Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 185–201 | Cite as

Cross-gender identity in transvestites and male transsexuals

  • C. D. Doorn
  • J. Poortinga
  • A. M. Verschoor
Article

Abstract

A self-theory of transvestism and secondary transsexuality in which gender identity is a major self subsystem has been advanced in previous research. Within this framework transsexuals and transvestites were compared on a number of developmental characteristics. While early-onset transsexuals (n =103) were dominantly female, both late-onset transsexuals (n =52) and transvestites (n =36) showed much more feminine behavior than expected. This was interpreted as a sign that they were already developing a feminine gender identity in their early years. Implications for this theory were discussed: (i) The assumption of two gender identity subsystems (a masculine and a feminine) in any human being, which can have any relative strength; (ii) the incorporation of the concept of expression of an identity subsystem, which can be unconditional or conditional (i.e., expression of aspects of the self only if certain conditions are fulfilled) and which has the function of self-seeking. Two continua are proposed. One ranges from a strong feminine gender identity subsystem that is unconditionally expressed to weak unexpressed femininity. The second ranges from a strong and unconditionally expressed masculinity to a weak masculinity. Male-to-female transsexuals (and “normal” females) are characterized by a strong unconditionally expressed feminine gender identity in combination with a weak unexpressed masculinity. Transvestism is a position in between in which both masculinity and femininity are conditionally expressed.

Key words

transsexualism transvestism gender identity self-theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benjamin, H. (1966).The Transsexual Phenomenon Julian Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Blanchard, R., Clemmensen, L. H., and Steiner, B. W. (1987). Heterosexual and homosexual gender dysphoria.Arch. Sex. Behav. 16: 139–152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Buhrich, N., and McConaghy, N. (1977). The clinical syndromes of femmiphilic transvestism.Arch. Sex. Behav. 6: 397–412.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Doctor, R. F. (1988).Transvestites and Transsexuals: Towards a Theory of Cross-Gender Behavior Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Dolan, J. (1987). Transsexualism: Syndrome or symptom.Can. J. Psychiat. 32: 666–673.Google Scholar
  6. Epstein, S. (1973). The self-concept revisited: Or a theory of a theory.Am. Psychol. 28: 404–416.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hilgard, E. R. (1977).Divided Consciousness Multiple Controls in Human Thoughts and Action Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Hoytink, T. A. E., Doorn, C. D., and Verschoor, A. M. (1991).Gender Identity Development in Homosexual and Heterosexual Male Transsexuals Internal publication, Free University, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  9. James, W. (1950).Principles of Psychology Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  10. Johnson, S. L, and Hunt, D. D. (1990). The relationship of male transsexual typology to psychological adjustment.Arch. Sex. Behav. 19: 349–360.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Langevin, R. (1985). The meanings of cross-dressing. In Steiner, B. W. (ed.),Gender Dysphoria: Development, Research, Management Plenum Press, New York, pp. 207–225.Google Scholar
  12. Levine, S. B., and Lothstein, L. (1981). Transsexualism or the gender dysphoria syndromes.J. Sex Marital Ther. 7: 85–113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lothstein, L. M. (1979). The aging gender dysphoria (transsexual) patient.Arch. Sex. Behav. 8: 431–443.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Meyer, J. K. (1974). Clinical variants among applicants for sex reassignment.Arch. Sex. Behav. 3: 527–558.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Money, J. (1974). Two names, two wardrobes, two personalities.J. Homosex. 1: 65–70.Google Scholar
  16. Money, J., and Ambinder, R. (1978). Two years, real-life diagnostic test: Rehabilitation versus cure. In Brady, J. P., and Brodie, H. K. M. (eds.),Controversy in Psychiatry W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp. 833–845.Google Scholar
  17. Money, J., and Ehrhardt, A. A. (1972).Man and Woman, Boy and Girl Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  18. Person, E., and Ovesey, L. (1974a). The transsexual syndrome in males: I Primary transsexualism.Am. J. Psychother. 28: 4–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Person, E., and Ovesey, L. (1974b). The transsexual syndrome in males: II Secondary transsexualism.Am. J. Psychother. 28: 174–193.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Person, E., and Ovesey, L. (1976). Transvestism: A disorder of the sense of self.Int. J. Psychoanal. Psychother. 5: 219–235.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Prince, V. (1976).Understanding Cross-Dressing Chevalier Publications, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  22. Roback, H. B., Schartz Felleman, E., and Abramowitz, S. I. (1984). The midlife male sex-change applicant: A multiclinic survey.Arch. Sex. Behav. 13: 141–153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Stoller, R. J. (1968).Sex and Gender Science House, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Verschoor, A. M., and Poortinga, J. (1988). Psychosocial differences between Dutch male and female transsexuals.Arch Sex. Behav. 17: 173–178.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. D. Doorn
    • 1
  • J. Poortinga
    • 1
  • A. M. Verschoor
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Clinical PsychologyFree UniversityAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations