Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 103–124

Cultural factors affecting urban Mexican male homosexual behavior

  • Joseph M. Carrier
Article

Abstract

Some aspects of the mestizoized urban culture in Mexico are linked to male homosexuality in support of the theory that cultural factors play an important role in the kind of life styles and sex practices of males involved in homosexual behavior. The following factors are considered relevant: the sharp dichotomization of gender roles, dual categorization of females as good or bad, separate social networks maintained by males before and after marriage, proportion of unmarried males, and distribution of income. One result of the sharp dichotomization of male and female gender roles is the widely held belief that effeminate males generally prefer to play the female role rather than the male. Effeminacy and homosexuality are also linked by the belief that as a result of this role preference effeminate males are sexually interested only in masculine males with whom they play the passive sex role. The participation of masculine males in homosexual encounters is related in part to a relatively high level of sexual awareness in combination with the lack of stigmatization of the insertor sex role and in part to the restraints placed on alternative sexual outlets by available income and/or marital status. Males involved in homosexual behavior in Mexico operate in a sociocultural environment which gives rise to expectations that they should play either the insertee or insertor sex role but not both and that they should obtain ultimate sexual satisfaction with anal intercourse rather than fellatio. In spite of cultural imperatives, however, individual preferences stemming from other variables such as personality needs, sexual gratification, desires of wanted partners, and amount of involvement may override the imperatives with resulting variations in sexual behavior patterns.

Key words

homosexuality cross-cultural Mexican effeminate masculinity heterosexuality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carrier, J. (1971). Participants in urban Mexican male homosexual encounters.Arch. Sex. Behav. 1(4): 279–291.Google Scholar
  2. Carrier, J. (1972). Urban Mexican male homosexual encounters: An analysis of participants and coping strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
  3. Fourth State of the Nation Report (1974).Separata: Mexican Newsletter No. 21, September 1, 1974, p. 5.Google Scholar
  4. Green, R. (1968). Childhood cross-gender identification.J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 147: 500–509.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Green, R. (1974).Sexual Identity Conflict in Children and Adults Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Hooker, E. (1961). The homosexual community. In Gagnon, J. H., and Simon, W. (eds.),Sexual Deviance Harper and Row, New York, p. 169.Google Scholar
  7. Hooker, E. (1965). An empirical study of some relations between sexual patterns and gender identity in male homosexuals. In Money, J. (ed.),Sex Research: New Developments Holt, New York, pp. 24–25.Google Scholar
  8. Ingham, J. (1968). Culture and personality in a Mexican village. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  9. Kinzer, N. (1973). Priests, machos and babies: Or, Latin American women and the Manichaean heresy.J. Marriage Family 35: 300–311.Google Scholar
  10. Leyva, J. (1970). El problema habitacional. InEl Perfil de Mexico en 1980, Vol. 2, Siglo XXI Editores, S. A., Mexico, D.F.Google Scholar
  11. McGinn, N. (1966). Marriage and family in middle-class Mexico.J. Marriage Family 28: 305–313.Google Scholar
  12. Mexican Census (1970).IX Censo General de Poblacion: 1970 Direccion General de Estadistica, Mexico, D.F.Google Scholar
  13. Peñalosa, F. (1968). Mexican family roles.J. Marriage Family 30: 680–689.Google Scholar
  14. Paz, O. (1950).The Labyrinth of Solitude: Life and Thought in Mexico Grove Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Roebuck, J., and McNamara, P. (1973). Ficheras and free-lancers: prostitution in a Mexican border city.Arch. Sex. Behav. 2(3): 231–244.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ross, S. (1966).Is The Mexican Revolution Dead? Knopf, New York, p. 386.Google Scholar
  17. Taylor, C. (1974). Preliminary report on homosexual subculture in Mexico. Presented to American Anthropological Association Symposium on Homosexuality in Crosscultural Perspective, Mexico City, November 23, 1974, mimeographed.Google Scholar
  18. Velázquez, M. (1967).Spanish and English Dictionary Follett, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Wauchope, R. (1969).Handbook of Middle American Indians: Ethnology, Parts 1 and 2, University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph M. Carrier
    • 1
  1. 1.UCLA School of MedicineGender Identity Research GroupLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Pacific PalisadesUSA

Personalised recommendations