the demand levels of their work.Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 28 295–315.Google Scholar
  17. Hanson, S. L., & Sloane, D. M. (1992). Young children and job satisfaction.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54 799–811.Google Scholar
  18. Hertz, R. (1989). Dual career couples: Sharing marriages through work. In B. J. Risman and P. Schwartz (Eds.),Gender in intimate relationships. California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  19. Hoffman, L. W. (1989). Effects of maternal employment in the two parent family.American Psychologist, 44 283–292.Google Scholar
  20. Keith, P. M., Gordy, W. J., & Powers, E. (1981). Employment characteristics and psychological well-being of men in two-job families.Psychological Reports, 49 975–978.Google Scholar
  21. Komarovsky, M. (1985).Women in college. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  22. Lips, H., & Colwill, N. (1993). Issues in the workplace. In H. Lips (Ed.),Sex and Gender. California, London, and Toronto: Mayfield Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  23. Lott, B. (1994).Women's lives: Themes and variations in gender learning. Second edition. California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  24. Matlin, M. W. (1993).The psychology of women. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  25. Matthews, K. A., & Rodin, J. (1989). Women's changing work roles: Impact on health, family, and public policy.American Psychologist, 44 1389–1393.Google Scholar
  26. McLaughlin, S. D. (1988).The changing lives of American women. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  27. Mott, F. L. (1982). Women: The employment revolution. In F. L. Mott (Ed.),The Employment revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Nozick, R. (1993). Love's bond. In A. Minas (Ed.),Gender basics: Feminist perspectives on men and women. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  29. Phares, V. (1992). Where's poppa? The relative lack of attention to the role of fathers in child and adolescent psychopathology.American Psychologist, 47 656–664.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Polatnick, M. R. (1993). Why men don't rear children. In A. Minas (Ed.),Gender basics: Feminist perspectives on men and women. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  31. Scarr, S., & Eisenberg, M. (1993). Childcare research: Issues, perspectives, and results.Annual Review of Psychology, 44 613–644.Google Scholar
  32. Schroeder, K. A., Blood, L. L., & Maluso, D. (1992). An intergenerational analysis of expectations for women's career and family roles.Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 26 273–291.Google Scholar
  33. Solomon, B. B. (1989). Demographic changes and women on campus.American Behavioral Scientist, 32 640–646.Google Scholar
  34. United States Department of Commerce (1994).Statistical Abstract of the United States 1994. (Fourth Edition).Google Scholar
  35. United States Department of Education (National Center for Education Statistics, Office of Educational Research and Improvement (1994).Digest of Education Statistics, 1994.Google Scholar
  36. United States Department of Labor, Women's Bureau (1994).1993 Handbook on women workers: Trends and issues. Google Scholar
  37. Vogel, L. (1993).Mother on the job: Maternity policy in the workplace. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Whicker, M. L., & Kronenfield, J. (1986).Sex role changes, technology, politics, and power. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  39. Willetts-Bloom, M. C., & Nock, S. L. (1994). The influence of maternal employment on gender role attitudes of men and women.Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 30 371–389.Google Scholar
  40. Wilson, R. (1991). Colleges start programs to encourage women who are interested in engineering careers.Chronicle of Higher Education, 37 9, A27.Google Scholar
  41. Wise, D. (1851).Young Lady's Counsellor. New York: Carlton and Phillips.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lesley Lazin Novack
    • 1
  • David R. Novack
    • 2
  1. 1.Mary Baldwin CollegeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Sociology & AnthropologyWashington and Lee UniversityLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations