Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 32, Issue 9–10, pp 565–582 | Cite as

Images of occupations: Components of gender and status in occupational stereotypes

  • Peter Glick
  • Korin Wilk
  • Michele Perreault
Article

Abstract

A multidimensional approach to occupational gender type was explored. In Study 1, participants' spontaneous images of various jobs were elicited. The attributes generated were used to develop a job images questionnaire employed in Study 2 on which participants rated a random sample of 100 occupational titles. Occupational images were primarily structured on two orthogonal dimensions: prestige and gender type. The multidimensional approach to occupational gender-type was supported in that important gender-related occupational attributes (masculine personality trait requirements and analytical skills) did not load on the gender-type factor, but did load highly on the prestige factor. Thus, even though the prestige and gender-type factors were orthogonal, specific gender-related attributes were related to perceived occupational prestige.

Keywords

Social Psychology Personality Trait Orthogonal Dimension Multidimensional Approach Analytical Skill 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bem, S. L. (1977). On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 196–205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Benyamini, Y., & Gati, I. (1987). Perceptions of occupations: Aspects versus dimensions.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 30, 309–329.Google Scholar
  4. Bose, C. E. (1985).Jobs and gender: A study of occupational prestige. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  5. Bose, C. E., & Rossi, P. H. (1983). Gender and jobs: Prestige standings of occupations as affected by gender.American Sociological Review, 48, 316–330.Google Scholar
  6. Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1983). The structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label.Social Cognition, 3, 145–167.Google Scholar
  7. Deaux, K., Winton, W., Crowley, M., & Lewis, L. L. (1985). Level of categorization and content of gender stereotypes.Social Cognition, 2, 145–167.Google Scholar
  8. Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1993). Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes and judgments of competence. In W. Strobe & M. Hewstone (Eds.),European review of social psychology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. England, P. (1979). Women and occupational prestige: A case of vacuous equality.Signs, 5, 252–265.Google Scholar
  10. Gill, S., Stockard, J., Johnson, M., & Williams, S. (1987). Measuring gender differences: The expressive dimension and critique of the androgyny scales.Sex Roles, 17, 375–400.Google Scholar
  11. Glick, P. (1991). Trait-based and sex-based discrimination in occupational prestige, occupational salary, and hiring.Sex Roles, 25, 351–378.Google Scholar
  12. Glick, P., Zion, C., & Nelson, C. (1988). What mediates sex discrimination in hiring decisions?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 178–186.Google Scholar
  13. Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations.Journal of counseling Psychology Monograph, 28, 545–579.Google Scholar
  14. Gottfredson, L. S., & Brown, V. (1978). Holland codes for the 1960 and 1970 census: Detailed occupational titles.JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 8(1), 22.Google Scholar
  15. Haefner, J. E. (1977). Race, age, sex, and competence as factors of employer selection of the disadvantaged.Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 199–202.Google Scholar
  16. Heilman, M. (1984). Information as a deterrent against sex discrimination: The effects of sex and information type on preliminary employment decisions.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 174–186.Google Scholar
  17. Holland, J. L. (1973).Making vocational choices: A theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Kalin, R., & Hodgins, D. C. (1984). Sex bias in judgments of occupational suitability.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 16, 311–325.Google Scholar
  19. Krefting, L. A., Berger, P. K., & Wallace, M. K., Jr. (1978). The contribution of sex distribution, job content, and occupational classification to job sextyping: Two studies.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 13, 181–191.Google Scholar
  20. Locksley, A., Borgida, E., Brekke, N., & Hepburn, C. (1980). Sex stereotypes and social judgment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 821–831.Google Scholar
  21. O'Dowd, D. D., & Beardslee, D. C. (1960).College student images of a selected group of professions and occupations. (Cooperative Research Project, No. 562, 8142.) Middletown, CT: Weslyan University.Google Scholar
  22. Roe, A. (1956).The psychology of occupations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  23. Rosen, B., & Jerdee, T. H. (1974). Effects of applicant sex and difficulty of job on evaluations of candidates for managerial positions.Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 9–14.Google Scholar
  24. Shinar, E. H. (1975). Sexual stereotypes of occupations.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 7, 99–111.Google Scholar
  25. Spence, J. T. (1993). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multi-factorial theory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 624–635.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Super, D. E. (1957).The psychology of careers. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  27. Treiman, D. J. (1977).Occupational prestige in comparative perspective. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census (1987).Male-female differences in work-experience, occupations, and earnings: 1984. (Household Economic Studies Series P-70, No. 10.) Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  29. Wiggins, J. S., & Holzmuller, A. (1978). Psychological androgyny and interpersonal behavior.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 40–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Wiggins, J. S., & Holzmuller, A. (1981). Further evidence on androgyny and interpersonal flexibility.Journal of Research in Personality, 15, 67–80.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Glick
    • 1
  • Korin Wilk
    • 1
  • Michele Perreault
    • 1
  1. 1.Lawrence UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations