Abstract
Male (n= 170) and female (n= 212) college students viewed photographs, which had been prerated for physical attractiveness, of three opposite-sex individuals. These photographs were paired with three levels of occupational status and income. Subjects indicated their willingness to engage in relationships of varying levels of sexual intimacy and marital potential with the portrayed individuals. Analyses of variance, correlations, and trend analyses supported the hypotheses. Compared to men, women are more likely to prefer or insist that sexual intercourse occur in relationships that involve affection and marital potential, and women place more emphasis than men do on partners' SES in such relationships. Consequently, men's SES and their willingness and ability to invest affection and resources in relationships may often outweigh the effects of their physical attractiveness in women's actual selection of partners. These results and the literature reviewed are more consistent with parental investment theory than with the view that these sex differences are solely the result of differential access to resources and differential socialization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allgeier E., and Fogel, A. (1978). Coital position and sex roles.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 46: 588–589.
Bell, A. P., and Weinberg, M. S. (1978).Homosexualities, Simon and Schuster, New York.
Berscheid, E., and Walster, E. (1974). Physical attractiveness. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Academic Press, New York, pp. 157–215.
Blake, J. (1979). Is zero preferred? American attitudes toward childlessness in the 1970s.J. Marr. Fam. 41: 245–257.
Blake, J. (1982). Demographic revolution and family evolution. In Berman, P., and Ramey, E. (eds.),Women: A Developmental Perspective (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, NIH Publication No. 822298), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Blumstein, P., and Schwartz, P. (1983).American Couples Morrow, New York.
Buss, D. M. (1985). Human mate selection.Am. Sci. 73: 47–51.
Buss, D. M. (1987). Sex differences in human mate selection criteria: An evolutionary perspective. In Crawford, C., Smith, M., and Krebs, D. (eds.),Sociobiology and Psychology Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Buss, D. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54: 616–628.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures.Behav. Brain Sci. 12: 1–49.
Buss, D. M., and Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50: 559–570.
Carroll, J. C., Volk, K. D., and Hyde, J. S. (1985). Differences in motives for engaging in sexual intercourse.Arch. Sex. Behav. 14: 131–143.
Cunningham M. R. (1986). Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50: 925–935.
Daly, M., and Wilson, M. (1983).Sex Evolution, and Behavior Duxbury Press, North Scituate, MA.
Davis, K. (1985). The meaning and significance of marriage in contemporary society. In Davis, K. (ed.),Contemporary Marriage Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
Dion, K. (1981). Physical attractiveness, sex roles, and heterosexual attraction. In Cook, M. (ed.),The Bases of Human Sexual Attraction Academic Press, New York.
Edwards, J. N., and Booth, A. (1976). Sexual behavior in and out of marriage.J. Marr. Fam. 38: 73–81.
Goldman, N., Westoff, C., and Hammerslough, C. (1984). Demography of the marriage market in the United States.Population Index 50: 5–25.
Hatfield, E., and Sprecher, S. (1986).Mirror, Mirror State University of New York Press, Albany.
Hill, C. T., Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. A. (1979). Breakups before marriage: The end of 103 affairs. In Levinger, G., and Moles, O. C. (eds.),Divorce and Separation Basic Books, New York.
Hite, S. (1976).The Hite Report: A Nationwide Study of Female Sexuality Macmillan, New York.
Holmes, S., and Hatch, C. (1938). Personal appearance as related to scholastic records and marriage selection in college women.Hum. Biol. 40: 63–76.
Houston, L. N. (1981). Romanticism and eroticism among black and white college students.Adolescence 16: 263–269.
Hudson, J., and Henze, L. (1969). Campus values in mate selection: A replication.J. Marr. Fam. 31: 772–775.
Huston, T., and Levinger, G. (1979). Interpersonal attraction and relationships.Ann. Rev. Psychol. 29: 115–156.
Kanin, E. J., Davidson, D. R., and Scheck, S. R. (1970). A research note on male-female differentials in the experience of heterosexual love.J. Sex. Res. 6: 64–72.
Keith, P. M. and Schafer, R. B. (1980). Role strain and depression in two-job families.Fam. Rel. 29: 483–488.
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., and Martin, C. E. (1948).Sexual Behavior in the Human Male W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., and Gebhard, P. H. (1953).Sexual Behavior in the Human Female W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.
Kirk, R. E. (1982).Experimental Design, 2nd ed. Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA.
LaPlante, M. N., McCormick, N., and Brannigan, G. B. (1980). Living the sexual script.J. Sex Res. 16: 338–355.
Levi-Strauss, C. (1969).The Elementary Structures of Kinship Beacon Press, Boston.
Liebetrau, A. M. (1983).Measures of Association Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Mathes, E., Brennan, S., Haugen, P., and Rice, H. (1985). Rating of physical attractiveness as a function of age.J. Soc. Psychol. 125: 157–168.
Mazur, A. (1986). U.S. trends in feminine beauty and over-adaptation.J. Sex. Res. 22: 281–303.
McCormick, N. (1979). Come-ons and put-offs: Unmarried students' strategies for having and avoiding sexual intercourse.Psychol. Women Quart. 4: 194–211.
Murstein, B. I., and Christy, P. (1976). Physical attractiveness and marriage adjustment in middleaged couples.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 34: 537–542.
Naficy, A. (1981). Mate selection: the relative contributions of age, physical attractiveness, and income to desirability as romantic and marriage partners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, MI.
Roche, J. P. (1986). Premarital sex: attitudes and behavior by dating stage.Adolescence 21: 107–121.
Scanzoni, J. (1978).Sex Roles, Women's Work, and Marital Conflict Heath, Lexington, MA.
Schoof-Tams, K., Schlaegel, J., and Malczak, L. (1976). Differentiation of sexual morality between 11 and 16 years.Arch. Sex. Behav. 5: 353–370.
Singer, B. (1985a). A comparison of evolutionary and environmental theories of erotic responses, Part I.J. Sex Res. 21: 229–257.
Singer, B. (1985b). A comparison of evolutionary and environmental theories of erotic response, Part II.J. Sex Res. 21: 345–374.
Spanier, G. B. (1976). Formal and informal sex education as determinants of premarital sexual behavior.Arch. Sex. Behav. 5: 39–67.
Symons, D. (1979).Evolution of Human Sexuality Oxford University Press, New York.
Symons, D. (1985). Darwinism and contemporary marriage. In Davis. K. (ed.),Contemporary Marriage Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
Symons, D. (1987). The evolutionary approach: Can Darwin's view of life shed light on human sexuality? In Geer, J., and O'Donohue, W. (eds.),Approaches and Paradigms of Human Sexuality Plenum Press, New York.
Symons, D., and Ellis, B. (1989). Human male-female differences in sexual desire. In Rasa, A., Vogel, C., and Voland, E. (eds.),Sociology of Sexual and Reproductive Strategies Chapman and Hall, London.
Townsend, J. M. (1987). Sex differences in sexuality among medical students: Effects of increasing socioeconomic status.Arch. Sex. Behav. 16: 427–446.
Townsend, J. M. (1989). Mate-selection criteria: A pilot study.Ethol. Sociobiol. 10: 241–253.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (ed.),Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971 Aldine, Chicago.
Udry, J. R. (1977). The importance of being beautiful.Am. J. Sociol. 83: 154–160.
Udry, J. R. (1981). Marital alternatives and marital disruption.J. Marr. Fam. 43: 889–897.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1982).Occupations and Income (Series P-20, No. 380), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Van den Berghe, P., and Barash, D. (1977). Inclusive fitness and human family structure.Am. Anthropol. 79: 809–823.
Webster, M., and Driskell, J. (1983). Beauty as status.Am. J. Sociol. 89: 140–165.
Wilson, G. D. (1981). Cross-generational stability of gender differences in sexuality.Pers. Indiv. Diff. 2: 254–262.
Wilson, G. D. (1987). Male-female differences in sexual activity, enjoyment, and fantasies.Pers. Indiv.Diff. 8: 125–135.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Townsend, J.M., Levy, G.D. Effects of potential partners' physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection. Arch Sex Behav 19, 149–164 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542229
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542229