Theoretical study of the visible photodissociation spectrum of Ar 3 +

  • F. X. Gadéa
Article

Abstract

The photodissociation of Ar 3 + is studied following a consistent theoretical approach from the Potential Energy Surfaces to the dynamics. Six P.E.S. are computed according to a D.I.M.-like model Hamiltonian. Transition dipole moments are determined using a similar method. The 4-D dynamics of this system is obtained with the H.W.D. method (Hemiquantal dynamic with the Whole DIM basis). All the 4 nuclear degrees of freedom and all the 6 electronic states are involved in the dynamical calculations, allowing for very general investigations.

The main theoretical results are:
  1. 1

    the spectrum essentially results from a Σ → Σg transition to the second excited electronic state along with a symmetric stretching motion

     
  2. 2

    excited Ar 3 + molecules almost all dissociate in Ar+ + 2 Ar

     
  3. 3

    dissociation in Ar 2 + + Ar requires special conditions such as low laser excitation and is predicted to increase with a specific excitation of the bending mode

     
  4. 4

    the dominant symmetric stretching motion induces a bimodal kinetic energy distribution of the fragments.

     

All these points are in close agreement with experimental results.

PACS

36.40.d 31.70.Hq 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Monolopoulos, D.E., Wyatt, R.E.: Chem. Phys. Lett.159 123 (1989)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Launay, J.M., Le Dourneuf, M.: Chem. Phys. Lett.163 178 (1989)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amarouche, M., Durand, G., Malrieu, J.P.: J. Chem. Phys.88 1010 (1988)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tully, J.: J. Chem. Phys.64 3182 (1976)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diestler, D.J.: J. Chem. Phys.78 2240 (1983); Durup, J.: Chem. Phys. Lett.132, 299 (1986)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gadéa, F.X.: Thèse d'Etat, Toulouse, France (1987)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Amarouche, M., Gadéa, F.X., Durup, J.: Chem. Phys.130 145 (1989)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gadéa, F.X., Amarouche, M.: Chem. Phys.140 385 (1990)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hesslich, J., Kuntz, P.J.: Z. Phys. D — Atoms, Molecules and Clusters251 (1986)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Böhmer, H.U., Peyerimhoff, S.D.: Z. Phys. D — Atoms, Molecules and Clusters195 (1986)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Levinger, N.E., Ray, D., Murray, K.K., Mullin, A.S., Schulz, C.P., Lineberger, W.C.: J. Chem. Phys.89 71 (1988)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goursaud, S.: Thèse d'Etat, Orsay, France (1978); Sizun, M.: Thèse d'Etat, Orsay, France (1980)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Snodgrass, J.T., Roehl, C.M., Bowers, M.: Chem. Phys. Lett.159 10 (1989)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nagata, T., Hirokawa, J., Ikegami, T., Kondow, T.: Chem. Phys. Lett.171 433 (1990)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. X. Gadéa
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Physique QuantiqueU.A. 505 du C.N.R.S. Universite Paul SabatierToulouse CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations