Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 121–133 | Cite as

Physiological correlates of imagery-induced orgasm in women

  • Beverly Whipple
  • Gina Ogden
  • Barry R. Komisaruk


Orgasm has been reported to occur in response to imagery in the absence of any physical stimulation. This study was undertaken to ascertain whether the subjective report of imagery-induced orgasm is accompanied by physiological and perceptual events that are characteristic of genitally stimulated orgasm. Subjects were women who claimed that they could experience orgasm from imagery alone. Orgasm from self-induced imagery or genital self-stimulation generated significant increases in systolic blood pressure, heart rate, pupil diameter, pain detection threshold, and pain tolerance threshold over resting control conditions. These findings provide evidence that orgasm from self-induced imagery and genital self-stimulation can each produce significant and substantial net sympathetic activation and concomitant significant increases in pain thresholds. The increases in the self-induced imagery orgasm condition were comparable in magnitude to those in the genital self-stimulation-produced orgasm condition. On this basis we state that physical genital stimulation is evidently not necessary to produce a state that is reported to be an orgasm and that a reassessment of the nature of orgasm is warranted.

Key words

orgasm imagery genital self-stimulation blood pressure heart rate pupil diameter pain thresholds women 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bohlen, J. G. (1983). State of the science of sexual physiology research. In Davis, C. M. (ed.),Challenges in Sexual Science, Society for the Scientific Study of Sex, Philadelphia, pp. 161–173.Google Scholar
  2. Catelli, J. M., Sved, A. F., and Komisaruk, B. R. (1987). Vaginocervical probing elevates blood pressure and induces analgesia by separate mechanisms.Physiol. Behav. 41: 609–612.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Francoeur, R. T. (1982).Becoming a Sexual Person Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Gallager, W. (1982). The etiology of orgasm.Discover, pp. 51–59.Google Scholar
  5. GB-Stat. (1989).GB-Stat Version 2. Dynamic Microsystems, Silver Springs, MD.Google Scholar
  6. Graber, B. (1982). The circumvaginal musculature and orgasm: Concluding remarks. In Graber, B. (ed.)Circumvaginal Musculature and Sexual Function, S. Karger, New York, pp. 115–120.Google Scholar
  7. Hite, S. (1976).The Hite Report: A Nationwide Study of Female Sexuality, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Kaplan, H. S. (1974).The New Sex Therapy. Brunner/Mazel, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C., and Gebhard, P. (1953).Sexual Behavior in the Human Female, W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  10. Komisaruk, B. R. (1978). The nature of the neural substrate of female sexual behaviour in mammals and its hormonal sensitivity: Review and speculations. In Hutchison, J. B. (ed.),Biological Determinants of Sexual Behavior, Wiley, New York, pp. 349–393.Google Scholar
  11. Komisaruk, B. R. (1982). Visceral-somatic integration in behavior, cognition, and “psychosomatic” disease.Adv. Study Behav., 12: 107–140.Google Scholar
  12. Komisaruk, B. R., and Wallman, J. (1977). Antinociceptive effects of vaginal stimulation in rats: Neurophysiological and behavioral studies.Brain Res. 137: 85–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Komisaruk, B. R., and Whipple, B. (1988). The role of stimulation-produced analgesia in reproductive processes. In Genazzani, A. R., Nappi, G., Facchinetti, F., and Martignoni, E. (eds.),Pain and Reproduction, Parthenon, Park Ridge, New Jersey, pp. 125–140.Google Scholar
  14. Levin, R. J., & Wagner, G. (1985). Orgasm in women in the laboratory-quantitative studies on duration, latency, and vaginal blood flow.Arch. Sex. Behav. 14: 439–449.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Levin, R. J., & Wagner, G. (1987). Self-reported central sexual arousal without vaginal arousal-duplicity or veracity revealed by objective measurement.J. Sex Res. 22: 540–544.Google Scholar
  16. Masters, W. H., and Johnson, V. E. (1966).Human Sexual Response, Little, Brown, Boston.Google Scholar
  17. Miller, B. F., and Keane, C. B. (1978).Encyclopedia and Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing, and Allied Health. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  18. Ogden, G. (1981). Perception of touch in easily orgasmic women during peak sexual experiences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Institute for Advanced Study of Human Sexuality, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  19. Szechtman, H., Adler, N., and Komisaruk, B. R. (1985). Mating induces pupillary dilatation in female rats: Role of pelvic nerve.Physiol. Behav. 35: 295–301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Wagner, G. (Producer). (1973).Physiological Responses of the Sexually Stimulated Female in the Laboratory [Film]. New York: Focus International, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Whipple, B., and Komisaruk, B. R. (1985). Elevation of pain threshold by vaginal stimulation in women.Pain, 21: 357–367.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Whipple, B., and Komisaruk, B. R. (1988). Analgesia produced in women by genital self-stimulation.J. Sex Res. 24, 130–140.Google Scholar
  23. Whipple, B., Martinez-Gomez, M., Oliva-Zarate, L., Pacheco, P., and Komisaruk, B. R. (1989). Inverse relationship between intensity of vaginal self-stimulation-produced analgesia and level of chronic intake of a dietary source of capsaicin.Physiol. Behav. 46: 247–252.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Whipple, B., Ogden, G., and Komisaruk, B. R. (submitted). Relative analgesic effect of imagery compared to genital self-stimulation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beverly Whipple
    • 1
  • Gina Ogden
    • 2
  • Barry R. Komisaruk
    • 3
  1. 1.College of Nursing, RutgersThe State University of New JerseyNewarkUSA
  2. 2.CambridgeUSA
  3. 3.Institute of Animal Behavior, RutgersThe State University of New JerseyNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations