Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 489–502 | Cite as

Heterosexual and homosexual coercion, sexual orientation and sexual roles in medical students

  • Nathaniel McConaghy
  • Ruth Zamir
Article

Abstract

Rape has been conceptualized on a dimension of normal male behavior. The Koss and Oros (1982) study used a questionnaire that allowed men to respond only as sexual aggressors of women, and women only as victims of men. Medical students' responses to a modified questionnaire, in which both sexes reported being aggressors and/or victims, revealed that relatively comparable proportions of men and women were victims of coercive experiences: 35% of women and 30% of men experiencing constant physical attempts to have sexual activity. Forms of coercion not involving threat or use of force were more common, more exclusively heterosexual, and carried out by more equivalent percentages of men and women. 15% of women and 12% of men felt initially coerced into sexual activity but then enjoyed it. Threat or use of force to attempt to or to obtain intercourse were employed by 4% of men and 2% of women and experienced by 5% of both sexes. Half the male victims and female aggressors and a quarter of the male aggressors and female victims who reported such coercion stated it was homosexual. The ratio of homosexual/heterosexual feelings reported by male, but not female, students correlated with the degree of the homosexual coercion they both carried out and experienced. The degree of sexual coercion carried out by men and women correlated with their masculine sex role scores, suggesting, if the dimensional concept of rape is valid, that rape is on a continuum with masculine rather than male behaviors.

Key words

heterosexual coercion homosexual coercion male coercion female coercion sexual roles 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1993).DSM-IV Draft Criteria, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 42: 155–162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkowitz, A. (1992). College men as perpetrators of acquaintance rape and sexual assault: A review of recent research.J. Am. College Health 40: 175–181.Google Scholar
  4. Brooks-Gunn, J., and Furstenberg, F. F. (1989). Adolescent sexual behavior.Am. Psychol. 44: 249–257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Christopher, F. S. (1988). An initial investigation into a continuum of premarital sexual pressure.J. Sex Res. 25: 255–266.Google Scholar
  6. Duncan, D. F. (1990). Prevalence of sexual assault victimization among heterosexual and gay/lesbian university students.Psychol. Rep. 66: 65–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gavey, N. (1991). Sexual victimization prevalence among New Zealand university students.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 59: 464–466.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Groth, A. N., and Burgess, A. W. (1980). Male rape: Offenders and victims.Am. J. Psychiat. 137: 806–810.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Herman, J. L. (1990). Sex offenders A feminist perspective. In Marshall, W. L., Laws, D. R., and Barbaree, H. E. (eds.),Handbook of Sexual Assault, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 177–193.Google Scholar
  10. Kaufman, A., DiVasto, P., Jackson, R., Voorhees, D., and Christy, J. (1980). Male rape victims: Noninstitutionalized assault.Am. J. Psychiat. 137: 221–223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Koss, M. P., and Gidycz, C. A. (1985). Sexual experiences survey reliability and validity.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 53: 422–423.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Koss, M. P., and Oros, C. J. (1982). Sexual experiences survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 50: 455–457.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. McConaghy, N. (1988). Sex-linked behaviors questionnaire. In Davis, C. M., Yarber, W. L., and Davis, S. L. (eds.),Sexuality-Related Measures: A Compendium, Graphic Publishing, Lake Mills, IA, pp. 171–176.Google Scholar
  14. McConaghy, N. (1993).Sexual Behavior: Problems and Management. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. McConaghy, N., Zamir, R., and Manicavasagar, V. (1993). Non-sexist sexual experiences survey and scale of attraction to sexual aggression.Aust. N.Z.J. Psychiat. 27: 686–693.Google Scholar
  16. Muehlenhard, C. L., and Cook, S. W. (1988). Men's self-reports of unwanted sexual activity.J. Sex. Res. 24: 58–72.Google Scholar
  17. Muehlenhard, C. L., and Hollabaugh, L. C. (1988). Do women sometimes say no when they mean yes? The prevalence and correlates of women's token resistance to sex.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54: 872–879.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Muehlenhard, C. L., and Linton, M. A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors.J. Counsel. Psychol. 34: 186–196.Google Scholar
  19. Sorenson, S. B., Stein, J. A., Siegel, J. M., Golding, J. M., and Burnam, M. A. (1987). The prevalence of adult sexual assault.Am. J. Epidemiol. 126: 1154–1164.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Struckman-Johnson, C. (1988). Forced sex on dates: It happens to men, too.J. Sex Res. 24: 234–241.Google Scholar
  21. Struckman-Johnson, C., and Struckman-Johnson, D. (1994). Men pressured and forced into sexual experience.Arch. Sex. Behav. 23: 93–114.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nathaniel McConaghy
    • 1
  • Ruth Zamir
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryPrince of Wales HospitalHigh St. RandwickAustralia

Personalised recommendations