Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 34, Issue 1–2, pp 117–126 | Cite as

Professional service involvement of leadership faculty: An assessment of gender, role, and satisfaction

  • Darla J. Twale
  • David M. Shannon
Brief Report

Abstract

This study explored gender differences among educational administration faculty and their participation in and satisfaction with professional association activities. The study population would be characterized as overwhelmingly male and white, but with women and minority candidates beginning to enter the faculty ranks. Women faculty reported involvement in more professional service activities and a slightly higher satisfaction with their involvement than their male colleagues. However, women participated in different types of and more professional association activities than men.

Keywords

Gender Difference Social Psychology Professional Association Service Activity High Satisfaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldridge, J., Curtis, D., Ecker, G., & Riley, G. (1978).Policy-making and effective leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Bjorkquist, D. (1988). Tenure and promotion in the 80s: Implications for the profession.Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 22, 60–69.Google Scholar
  3. Blackburn, R., Wenzel, S., & Bieber, J. (1994). Minority vs. majority faculty publication performance: A research note.Review of Higher Education, 17, 271–282.Google Scholar
  4. Braskamp, L., & Ory, J. (1994).Assessing faculty work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Chamberlain, M. (Ed.) (1988).Women in academe: Progress and prospects. New York: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Elder, P. (1984). The importance of professional involvement.Journal of the National Association of Women Deans, Administrators, and Counselors, 48, 13–19.Google Scholar
  7. Ernst, R. (1982). Women in high education leadership positions—It doesn't happen by accident.CUPA Journal, 33, 19–22.Google Scholar
  8. Hall, R., & Sandler, B. (1984).Out of the classroom: A chilly campus climate for women? Project on the Status and Education of Women. Washington, DC.: Association of American Colleges.Google Scholar
  9. Klein, S., & Ortman, P. (1994). Continuing the journey toward gender equity.Educational Researcher, 23, 13–21.Google Scholar
  10. Lawrence, J., et al. (1984).A study of the graduate deanship: Does gender make a difference? Washington, DC.: Report of the Committee on Women. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 253 176.)Google Scholar
  11. Luna, G. (1994). Conferences and workshops: The art of attending.College Student Affairs Journal, 14, 39–43.Google Scholar
  12. Miller, R. (1987).Evaluating faculty for promotion and tenure. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Norton, M. S. (1995). UCEA Center on patterns of professional preparation in educational administration.UCEA Review, 36, 7–10.Google Scholar
  14. Olsen, D., et al. (1991, November).Women and minority faculty job satisfaction: A structural model examines the effect of professional role interests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Boston. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 339 323.)Google Scholar
  15. Queralt, M. (1982).The role of the mentor on the career development of university faculty members and academic administrators. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Women Deans, Administrators, and Counselors, Indianapolis. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 216 614.)Google Scholar
  16. Sagaria, M. (1988). Administrative mobility and gender: Patterns and processes in higher education.Journal of Higher Education, 59, 305–326.Google Scholar
  17. Schetin, E. (1976). Remembering the ladies: Abigail Adams and the women deans, administrators, and counselors.Journal of the National Association of Women Deans, Administrators, and Counselors, 39, 163–166.Google Scholar
  18. Schrank, M., & Young, R. (1987). The role of professional associations. In L. Moore & R. Young (Eds.).Expanding opportunities for professional education, New Directions for Student Services, No. 37. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. Serafin, A. (1992, January).Teaching, research, and service: Are these role functions satisfying to Venezuelan faculty women? Paper presented at the annual International Conference for Women in Higher Education, San Diego.Google Scholar
  20. Simeone, A. (1987).Academic women: Working towards equality. South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Sorcinelli, M., & Andrews, P. (1987). Articulating career goals: A comparison of male and female university faculty.Journal of the National Association of Women Deans, Administrators, and Counselors, 50, 11–19.Google Scholar
  22. Twale, D. (1995). Comparisons of NASPA membership.NASPA Journal, 32, 293–301.Google Scholar
  23. Williams, D., Gore, W., Broches, C., & Lostoski, C. (1987). One faculty's perception of its governance role.Journal of Higher Education, 58, 629–657.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darla J. Twale
    • 1
  • David M. Shannon
    • 1
  1. 1.Educational FoundationsLeadership, and TechnologyAuburn UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations