Cross-gender identity in transvestites and male transsexuals
A self-theory of transvestism and secondary transsexuality in which gender identity is a major self subsystem has been advanced in previous research. Within this framework transsexuals and transvestites were compared on a number of developmental characteristics. While early-onset transsexuals (n =103) were dominantly female, both late-onset transsexuals (n =52) and transvestites (n =36) showed much more feminine behavior than expected. This was interpreted as a sign that they were already developing a feminine gender identity in their early years. Implications for this theory were discussed: (i) The assumption of two gender identity subsystems (a masculine and a feminine) in any human being, which can have any relative strength; (ii) the incorporation of the concept of expression of an identity subsystem, which can be unconditional or conditional (i.e., expression of aspects of the self only if certain conditions are fulfilled) and which has the function of self-seeking. Two continua are proposed. One ranges from a strong feminine gender identity subsystem that is unconditionally expressed to weak unexpressed femininity. The second ranges from a strong and unconditionally expressed masculinity to a weak masculinity. Male-to-female transsexuals (and “normal” females) are characterized by a strong unconditionally expressed feminine gender identity in combination with a weak unexpressed masculinity. Transvestism is a position in between in which both masculinity and femininity are conditionally expressed.
Key wordstranssexualism transvestism gender identity self-theory
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Benjamin, H. (1966).The Transsexual Phenomenon Julian Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Doctor, R. F. (1988).Transvestites and Transsexuals: Towards a Theory of Cross-Gender Behavior Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Dolan, J. (1987). Transsexualism: Syndrome or symptom.Can. J. Psychiat. 32: 666–673.Google Scholar
- Hilgard, E. R. (1977).Divided Consciousness Multiple Controls in Human Thoughts and Action Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
- Hoytink, T. A. E., Doorn, C. D., and Verschoor, A. M. (1991).Gender Identity Development in Homosexual and Heterosexual Male Transsexuals Internal publication, Free University, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- James, W. (1950).Principles of Psychology Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Langevin, R. (1985). The meanings of cross-dressing. In Steiner, B. W. (ed.),Gender Dysphoria: Development, Research, Management Plenum Press, New York, pp. 207–225.Google Scholar
- Money, J. (1974). Two names, two wardrobes, two personalities.J. Homosex. 1: 65–70.Google Scholar
- Money, J., and Ambinder, R. (1978). Two years, real-life diagnostic test: Rehabilitation versus cure. In Brady, J. P., and Brodie, H. K. M. (eds.),Controversy in Psychiatry W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp. 833–845.Google Scholar
- Money, J., and Ehrhardt, A. A. (1972).Man and Woman, Boy and Girl Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
- Prince, V. (1976).Understanding Cross-Dressing Chevalier Publications, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
- Stoller, R. J. (1968).Sex and Gender Science House, New York.Google Scholar