Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 145–153 | Cite as

Effects of adequacy of gender reassignment surgery on psychological adjustment: A follow-up of fourteen male-to-female patients

  • Michael W. Ross
  • Jillian A. Need
Article

Abstract

The relationship between the adequacy of surgical result and postoperative psychopathology was examined in 14 male-to-female transsexuals selected for the absence of preoperative psychopathology. Data indicated that the best predictors of postoperative psychopathology as rated on Hunt and Hampson's (1980) Standardized Rating Format were breast scarring, erectile urethral meatus, current social supports, family reaction, urinary incontinence, and need for extra surgery. Together, these accounted for 98% of the variance in postoperative psychopathology. These data suggest that factors which make it difficult for postoperative transsexuals to “pass” or which continue to remind them of their gender-reassigned status are associated with adjustment difficulties. Surgical results may be a major determinant of postoperative psychopathology.

Key words

transsexual sex reassignment surgery postoperative adjustment follow-up 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ball, J. R. B. (1981). Thirty years experience with transsexualism.Aust. N.Z. J. Psychiat. 15: 39–43.Google Scholar
  2. Benjamin, H. (1966).The Transsexual Phenomenon Julian Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Blanchard, R. (1985). Gender dysphoria and gender reorientation. In B. W. Steiner (ed.),Gender Dysphoria: Development, Research, Management Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Blanchard, R., Steiner, B. W., and Clemmensen, L. H. (1985). Gender dysphoria, gender reorientation, and the clinical management of transsexualism.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 53: 295–304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hoenig, J., Kenna, J., and Youd, A., (1971). Surgical treatment for transsexualism.Acta Psychiat. Scand. 47: 106–133.Google Scholar
  6. Hore, B. D., Nicolle, F. V., and Calnan, J. S. (1975). Male transsexualism in England: sixteen cases with surgical internvention.Arch. Sex. Behav. 4: 81–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hunt, D. D., and Hampson, J. L. (1980). A standardized psychosocial rating format for the evaluation of results of sex reassignment surgery.Arch. Sex. Behav. 9: 255–263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lundström, B. (1981).Gender Dysphoria: a Social-Psychiatric Follow-up Study of 31 Cases not Accepted for Sex Reassignment Akademiförlaget, Göteborg.Google Scholar
  9. Markland, C. (1975). Transsexual surgery. In Wynn, R. D. (ed.),Obstetrics and Gynaecology Annual Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Pauly, I. B. (1965). Male sexual inversion: Transsexualism.Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 13: 172–181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Pauly, I. B. (1968). The current status of the change of sex operation.J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 147: 460–467.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wålinder, J., and Thuwe, I. (1975).A Social-Psychiatric Follow-up Study of 24 Sex Reassigned Transsexuals Akademiförlaget, Göteborg.Google Scholar
  13. Wålinder, J., Lundström, B., and Thuwe, I. (1978). Prognostic factors in the assessment of male transsexuals for sex reassignment.Br. J. Psychiat. 132: 16–20.Google Scholar
  14. Walters, W. A. W., Kennedy, T., and Ross, M. W. (1986). Results of gender reassignment: Is it all worthwhile? In Walters, W. A. W., and Ross, M. W. (eds.),Transsexualism and Sex Reassignment Oxford University Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael W. Ross
    • 1
  • Jillian A. Need
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryFlinders University Medical SchoolAdelaideSouth Australia
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyFlinders University Medical SchoolAdelaideSouth Australia

Personalised recommendations