Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 11–19 | Cite as

Sexual behavior of castrated sex offenders

  • Nikolaus Heim
Article

Abstract

Data are reported on the sexual behavior of 39 released sex offenders who agreed voluntarily to surgical castration while imprisoned in West Germany. Findings indicated that frequency of coitus, masturbation, and sexual thoughts are seen as strongly reduced after castration. Sexual desire and sexual arousability are perceived by the subjects as having been considerably impaired by castration. In comparison with other studies, however, it was shown that male sexual capacity was not extinguished soon after castration. Particularly noteworthy is that 11 of 35 castrates (31%) stated they were still able to engage in sexual intercourse. Rapists proved to be sexually more active after castration than homosexuals or pedophiliacs. There seems to be a strong effect on sexual behavior only if castration is performed on males between the age of 46 and 59 years. In general, the findings do not justify recommending surgical castration as a reliable treatment for incarcerated sex offenders.

Key words

castration sex offenders treatment of sexual deviations sexual behavior testosterone 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bauer, J. (1967).Differential Diagnosis of Internal Diseases Grune and Stratton, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Beach, F. A. (1944). Experimental studies of sexual behavior in male mammals.J. Clin. Endocrinol. 4: 126–134.Google Scholar
  3. Blöschl, L. (1966). Kullbacks 2Î-Test als ökonomische Alternative zurϰ 2-Probe.Psychol. Beitr. 9: 379–406.Google Scholar
  4. Bremer, J. (1959).Asexualization: A Follow-Up Study of 244 Cases Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Cornu, F. (1973).Katamnesen bei kastrierten Stittlichkeitsdelinquenten aus forensisch-psychiatrischer Sicht Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
  6. Cureton, E. (1967). The normal approximation to the signed-rank sampling distribution when zero differences are present.J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 62: 1068–1069.Google Scholar
  7. Egle, N., and Altwein, J. (1975). Postpuberal castration and prostatic carcinoma.Urology VI: 471–473.Google Scholar
  8. Ford, C., and Beach, F. A. (1951).Patterns of Sexual Behavior Harper, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Hammond, T. (1934). The function of the testes after puberty.Br. J. Urol. 6: 128–141.Google Scholar
  10. Hardy, K. (1964). An appetitional theory of sexual motivation.Psychol. Rev. 71: 1–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Heim, N. (1980).Die Kastration und ihre Folgen bei Sexualstraftätern Schwartz, Göttingen.Google Scholar
  12. Heim, N., and Hursch, C. (1979). Castration for sex offenders: Treatment or punishment? A review and critique of recent European literature.Arch. Sex. Behav. 8: 281–304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Langelüddeke., A. (1963).Die Entmannung von Sittlichkeitsverbrechern de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
  14. Oliven, J. F. (1974).Clinical Sexuality. A Manual for the Physician and the Professions Lippincott, Philadelphia and Toronto.Google Scholar
  15. Plenge, H. (1961). Die Behandlung erheblich rückfälliger Sexualdelinquenten, vornehmlich der Homosexuellen, unter Berücksichtigung der Kastration.Monatsschr. Kriminol. Strafrechtsreform 44: 15–41.Google Scholar
  16. Whalen, R. (1966). Sexual motivation.Psychol. Rev. 73: 151–163.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikolaus Heim
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology and SociologyUniversity of KonstanzKonstanz 1Federal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations